Talk:Ernst Stavro Blofeld

Blofeld primary antagonist of Sean Connery's story arc

If the Sean Connery James Bond is taken as a different person from the other incarnations of Bond within the series, isn't Blofeld just the main antagonist/foil to Sean Connery's Bond? After all, it would be a fitting end for Connery's Bond to get the girl and finally defeat his main enemy in Diamonds. Sean Bond then retires, and Roger Bond takes his place, assuming the "James Bond" false identity. —Preceding unsigned comment added by L'homme du noir (talk • contribs) 02:18, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

TYPE OF CAT

The article on SPECTRE says Blofeld has a white angora cat. This article states it's a persian cat. Does anyone know the definitive answer? --Ledavee 23:09, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

Going by the pictures at Turkish Angora and Persian cat, I'd say it's a silver Persian. 81.76.67.152 (talk) 12:10, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

• A clue that Blofield's last movie YOu Only Live Twice is that his trademark-holding a white cat-is that the cat escapes before Blofield goes down the chimmney! {Kill the villian-but save the pet!}

COUNT OR NOT?

The issue brought up in HMSS, if Blofeld is indeed a Count of Blauchfeld (or whatever name it is), is to my knowledge unanswered. Yes, he did remove his ear lobes, which in it is one of said family's trademark to be born without any, but it seems like there was indeed a real family (inuniverse) and he WAS rather insistent on having the title. Any news either way? ELV

In case you were wondering what his alleged title was, it was Compte (French form of count) de Bleuville in the novel and de Bleuchamp in the movie. Emperor001 02:40, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Bollywood Template

I'm not sure if I got the right person, but were you the person that created the Indian Cinema template and posted on my talk page? Anyway, if it is you, then I do like it :D ImtiazAA 18:39, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

This is the talk page for an article for a fictional character. You're looking for a talk page in the 'user' namespace. Wibbble 22:22, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Succession Boxes

Agree with their removal. The films only make slight claim to a narrative continuum. Barfbagger 19:08, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Dr Evil.jpg

Image:Dr Evil.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:07, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Cat's name

I really would like to know, what the name of his cat is?! Any hints? Grateful thanks... -- Bapho 01:00, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Mr. Bigglesworth. 213.181.226.21 (talk) 21:48, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Dr Evil.jpg

Image:Dr Evil.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 02:22, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

World Domination

"Ernst Stavro Blofeld is a fictional supervillain from the James Bond universe created by Ian Fleming. An evil genius, he is the archenemy of the British Secret Service agent James Bond and head of the global criminal organization SPECTRE with aspirations of world domination. His quest for global supremacy is based around terrorism, revenge and extortion."

From everything I remember in both the Novels and the Movies, Blofeld never aspired for World Domination. His goal was purely money and power, mainly money. Perhaps because he believes that Money rules the world, one could argue in a way that he wants World Domination, but I don't think he is ever stated to actually want that.

• In the movie From Russia With Love, he is simply using the plot to get money from Russia.
• In the movie and Novel Thunderball, he is trying to get money by ransoming the western powers with the two atomic bombs he stole from NATO.
• In the movie You Only Live Twice, he is trying to start a war between the United States and Russia.
• In the novel You Only Live Twice, Blofeld is in hiding while studying death and suicide.
• In the movie and novel On Your Majesty's Secret Service, he is trying to get revenge on England for foiling his plots while also being financed by Russia.
• In the movie Diamonds Are Forever, Blofeld is holding the world ransom.
• Do I even have to mention Never Say Never Again?

So when does he ever aspire for World Domination? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.192.173.146 (talk) 21:13, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Indeed, he doesn't. You Only Live Twice the movie implies heavily that he's being contracted by Red China, who are the ones interested in world domination once East and West have wiped themselves out. Blofeld's just in it for the money.

