Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Randall Brown: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m Signing comment by 75.85.117.139 - "→Randall Brown: " |
Trekkiemnstr (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
*'''Delete''' per [[WP:BLP]] and [[WP:ENT]]. He's sure popular with his own sockpuppets though! [[User:Starblind|Andrew Lenahan]] - <b><FONT COLOR="#FF0000">St</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FF5500">ar</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FF8000">bli</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FFC000">nd</FONT></b> 21:29, 17 September 2010 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' per [[WP:BLP]] and [[WP:ENT]]. He's sure popular with his own sockpuppets though! [[User:Starblind|Andrew Lenahan]] - <b><FONT COLOR="#FF0000">St</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FF5500">ar</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FF8000">bli</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FFC000">nd</FONT></b> 21:29, 17 September 2010 (UTC) |
||
*they're not my sock puppets and i'm kind of offended by the accusations. obviously you have all made up your mind about the article. sure, randall is not a mega celebrity, but he's known well enough in certain circles. oh well. i have no choice but to surrender to the elitest wikipedia editors, despite the fact that it seems like 98% of people don't even have wikipedia accounts (obviously that is not a verifiable number, but i only know like one person who has ever edited anything on wikipedia). it just seems strange to have criteria that is so subjective and so easily contested by any individual on the site. certainly, there needs to be some sort of filter so that not every person/place/thing in the universe has its own article, but the idea of a democratic encyclopedia should not be overshadowed by a handful of individuals who feel the need to police the internet. anyway, do what you want... <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/75.85.117.139|75.85.117.139]] ([[User talk:75.85.117.139|talk]]) 22:36, 17 September 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
*they're not my sock puppets and i'm kind of offended by the accusations. obviously you have all made up your mind about the article. sure, randall is not a mega celebrity, but he's known well enough in certain circles. oh well. i have no choice but to surrender to the elitest wikipedia editors, despite the fact that it seems like 98% of people don't even have wikipedia accounts (obviously that is not a verifiable number, but i only know like one person who has ever edited anything on wikipedia). it just seems strange to have criteria that is so subjective and so easily contested by any individual on the site. certainly, there needs to be some sort of filter so that not every person/place/thing in the universe has its own article, but the idea of a democratic encyclopedia should not be overshadowed by a handful of individuals who feel the need to police the internet. anyway, do what you want... <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/75.85.117.139|75.85.117.139]] ([[User talk:75.85.117.139|talk]]) 22:36, 17 September 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
:*sorry. forgot to login. i'm sure that's a common problem.--[[User:Trekkiemnstr|Trekkiemnstr]] ([[User talk:Trekkiemnstr|talk]]) 22:40, 17 September 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 22:40, 17 September 2010
- Randall Brown (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable actor, does not satisfy criteria listed in WP:ENT Catfish Jim and the soapdish (talk) 08:33, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom. Autobiography lacking reliable sources, notability not established. JNW (talk) 10:31, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
- Delete, not notable. Hairhorn (talk) 11:54, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
- Keep, subject has performed in many stage shows, appeared in well known television programs, and portrayed the lead in award winning feature films. in addition, has been in front page ny times articles and been featured in international news segments. --Trekkiemnstr (talk) 16:25, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
- Keep,I have seen him on The Coaching Corner.--Carriestula (talk) 17:22, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
(UTC)
- Keep, I have also seen him on The Coaching Corner. I also followed his references and they all fit true. Acting is his profession, he has credits, I do not understand what makes someone "notable" enough. Keep. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.205.138.95 (talk • contribs) This template must be substituted.
- Delete per WP:BLP and WP:ENT. He's sure popular with his own sockpuppets though! Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 21:29, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
- they're not my sock puppets and i'm kind of offended by the accusations. obviously you have all made up your mind about the article. sure, randall is not a mega celebrity, but he's known well enough in certain circles. oh well. i have no choice but to surrender to the elitest wikipedia editors, despite the fact that it seems like 98% of people don't even have wikipedia accounts (obviously that is not a verifiable number, but i only know like one person who has ever edited anything on wikipedia). it just seems strange to have criteria that is so subjective and so easily contested by any individual on the site. certainly, there needs to be some sort of filter so that not every person/place/thing in the universe has its own article, but the idea of a democratic encyclopedia should not be overshadowed by a handful of individuals who feel the need to police the internet. anyway, do what you want... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.85.117.139 (talk) 22:36, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
- sorry. forgot to login. i'm sure that's a common problem.--Trekkiemnstr (talk) 22:40, 17 September 2010 (UTC)