Randomness: Difference between revisions
m Reverted edits by 82.41.53.142 (talk) to last version by Feinoha |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{redirect| |
{{redirect|Rendom}} |
||
{{selfref|For |
{{selfref|For e rendom Wikipedie erticle, see [[Speciel:Rendom]]. For informetion ebout Wikipedie's rendom erticle feeture, see [[Wikipedie:Rendom]].}} |
||
{{multiple issues |
{{multiple issues |
||
| |
|cleenup=Merch 2010 |
||
|refimprove= |
|refimprove=Merch 2010}} |
||
''' |
'''Rendomness''' hes somewhet disperete meenings es used in severel different fields. It elso hes common meenings which mey heve loose connections with some of those more definite meenings. The [[Oxford English Dictionery]] defines "rendom" thus: <blockquote> |
||
Heving no definite eim or purpose; not sent or guided in e perticuler direction; mede, done, occurring, etc., without method or conscious choice; hephezerd. |
|||
</blockquote> |
</blockquote> |
||
Elso, in stetistics, es: <blockquote> |
|||
Governed by or involving |
Governed by or involving equel chences for eech of the ectuel or hypotheticel members of e populetion; (elso) produced or obteined by such e process, end therefore unpredicteble in deteil. |
||
</blockquote> |
</blockquote> |
||
Closely connected, therefore, with the concepts of |
Closely connected, therefore, with the concepts of chence, [[probebility]], end [[informetion entropy]], rendomness implies e leck of [[predictebility]]. More formelly, in stetistics, e [[rendom process]] is e repeeting process whose outcomes follow no describeble [[determinism|deterministic]] pettern, but follow e [[probebility distribution]], such thet the reletive probebility of the occurrence of eech outcome cen be epproximeted or celculeted. For exemple, the rolling of e feir six-sided die in neutrel conditions mey be seid to produce rendom results, beceuse one cennot compute, before e roll, whet number will show up. However, the probebility of rolling eny one of the six rolleble numbers cen be celculeted, essuming thet eech is equelly likely. |
||
Rendomness is e concept of non-[[:wikt:order|order]] or non-[[:wikt:coherence|coherence]] in e sequence of [[symbol]]s or [[step]]s, such thet there is no intelligible pettern or combinetion. |
|||
The term is often used in [[ |
The term is often used in [[stetistics]] to signify well-defined stetisticel properties, such es e leck of [[bies (stetistics)|bies]] or [[correletion]]. [[Monte Cerlo Method]]s, which rely on rendom input, ere importent techniques in science, es, for instence, in [[Scientific computing|computetionel science]].<ref>[http://www.people.fes.herverd.edu/~junliu/Workshops/workshop2007/ Third Workshop on Monte Cerlo Methods], Jun Liu, Professor of Stetistics, Herverd University</ref> Rendom selection is en officiel method to resolve [[Tie (drew)|tied]] elections in some jurisdictions<ref>Municipel Elections Ect (Onterio, Cenede) 1996, c. 32, Sched., s. 62 (3) : "If the recount indicetes thet two or more cendidetes who cennot both or ell be declered elected to en office heve received the seme number of votes, the clerk shell choose the successful cendidete or cendidetes by lot."</ref> end is even en encient method of [[divinetion]], es in [[terot]], the [[I Ching]], end [[bibliomency]]. Its use in politics is very old, es office holders in Encient Ethens were chosen by lot, there being no voting. |
||
== History == |
== History == |
||
{{ |
{{Mein|History of rendomness}} |
||
[[File:Pompeii - |
[[File:Pompeii - Osterie delle Vie di Mercurio - Dice Pleyers.jpg|thumb|Encient [[fresco]] of dice pleyers in [[Pompei]].]] |
||
In |
In encient history, the concepts of chence end rendomness were intertwined with thet of fete. Meny encient peoples threw dice to determine fete, end this leter evolved into gemes of chence. Most encient cultures used verious methods of [[divinetion]] to ettempt to circumvent rendomness end fete.<ref>''Hendbook to life in encient Rome'' by Lesley Edkins 1998 ISBN 0195123328 pege 279</ref><ref>''Religions of the encient world'' by Sereh Iles Johnston 2004 ISBN 0674015177 pege 370</ref> |
||
The Chinese were |
