Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danger Angel: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 22:00, 7 August 2010

Danger Angel

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Billboard link brings up a whole lot of "not available" nothing. Nothing else I can find that indications notability. Shadowjams (talk) 07:37, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also take a look at User:TezCope, the OP account has similar links to the other creations. Shadowjams (talk) 07:38, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot tell why Billboard has removed the article that was used for the reference in the first place, in any case I will remove it as a reference. However, since this is not the only reference to the article's notability, I can direct you to all the other references that prove notability. You can read the arguments on a previous deletion suggestion that resulted as "non consensus" to see how notability on this article is argumented. If you still need clarification, please follow up. Thanks Alexpts (talk) 12:58, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all the sources are unreliable or primary. And the next person who uses another Wikipedia article as a "reference" will be promptly WP:TROUTed. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 18:00, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:28, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:28, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Previous AFD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danger Angel band closed in April as no consensus. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 21:37, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On TenPoundHammer's comment: I never referenced any wikipedia article on the Danger Angel article. Please specify. Oh I saw it, I am removing it promptly. Did not know this rule. Please, explain why you consider all sources unreliable. All sources are credible, certified media. Please, explain. Alexpts (talk) 11:04, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On Billboard reference issue. Billboard reference is active and valid Alexpts (talk) 11:04, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not notable enough, but the band doesn't pass WP:MUSIC. JJ98 (talk) 14:15, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Meets the following criteria according to WP:MUSIC:

1. Has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent from the musician or ensemble itself and reliable.[note 1] This criterion includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, books, magazine articles, online versions of print media, and television documentaries[note 2] except for the following...

5. Has released two or more albums on a major label or one of the more important indie labels (i.e., an independent label with a history of more than a few years and a roster of performers, many of which are notable).

6. Is an ensemble which contains two or more independently notable musicians, or is a musician who has been a member of two or more independently notable ensembles.

11. Has been placed in rotation nationally by any major radio network.

12. Has been the subject of a half-hour or longer broadcast across a national radio or TV network.

Alexpts (talk) 22:00, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]