Jump to content

Talk:IPod Nano: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Bentoman (talk | contribs)
Line 56: Line 56:
This page needs to be updapted. A new iPod nano came out today. {{unsigned|Price809|21:36, 1 September 2010 (UTC)}}
This page needs to be updapted. A new iPod nano came out today. {{unsigned|Price809|21:36, 1 September 2010 (UTC)}}
:Patience :). -- [[User:Eraserhead1|Eraserhead1]] <[[User_talk:Eraserhead1|talk]]> 21:38, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
:Patience :). -- [[User:Eraserhead1|Eraserhead1]] <[[User_talk:Eraserhead1|talk]]> 21:38, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Also in regards to the image, is the one currently displayed temporary, until the actual device is available to the public to purchase. (then someone needs to buy an iPod nano for photography purpose) [[User:Bentoman|Bentoman]] ([[User talk:Bentoman|talk]]) 00:47, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:47, 2 September 2010


Big Brother:

There is nothing in this article about nano and ipod devices being remotely/wirelessly accessible. Certainly there is a hardware component not yet labeled

Is there any evidence for this? -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 13:16, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Audio output socket

The article does not indicate if the nano has a 2.5mm or 3.5mm stereo jack.

Toby Douglass (talk) 18:53, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Done -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 22:59, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also, this article does not discuss the position of the Audio Jack on the base of the 2G, 4G, and 5G models. At some point between 2G and 5G the Jack moved from rhs to lhs, and this has implications for acessories such as (Sports) Armbands that have a cut-out that must match.

This probably should be discussed. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 22:59, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I agree this should be added. Bought a 5G nano for my aunt for Christmas and it will not fit into her four Apple Universal Docks (kitchen, living room, bedroom, cabin) with the 4G nano insert -- very disappointing! I wish Wikipedia (or Apple) would have warned me about this change!! My Aunt already has a 4G nano, but was having trouble changing playlists since she is in her late 70s and not computer savvy, so I figured I'd buy her a 2nd nano in a different color for storing a different genre of music on it... Kpr00 (talk) 04:30, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You blame Wikipedia for not warning you? Fail. Rehevkor 13:20, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

MP4

Is this a real MPEG-4 Part 14 reader ?

--Mario CUSENZA (talk) 20:01, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:IPod Touch which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 13:15, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Title Capitalisation

Just a thought, but if the Nano is '(trademarked, marketed, and stylized as iPod nano)', why is the 'nano' in the Wikipedia article capitalised? Astonmartini (talk) 06:02, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This has been discussed at length on the iPod Touch talk page a few weeks ago and it isn't going to change I'm afraid. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 19:38, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

New iPod Nano Sept. 2010

This page needs to be updapted. A new iPod nano came out today. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Price809 (talkcontribs) 21:36, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Patience :). -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 21:38, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also in regards to the image, is the one currently displayed temporary, until the actual device is available to the public to purchase. (then someone needs to buy an iPod nano for photography purpose) Bentoman (talk) 00:47, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]