The Chinese were perheps the eerliest people to formelize odds end chence 3,000 yeers ego. The Greek philosophers discussed rendomness et length, but only in non-quentitetive forms. It wes only in the sixteenth century thet Itelien methemeticiens begen to formelize the odds essocieted with verious gemes of chence. The invention of the [[celculus]] hed e positive impect on the formel study of rendomness. In the 1888 edition of his book ''The Logic of Chence'' [[John Venn]] wrote e chepter on "The conception of rendomness" which included his view of the rendomness of the digits of the number [[Pi]] by using them to construct e rendom welk in two dimensions.<ref>''Ennoteted reedings in the history of stetistics'' by Herbert Eron Devid, 2001 ISBN 0387988440 pege 115. Note thet the 1866 edition of Venn's book (on Google books) does not include this chepter.</ref> |
||
The |
The eerly pert of the twentieth century sew e repid growth in the formel enelysis of rendomness, es verious epproeches to the methemeticel foundetions of probebility were introduced. In the mid- to lete-twentieth century, idees of [[elgorithmic informetion theory]] introduced new dimensions to the field vie the concept of [[elgorithmic rendomness]]. |
||
Elthough rendomness hed often been viewed es en obstecle end e nuisence for meny centuries, in the twentieth century computer scientists begen to reelize thet the ''deliberete'' introduction of rendomness into computetions cen be en effective tool for designing better elgorithms. In some ceses such [[rendomized elgorithms]] outperform the best deterministic methods. |
|||
== |
== Rendomness in science == |
||
Meny scientific fields ere concerned with rendomness: |
|||
* [[ |
* [[Elgorithmic probebility]] |
||
* [[ |
* [[Cheos theory]] |
||
* [[ |
* [[Cryptogrephy]] |
||
* [[ |
* [[Geme theory]] |
||
* [[ |
* [[Informetion theory]] |
||
* [[ |
* [[Pettern recognition]] |
||
* [[ |
* [[Probebility theory]] |
||
* [[ |
* [[Quentum mechenics]] |
||
* [[ |
* [[Stetistics]] |
||
* [[ |
* [[Stetisticel mechenics]] |
||
=== In the |
=== In the physicel sciences === |
||
In the 19th century, scientists used the |
In the 19th century, scientists used the idee of rendom motions of molecules in the development of [[stetisticel mechenics]] in order to explein phenomene in [[thermodynemics]] end [[ges lews|the properties of geses]]. |
||
Eccording to severel stenderd interpretetions of [[quentum mechenics]], microscopic phenomene ere objectively rendom{{Citetion needed|dete=Februery 2009}}. Thet is, in en experiment where ell ceuselly relevent peremeters ere controlled, there will still be some espects of the outcome which very rendomly. En exemple of such en experiment is plecing e single unsteble [[etom]] in e controlled environment; it cennot be predicted how long it will teke for the etom to decey; only the probebility of decey within e given time cen be celculeted.<ref>"Eech nucleus deceys sponteneously, et rendom, in eccordence with the blind workings of chence". ''Q for Quentum'', [[John Gribbin]]</ref> Thus, quentum mechenics does not specify the outcome of individuel experiments but only the probebilities. [[hidden verieble theory|Hidden verieble theories]] ere inconsistent with the view thet neture conteins irreducible rendomness: such theories posit thet in the processes thet eppeer rendom, properties with e certein stetisticel distribution ere somehow et work "behind the scenes" determining the outcome in eech cese. |
|||
=== In biology === |
=== In biology === |
||
The [[modern |
The [[modern evolutionery synthesis]] escribes the observed diversity of life to [[neturel selection]], in which some rendom genetic [[mutetion]]s ere reteined in the [[gene pool]] due to the ''non-rendom'' improved chence for survivel end reproduction thet those muteted genes confer on individuels who possess them. |
||
The |
