User talk:RichardWeiss/new archve: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 14:17, 2 July 2010

This user is not an administrator on the English Wikipedia. (verify)

File:Boxito.jpg

Box

File:Esqueak.jpg

Squeak

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 17:56, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fox NewsI came here to tell you about the article. I cannot think it is about you, given your long-term sterling record of hostility to such stuff. Maybe a b-chat user has joined b-chat using your moniker. Don't waste your money suing them. Best wishes and good luck. Kittybrewster ☎ 16:36, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]I saw your page pop up on my watch list. I thought claim about you in the FoxNews article sounded odd. I'm glad to hear it is not true. Best wishes. --B (talk) 22:18, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]"I will be suing Fox News for damage to my reputation and character." I recommend that you spend most of your time talking to the press and/or promoting a defence fund of some sort; with the idea that since it will be difficult to prove damages based on a nick-name, probably fighting fire with fire is your best bet. Good luck. All that know you find the accusation to be mindless (which again highlights the difficulty of establishing damages. Sue for one dollar??) --- WAS 4.250 (talk) 04:26, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]Hi SqueakBox, the "Signpost" is covering the Fox article in the "In the news" section of this week's issue. Among documenting other issues with the article, Forty two (who has been writing the story) thought about mentioning your reaction too. Would you be comfortable with being cited by (user)name there? We are going to publish this issue soon, probably in just a few hours; if we don't hear back from you before that, your name won't be mentioned. Regards, HaeB (talk) 22:40, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]Looks too late, I imagine, only just opened wikipedia. Thanks, ♫ SqueakBox talk contribs 12:42, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply] Actually not, the issue didn't get published yesterday, and we are still working on finishing that story, so you can still speak your mind. The mention would essentially consist of quoting one or two sentences from your user page. Regards, HaeB (talk) 12:58, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply] Fine by me. Thanks, ♫ SqueakBox talk contribs 22:19, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]Lord Chaitanya knows everything that happens in all three phases (past, present, and future, of time. He knows that in the future some demoni people will serve Lord Advaita.Text 123They will refer to Lord Advaita by the name "Shri Krishna". In this way they will reject the words of the true Vaishnavas.Text 124These sinners will thus disobey the devotees who affirm that Advaita is "the greatest Vaishnava".Text 125Many persons will consider themselves the followers of Lord Advaita, but they will not have the power to see how in the future they will be punished.Text 126Lord Chaitanya, the crest jewel of they who know everything, knew all this. Therefore He did something to try to stop this from happening.Text 127By punishing His mother, Lord Chaitanya showed the result that comes from offending Lord Advaita or any other Vaishnava.Text 128No one can protect a person who has offended a Vaishnava.Text 129Therefore one should avoid persons who offend Vaishnava.Text 130One should avoid an offender, even if the offender is otherwise very qualified. A little association with an offender will make one fall down.Text 131Who has the power to understand why the Lord gives punishment? By punishing His mother, He taught everyone.Text 132Anyone who blasphemes they who use the word `Vaishnava" to address Lord Advaita will be punished. He will perish.Text 133Lord Chaitanya is theSupreme Personality of Godhead, the master of all. To be called His follower is very great praise.Text 134Without any intention to deceive, Lord Chaitanya openly said that Lord Nityananda is the Supreme Personality of Godhead Himself.Text 135By Lord Nityananda's mercy I know Lord Chaitanya. By Lord Nityananda's mercy I know the Vaishnavas.Text 136By Lord Nityananda's mercy offenses are destroyed. By Lord Nityananda's mercy one attains devotion to Lord Vishnu.Text 137Blasphemy directed to Lord Nityananda's servants never enters my mouth. Day and night I happily sing Lord Chaitanya's gloriesText 138I carefully serve Lord Nityananda's devotees. Lord Chaitanya is the life and wealth of Lord Nityananda's servants.Text 139A person who has only a little good fortune will not become Lord Nityananda's servant, for Lord Nityananda's servant is able to see Lord Chaitanya.Text 140Anyone who hears this story of Lord Visvarupa becomes a servant of the limitless Supreme Personality of Godhead. He feels that Lord Nityananda is his very life.Text 141Lord Nityananda and Lord Visvarupa do not have different bodies. This Mother Saci knew. Some other great souls also knew.Text 142Glory to Lord Nityananda, who takes shelter of Lord Chaitanya! Glory, glory to Lord Nityananda, who is thousand-faced Ananta Sesha!Text 143O Lord Nityananda, O king of Gauda-desa, glory to You! Who can attain Lord Chaitanya without first attaining Your mercy?Text 144Anyone who loses Lord Nityananda will not be happy in this life.Text 145Will I some day see Lord Chaitanya, Lord Nityananda, and their associates all thogether in one place?Text 146Lord Chaitanya is my master. With great faith and hope I meditate on Him within my heart.Text 147I bow down before Lord Advaita's feet. I pray that he will always be dear to me and that He will always stay in my thoughts.Text 148The two moons Shri Krishna Chaitanya and Shri Nityananda are my life and soul. I, Vrindavana dasa, sing the glories of Their feet.