Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hindu jihad

Hindu jihad

Hindu jihad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

New article with major POV problems. Nothing but a biased rant against Hindus. Topic could be covered in other existing articles such as Terrorism in India etc. Dmol (talk) 07:22, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

• Delete I have launched a jihad on this article. failed to find reliable sources for this article. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 10:19, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Actually, what sources exist (such as Asthana's & Nirmal's Urban Terrorism : Myths And Realities for example) explain that you're mis-using the idea of jihad right here as much as it has been mis-used by others. Try having a Dharmayuddha instead. Uncle G (talk) 12:32, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
• Definitely delete. The very existence of this idea is contested. I failed to find reliable sources to support the definition of this dubious ideology. The term is used and understood by very few people, which means that it is not notable enough. TYelliot (talk) 10:35, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
• Speedy delete: WP:ATTACK, WP:OR, WP:NOTSOAPBOX, WP:NOTNEWS -- BenTels (talk) 11:42, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
• Speedy delete Per WP:NOTNEWS and WP:OR. Also seems to have some major POV issues. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 12:31, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
• Delete as soapboxing. Interestingly, there is a "Hindu Jihad' community hosted by Wikia - and founded today. It was started (and at this moment solely contributed to) by someone using the same username as the creator of this article. There are ghits for the term "Hindu jihad", and there are undoubtedly Hindu extremists, but this article would probably need totally rewriting to remove the inflammatory tone and unreferenced (and possibly suspect) claims in places. Peridon (talk) 12:38, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete giant biased rant about topics already covered well by pages like Saffron terror, Religious violence in India, and Hindu nationalism.Pectore^talk 16:46, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:SOAPBOX Totnesmartin (talk) 18:20, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Article hindu jihad is changed

• Hai i created this article hindu jihad, A word hindu jihad is refer to struggle, striving or dharma(sanskrit). I accept i enter some mismatching data's in topic hindu jihad. Please see the article history, on 4th octobar, i changed total irrelavant matter in this articles.

• What i was enter before that data's are related to "hindu jihad attacks", soon i will create new page for older data's. I giving some answers to users who enter a commons about this article.

• Dmol - he said this topic is covered under terrorism in india and it will hurt hindus. ANS : I accept my mistake dmol, i changed total data's and now it will not hurt hindus.

• Uncle G - he jovially commanded about topic. TYelliot - he said their is no reliable source about data,s. ANS: now i have given all the data's.

• Peridon, Pectore - they suggested topic name should be hindu extremist not hindu jihad, now i changed the data's. sorry to say that, i enter data's of other topic like hindu jihad attacks. Once again i am saying that please see the revised hindu jihad edition. mohasik(talk) 10:16, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
• Comment It's just become am essay. A lot of religions start with 'slay the unbeliever' clauses built in. Some of them grow up out of it. In the others, most of the adherents do, but some become extremists. This is a problem with having 'holy books'. Peridon (talk) 11:15, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:18, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
• Note: The article under discussion here has been flagged for {{rescue}} by the Article Rescue Squadron, with no explanation as to why this article should be rescued and how that could happen (per ARS instructions). SnottyWong ^confer 00:49, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
• Note: This article has been nominated for rescue. 94.58.82.131 (talk) 05:49, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

• REASON FOR RESCUE: ARTICLE IRRELAVANT DATA'S CHANGED ON OCT 04
• keep: its a old concept, this AFD is implied on this article for before OCT 04. After than total irrelavent data'd are removed. now it has relavent sources