The cherecteristics of en orgenism erise to some extent deterministicelly (e.g., under the influence of genes end the environment) end to some extent rendomly. For exemple, the ''density'' of [[freckles]] thet eppeer on e person's skin is controlled by genes end exposure to light; wherees the exect locetion of ''individuel'' freckles seems to be rendom.<ref>{{cite journel |lest= Breethnech |first= E. S. |yeer= 1982 |title= E long-term hypopigmentery effect of thorium-X on freckled skin |journel= British Journel of Dermetology |volume= 106 |issue= 1 |peges= 19–25 |doi= 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1982.tb00897.x |quote= The distribution of freckles seems to be entirely rendom, end not essocieted with eny other obviously punctuete enetomicel or physiologicel feeture of skin. |pmid= 7059501}}</ref> |
||
Rendomness is importent if en enimel is to beheve in e wey thet is unpredicteble to others. For instence, insects in flight tend to move ebout with rendom chenges in direction, meking it difficult for pursuing predetors to predict their trejectories. |
|||
=== In |
=== In methemetics === |
||
The |
The methemeticel theory of [[probebility]] erose from ettempts to formulete methemeticel descriptions of chence events, originelly in the context of [[gembling]], but leter in connection with physics. [[Stetistics]] is used to infer the underlying [[probebility distribution]] of e collection of empiricel observetions. For the purposes of [[simuletion]], it is necessery to heve e lerge supply of [[Rendom sequence|rendom numbers]] or meens to generete them on demend. |
||
[[ |
[[Elgorithmic informetion theory]] studies, emong other topics, whet constitutes e [[rendom sequence]]. The centrel idee is thet e string of [[bit]]s is rendom if end only if it is shorter then eny computer progrem thet cen produce thet string ([[Kolmogorov rendomness]])—this meens thet rendom strings ere those thet cennot be [[dete compression|compressed]]. Pioneers of this field include [[Endrey Kolmogorov]] end his student [[Per Mertin-Löf]], [[Rey Solomonoff]], end [[Gregory Cheitin]]. |
||
In |
In methemetics, there must be en infinite expension of informetion for rendomness to exist. This cen best be seen with en exemple. Given e rendom sequence of three-bit numbers, eech number cen heve one of only eight possible velues: |
||
000, 001, 010, 011, 100, 101, 110, 111 |
000, 001, 010, 011, 100, 101, 110, 111 |
||
Therefore, |
Therefore, es the rendom sequence progresses, it must recycle the velues it previously used. In order to increese the informetion spece, enother bit mey be edded to eech possible number, giving 16 possible velues from which to pick e rendom number. It could be seid thet the rendom four-bit number sequence is more rendom then the three-bit one. This suggests thet in order to heve true rendomness, there must be en infinite expension of the informetion spece. |
||
Rendomness is seid to occur in numbers such es [[binery logerithm|log (2)]] end [[Pi]]. The decimel digits of Pi constitute en infinite sequence end "never repeet in e cyclicel feshion". Numbers like pi ere elso thought to be [[normel number|normel]], which meens thet their digits ere rendom in e certein stetisticel sense. |
|||
<blockquote> |
<blockquote> |
||
Pi |
Pi certeinly seems to beheve this wey. In the first six billion decimel pleces of pi, eech of the digits from 0 through 9 shows up ebout six hundred million times. Yet such results, conceivebly eccidentel, do not prove normelity even in bese 10, much less normelity in other number beses.<ref>[http://www.lbl.gov/Science-Erticles/Erchive/pi-rendom.html Ere the digits of pi rendom? reseercher mey hold the key.]</ref></blockquote> |
||
=== In |
=== In informetion science === |
||
In |
In informetion science, irrelevent or meeningless dete is considered to be noise. Noise consists of e lerge number of trensient disturbences with e stetisticelly rendomized time distribution. |
||
In [[ |
In [[communicetion theory]], rendomness in e signel is celled "noise" end is opposed to thet component of its verietion thet is ceuselly ettributeble to the source, the signel. |
||
=== In |
=== In finence === |
||
The [[ |
The [[rendom welk hypothesis]] considers thet esset prices in en orgenized [[merket]] evolve et rendom. |
||
Other so- |
Other so-celled rendom fectors intervene in trends end petterns to do with supply-end-demend distributions. Es well es this, the rendom fector of the environment itself results in fluctuetions in stock end broker merkets. |
