Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Nexus (Professional wrestling): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 28: Line 28:
*'''Keep''' They are the most talked about stable in the entire WWE right now. infact perhaps of all Pro Wrestling.--[[User:Dr. Pizza|Dr. Pizza]] ([[User talk:Dr. Pizza|talk]]) 06:43, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' They are the most talked about stable in the entire WWE right now. infact perhaps of all Pro Wrestling.--[[User:Dr. Pizza|Dr. Pizza]] ([[User talk:Dr. Pizza|talk]]) 06:43, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' Clearly a long term storyline already making headlines. They were involved in the main event at a pay per view and Barrett as it's leader does have a title match coming (unless he doesn't sort out his visa issues which I doubt). [[User:Podgy Stuffn|Podgy Stuffn]] ([[User talk:Podgy Stuffn|talk]]) 08:53, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' Clearly a long term storyline already making headlines. They were involved in the main event at a pay per view and Barrett as it's leader does have a title match coming (unless he doesn't sort out his visa issues which I doubt). [[User:Podgy Stuffn|Podgy Stuffn]] ([[User talk:Podgy Stuffn|talk]]) 08:53, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' They're not notable yet. [[The Main Event Mafia]] was given the same consideration during it's first few additions. It's too soon for this article. <b><font color=#000080 face=times new roman>[[User:Donmega60645|Don]]</FONT></font></sup></font><FONT COLOR=#0000CD FACE=VERDANA ><sup>[[User_Talk:Donmega60645|<b>MEGĂ</b>]]</sup></font>|<font face=verdana size=1><b>[[Special:Contributions/Donmega60645|60645]]</font></b> 12:36, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:36, 2 July 2010

The Nexus (Professional wrestling)

The Nexus (Professional wrestling) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It has barely been a month since the formation, and I feel that maybe in a couple more months notability could be established. It's also mostly a cut and paste from a section of the WWE NXT article.   Θakster   21:10, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly. If the reports are true and Wade Barrett is currently deported in real life due to visa issues, that could make some significant effect to the storyline before it's barely started. And speaking as a fan of this storyline, I still believe an article is not needed. The history simply consists of: beat people up, demand contracts, beat more people up, get contracts, beat even more people up. That could be summed up in a couple of sentences (and it already is through WWE NXT#Season 1). --  Θakster   07:26, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
With that comment, you just proved it should be deleted because you stated its not famous yet. Future notability is the same as no notability!. You can't speculate that notability will be achieved, you have to wait for it, and when its achieved, an article can be made. Feedback 19:51, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This also violates WP:CRYSTALBALL to.--Curtis23's Usalions 22:00, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Opinion.--Curtis23's Usalions 22:00, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment This AFD is filled with stuff like "They will be very famous next month"-If they are they will get a page next month and this violates WP:CRYSTALBALL. "Arguably the #1 storyline right now" This violates WP:NPOV. "The Nexus faction has been incorporated into the main event storyline of the WWE Raw brand for the last month and shows no signs of being moved off of it."-WP:CRYSTALBALL We don't know if they'll end next week."The Nexus are here to stay, I believe, so might as well set up the page now than to delete it and make a new one when they eventually start fighting people on RAW."-WP:CRYSTALBALL."You are just going to have to read it later anyway"-WP:CRYSTALBALL. All 5 keep comments have a violation: 4 WP:CRYSTALBALL violations and 1 WP:NPOV violation. Can't you people who vote keep see that.--Curtis23's Usalions 22:00, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]