But it's not solely money, at least not in the books - the book version of YOLT has him leading Japanese youth to suicide not for money or power, just out of a nihilistic impluse that he never really explains. The movies did away with that because it was simpler to just have SPECTRE motivated by cash, as are organized crime groups in real life. 213.181.226.21 (talk) 21:48, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Blofeld's just in it for the money? Yes the main goal of my organisation is to reap as much money as possible. However in doing so it is mine and SPECTRE's goal to dominate the world. Even Dr. No "thought he was Napolean or God". Why do you think I frickin tried to inaugurate a war between Russia and America. Because I wanted just money? Rubbish. The idea was that "once they have anhiliated each other, a new power (SPECTRE) will come to dominate the world". I said this in You Only live Twice. Count Blofeld 22:08, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Sorry Count, but the use of the term "a new power" probably doesn't refer to SPECTRE. The movie made it quite clear that SPECTRE was being contracted by an Asian government that was hostile to both superpowers (ie, Red China). Reasonable to assume that the "new power" in question would be them. Also observe that none of their previous schemes had anything to do with world domination. Their goal in Thunderball was simple extortion; in From Russia With Love, it was also lucrative (stealing the Soviet Lektor and selling it right back to them); in Dr. No, their only target was the U.S. space program, and it's heavily implied that in that one also, they were being contracted by Red China. In On Her Majesty's Secret Service, we have extortion again, as in Diamonds Are Forever (global auction for nuclear supremacy to America, Russia and China).

Always money, money and more money. World domination? Nah, not their style. SPECTRE prefers to remain in the shadows of the great powers and profit off of them. But it's entirely parasitic; they need the superpowers to keep feeding off of, otherwise they'd die out too. 193.253.237.223 (talk) 22:20, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Blofeld's death

So Blofeld dies only in the film "For your eyes only" and not in the novels? --93.149.53.169 (talk) 12:43, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Blofeld dies in You Only Live Twice.--66.245.248.55 (talk) 23:05, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

No I didn't otherwise I wouldn't have appeared in Piz Gloria two years later. Watch the film again I pressed the detonator switch and fled the volcano out of the escape hatch holding my kitty The Bald One ^{White cat} 19:47, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Number 1

It is said plainly in the novel Thunderball that the number system that Spectre uses is not a ranking system, but an identifier. The number rotates on the first of every month, and in Thunderball, Blofeld just happens to be #1 and Largo #2.--66.245.248.55 (talk) 23:09, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

I am always #1 The Bald One ^{White cat} 19:48, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Drevil million dollars.jpg

The image File:Drevil million dollars.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
• That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --07:46, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Telly Savalas as inspiration for Lex Luthor

The article claims (in the "Cultural Impact" section) that Telly Savalas' portrayal of Blofeld was the inspiration for Lex Luthor in the "Superman" animated series. The creators have only stated that the inspiration was Mr. Savalas himself, not any particular role he played. I'm commenting out the claim. If anyone can produce a valid source for the claim, feel free to reinstate it. 98.213.251.93 (talk) 05:04, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

I don't see how this could be. Lex Luthor existed in "Superman" comics in the 1930s, when Telly Savalas was a young kid (and presumably still had hair), and long before Fleming began writing the Bond novels.Maccb (talk) 03:16, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Footnote 1 is deeply unsatisfactory

It starts "it is commonly believed", which is a bit of a red flag in itself, and then proceeds to make several other assertions without providing a shred of supporting evidence for any of them. It is also linked from "According to the novel", even though none of the assertions in the footnote is sourced from the novel. However, because it is a footnote, when reading the text of the article it looks as if the "According to the novel" text has been properly cited, which it has not. Loganberry (Talk) 15:22, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

The footnote also contradicts the later, sourced, assertion that the character was probably names after Tom Blofeld. Cordless Larry (talk) 14:29, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

Blofeld's Neck

Clearly at the end of OHMSS during the luge scene, Blofeld is above Bond, choking him. Suddenly a well placed tree branch catches Blofeld's neck in a fork, breaking it. Bond escapes, again. This is why the Blofeld that dies in Roger Moore's movie is in a wheelchair. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.113.49.126 (talk) 06:55, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Except that the next time we see him in Diamonds Are Forever he appears just fine with no wheelchair or neck brace. KJH17 03:20, 14 January 2010

Well, he took lots of Advil.... yeah, Advil.... 24.202.251.225 (talk) 17:53, 15 September 2010 (UTC)