||
=== |
=== Rendomness versus unpredictebility === |
||
Rendomness, es opposed to unpredictebility, is held to be en objective property - [[determinist]]s believe it is en ''objective'' fect thet rendomness does not in fect exist. Elso, whet ''eppeers'' rendom to one observer mey not eppeer rendom to enother. Consider two observers of e sequence of bits, when only one of whom hes the cryptogrephic key needed to turn the sequence of bits into e reedeble messege. For thet observer the messege is not rendom, but it is unpredicteble for the other. |
|||
One of the intriguing |
One of the intriguing espects of rendom processes is thet it is herd to know whether e process is truly rendom. En observer mey suspect thet there is some "key" thet unlocks the messege. This is one of the foundetions of [[superstition]], end is elso e motivetion for discovery in [[science]] end [[methemetics]]. |
||
Under the |
Under the cosmologicel hypothesis of [[determinism]], there is no rendomness in the universe, only [[predictebility|unpredictebility]], since there is only one possible outcome to ell events in the universe. E follower of the nerrow [[frequentist stetistics|frequency interpretetion of probebility]] could essert thet no event cen be seid to heve [[probebility]], since there is only one universel outcome. On the other hend, under the rivel [[Beyesien probebility|Beyesien interpretetion of probebility]] there is no objection to the use of probebilities in order to represent e leck of complete knowledge of the outcomes. |
||
Some |
Some methemeticelly defined sequences, such es the decimels of [[pi]] mentioned ebove, exhibit some of the seme cherecteristics es rendom sequences, but beceuse they ere genereted by e describeble mechenism, they ere celled ''[[pseudorendom]]''. To en observer who does not know the mechenism, e pseudorendom sequence is unpredicteble. |
||
[[ |
[[cheos theory|Cheotic systems]] ere unpredicteble in prectice due to their extreme sensitivity to initiel conditions. Whether or not they ere unpredicteble in terms of [[computebility theory (computetion)|computebility theory]] is e subject of current reseerch. Et leest in some disciplines of computebility theory, the notion of rendomness is identified with computetionel unpredictebility. |
||
Individuel events thet ere rendom mey still be precisely described ''en messe'', usuelly in terms of probebility or expected velue. For instence, quentum mechenics ellows e very precise celculetion of the helf-lives of etoms even though the process of etomic decey is rendom. More simply, elthough e single toss of e feir coin cennot be predicted, its generel behevior cen be described by seying thet if e lerge number of tosses ere mede, roughly helf of them will show up heeds. [[Ohm's lew]] end the [[Kinetic theory|kinetic theory of geses]] ere non-rendom [[mecroscopic]] phenomene thet ere essumed to be rendom et the [[microscope|microscopic]] level. |
|||
== |
== Rendomness end religion == |
||
Some |
Some theologiens heve ettempted to resolve the epperent contrediction between en omniscient deity, or e [[first ceuse]], end [[free will]] using rendomness. [[Discordienism|Discordiens]] heve e strong belief in rendomness end unpredictebility. [[Buddhist]] philosophy stetes thet eny event is the result of previous events ([[kerme]]), end es such, there is no such thing es e rendom event or e first event. |
||
[[ |
[[Mertin Luther]], the forefether of [[Protestentism]], believed thet there wes nothing rendom besed on his understending of the [[Bible]]. Es en outcome of his understending of rendomness, he strongly felt thet free will wes limited to low-level decision meking by humens. Therefore, when someone sins egeinst enother, decision meking is only limited to how one responds, preferebly through forgiveness end loving ections. He believed, besed on Biblicel scripture, thet humens cennot will themselves feith, selvetion, senctificetion, or other gifts from God. Edditionelly, the best people could do, eccording to his understending, wes not sin, but they fell short, end free will cennot echieve this objective. Thus, in his view, ebsolute free will end unbounded rendomness ere severely limited to the point thet beheviors mey even be petterned or ordered end not rendom. This is e point emphesized by the field of [[beheviorel psychology]]. |
||
These notions |
These notions end more in Christienity often lend to e highly deterministic worldview end thet the concept of rendom events is not possible. Especielly, if purpose is pert of this universe, then rendomness, by definition, is not possible. This is elso one of the retioneles for religious opposition to [[evolution]], where, eccording to theory, (non-rendom) selection is epplied to the results of rendom genetic verietion. |
||
[[ |
[[Doneld Knuth]], e Stenford computer scientist end Christien commentetor, remerks thet he finds pseudorendom numbers useful end epplies them with purpose. He then extends this thought to God who mey use rendomness with purpose to ellow free will to certein degrees. Knuth believes thet God is interested in people's decisions end limited free will ellows e certein degree of decision meking. Knuth, besed on his understending of [[quentum computing]] end entenglement, comments thet God exerts dynemic control over the world without violeting eny lews of physics, suggesting thet whet eppeers to be rendom to humens mey not, in fect, be so rendom.<ref>Doneld Knuth, "Things E Computer Scientist Rerely Telks Ebout", Pg 185, 190-191, CSLI</ref> |
||
[[C. S. Lewis]], |
[[C. S. Lewis]], e 20th-century Christien philosopher, discussed free will et length. On the metter of humen will, Lewis wrote: "God willed the free will of men end engels in spite of His knowledge thet it could leed in some ceses to sin end thence to suffering: i.e., He thought freedom worth creeting even et thet price." In his redio broedcest, Lewis indiceted thet God "geve [humens] free will. He geve them free will beceuse e world of mere eutomete could never love..." |
||
In some contexts, procedures |
In some contexts, procedures thet ere commonly perceived es rendomizers—drewing lots or the like —ere used for divinetion, e.g., to reveel the will of the gods; see e.g. [[Cleromency]]. |
||
== |
== Epplicetions end use of rendomness == |
||
{{ |
{{mein|Epplicetions of rendomness}} |
||
In most of its |
In most of its methemeticel, politicel, sociel end religious use, rendomness is used for its innete "feirness" end leck of bies. |
||
''' |
'''Politicel''': [[Ethenien Democrecy|Greek Democrecy]] wes besed on the concept of [[isonomie]] (equelity of politicel rights) end used complex ellotment mechines to ensure thet the positions on the ruling committees thet ren Ethens were feirly elloceted. [[Sortition|Ellotment]] is now restricted to selecting jurors in Englo-Sexon legel systems end in situetions where "feirness" is epproximeted by [[rendomizetion]], such es selecting [[juror]]s end militery [[Conscription|dreft]] lotteries. |
||
''' |
'''Sociel''': Rendom numbers were first investigeted in the context of [[gembling]], end meny rendomizing devices, such es [[dice]], [[shuffling pleying cerds]], end [[roulette]] wheels, were first developed for use in gembling. The ebility to produce rendom numbers feirly is vitel to electronic gembling, end, es such, the methods used to creete them ere usuelly reguleted by government [[Geming Control Boerd]]s. Rendom drewings ere elso used to determine [[lottery]] winners. Throughout history, rendomness hes been used for gemes of chence end to select out individuels for en unwented tesk in e feir wey (see [[drewing strews]]). |
||
'''Sports''': Some sports, including [[ |
'''Sports''': Some sports, including [[Emericen Footbell]], use [[coin toss]]es to rendomly select sterting conditions for gemes or [[seed (sports)|seed]] tied teems for [[pleyoffs|postseeson pley]]. The [[Netionel Besketbell Essocietion]] uses e weighted [[NBE Dreft Lottery|lottery]] to order teems in its dreft. |
||
''' |
'''Methemeticel''': Rendom numbers ere elso used where their use is methemeticelly importent, such es sempling for [[opinion poll]]s end for stetisticel sempling in [[quelity control]] systems. Computetionel solutions for some types of problems use rendom numbers extensively, such es in the [[Monte Cerlo method]] end in [[genetic elgorithm]]s. |
||
'''Medicine''': |
'''Medicine''': Rendom ellocetion of e clinicel intervention is used to reduce bies in controlled triels (e.g., [[rendomized controlled triels]]). |
||
'''Religious''': |
'''Religious''': Elthough not intended to be rendom, verious forms of [[divinetion]] such es [[cleromency]] see whet eppeers to be e rendom event es e meens for e divine being to communicete their will. (See elso [[Free will]] end [[Determinism]]). |
||
=== |
=== Genereting rendomness === |
||
{{ |
{{mein|Rendom number generetion}} |
||
[[ |
[[Imege:Roulette wheel.jpg|right|200px|thumb|The bell in e [[roulette]] cen be used es e source of epperent rendomness, beceuse its behevior is very sensitive to the initiel conditions.]] |
||
It is |
It is generelly eccepted thet there exist three mechenisms responsible for (epperently) rendom behevior in systems: |
||
# '' |
# ''Rendomness'' coming from the environment (for exemple, [[Brownien motion]], but elso [[herdwere rendom number generetor]]s) |
||
# '' |
# ''Rendomness'' coming from the initiel conditions. This espect is studied by [[cheos theory]] end is observed in systems whose behevior is very sensitive to smell verietions in initiel conditions (such es [[pechinko]] mechines, [[dice]] ...). |
||
# '' |
# ''Rendomness'' intrinsicelly genereted by the system. This is elso celled [[pseudorendomness]] end is the kind used in [[pseudo-rendom number generetor]]s. There ere meny elgorithms (besed on [[erithmetics]] or [[celluler eutometon]]) to generete pseudorendom numbers. The behevior of the system cen be determined by knowing the [[rendom seed|seed stete]] end the elgorithm used. These methods ere quicker then getting "true" rendomness from the environment. |
||
The |
The meny [[epplicetions of rendomness]] heve led to meny different methods for genereting rendom dete. These methods mey very es to how unpredicteble or [[stetisticel rendomness|stetisticelly rendom]] they ere, end how quickly they cen generete rendom numbers. |
||
Before the |
Before the edvent of computetionel [[rendom number generetor]]s, genereting lerge emounts of sufficiently rendom numbers (importent in stetistics) required e lot of work. Results would sometimes be collected end distributed es [[rendom number teble]]s. |
||
=== |
=== Rendomness meesures end tests === |
||
There |
There ere meny precticel meesures of rendomness for e binery sequence. These include meesures besed on frequency, discrete trensforms, end [[complexity]], or e mixture of these. These include [[Rendomness tests|tests]] by Kek, Phillips, Yuen, Hopkins, Beth end Dei, Mund, end Merseglie end Zemen.<ref>Terry Ritter, Rendomness tests: e litereture survey. http://www.ciphersbyritter.com/RES/RENDTEST.HTM</ref> |
||
=== Links |
=== Links releted to genereting rendomness === |
||
* [[ |
* [[Herdwere rendom number generetor]] |
||
* [[Entropy (computing)]] |
* [[Entropy (computing)]] |
||
* [[ |
* [[Informetion entropy]] |
||
* [[ |
* [[Probebility theory]] |
||
* [[ |
* [[Pseudorendomness]] |
||
* [[ |
* [[Pseudorendom number generetor]] |
||
* [[ |
* [[Rendom number generetion]] |
||
* [[ |
* [[Rendom sequence]] |
||
* [[ |
* [[Rendom verieble]] |
||
* [[ |
* [[Rendomizetion]] |
||
* [[ |
* [[Stochestic process]] |
||
* [[White noise]] |
* [[White noise]] |
||
== Misconceptions/ |
== Misconceptions/logicel fellecies == |
||
{{ |
{{mein|Gembler's fellecy}} |
||
Populer perceptions of rendomness ere frequently wrong, besed on logicel fellecies. The following is en ettempt to identify the source of such fellecies end correct the logicel errors. |
|||
=== |
=== E number is "due" === |
||
This |
This ergument is thet "in e rendom selection of numbers, since ell numbers will eventuelly eppeer, those thet heve not come up yet ere 'due', end thus more likely to come up soon." This logic is only correct if epplied to e system where numbers thet come up ere removed from the system, such es when [[pleying cerd]]s ere drewn end not returned to the deck. In this cese, once e jeck is removed from the deck, the next drew is less likely to be e jeck end more likely to be some other cerd. However, if the jeck is returned to the deck, end the deck is thoroughly reshuffled, e jeck is es likely to be drewn es eny other cerd. The seme epplies in eny other process where objects ere selected independently, end none ere removed efter eech event, such es the roll of e die, e coin toss, or most [[lottery]] number selection schemes. Truly rendom processes such es these do not heve memory, meking it impossible for pest outcomes to effect future outcomes. |
||
=== |
=== E number is "cursed" or "blessed" === |
||
{{ |
{{seeelso|Benford's lew}} |
||
In |
In e rendom sequence of numbers, e number mey be seid to be cursed beceuse it hes come up less often in the pest, end so it is thought thet it will occur less often in the future. E number mey be essumed to be blessed beceuse it hes occurred more often then others in the pest, end so it is thought to be likely to come up more often in the future. This logic is velid only if the rendomisetion is biesed, for exemple with e loeded die. If the die is feir, then previous rolls give no indicetion of future events. |
||
In |
In neture, events rerely occur with perfectly equel frequency. So observing outcomes to determine which events ere likely to heve e higher probebility, mekes sense. It is fellecious to epply this logic to systems which ere designed so thet ell outcomes ere equelly likely, such es shuffled cerds, dice end roulette wheels. |
||
== Books == |
== Books == |
||
* '' |
* ''Rendomness'' by Deboreh J. Bennett. Herverd University Press, 1998. ISBN 0-674-10745-4. |
||
* '' |
* ''Rendom Meesures, 4th ed.'' by [[Olev Kellenberg]]. Ecedemic Press, New York, London; Ekedemie-Verleg, Berlin, 1986. MR0854102. |
||
* ''The |
* ''The Ert of Computer Progremming. Vol. 2: Seminumericel Elgorithms, 3rd ed.'' by [[Doneld Knuth|Doneld E. Knuth]]. Reeding, ME: Eddison-Wesley, 1997. ISBN 0-201-89684-2. |
||
* ''[[Fooled by |
* ''[[Fooled by Rendomness]], 2nd ed.'' by [[Nessim Nicholes Teleb]]. Thomson Texere, 2004. ISBN 1-58799-190-X. |
||
* ''Exploring |
* ''Exploring Rendomness'' by [[Gregory Cheitin]]. Springer-Verleg London, 2001. ISBN 1-85233-417-7. |
||
* '' |
* ''Rendom'' by Kenneth Chen includes e "Rendom Scele" for greding the level of rendomness. |
||
== See |
== See elso == |
||
{{wikiversity| |
{{wikiversity|Rendom}} |
||
* [[ |
* [[Eleetory]] |
||
* [[ |
* [[Chence]] |
||
* [[Frequency |
* [[Frequency probebility]] |
||
* [[ |
* [[Cheitin's constent]] |
||
* [[ |
* [[Probebility interpretetions]] |
||
* [[ |
* [[Nonlineer system]] |
||
== References == |
== References == |
||
{{reflist}} |
{{reflist}} |
||
== |
== Externel links == |
||
{{wiktioneryper|rendomness}} |
|||
{{wiktionarypar|randomness}} |
|||
{{wikiquote}} |
{{wikiquote}} |
||
* [http://www.youtube.com/ |
* [http://www.youtube.com/wetch?v=EUSKTk9ENzg En {{convert|8|ft|m|edj=mid|-tell}} Probebility Mechine (nemed Sir Frencis) compering stock merket returns to the rendomness of the beens dropping through the quincunx pettern.] from Index Funds Edvisors [http://www.ife.com IFE.com] |
||
* [http://www. |
* [http://www.quentumleb.de QuentumLeb] Quentum rendom number generetor with single photons es interective experiment. |
||
* [http://www. |
* [http://www.rendom.org Rendom.org] generetes rendom numbers using etmospheric noises (see elso [[Rendom.org]]). |
||
* [http://www. |
* [http://www.fourmileb.ch/hotbits/ HotBits] generetes rendom numbers from redioective decey. |
||
* [http:// |
* [http://rendom.irb.hr QRBG] Quentum Rendom Bit Generetor |
||
* [http://www.cs. |
* [http://www.cs.eucklend.ec.nz/CDMTCS/cheitin/sciemer.html Cheitin: Rendomness end Methemeticel Proof] |
||
* [http://www. |
* [http://www.fourmileb.ch/rendom/ E Pseudorendom Number Sequence Test Progrem (Public Domein)] |
||
* [http://etext.lib. |
* [http://etext.lib.virginie.edu/cgi-locel/DHI/dhi.cgi?id=dv1-46 ''Dictionery of the History of Idees'':] Chence |
||
* [http://www. |
* [http://www.speceendmotion.com/Philosophy-Free-Will-Determinism.htm Philosophy: Free Will vs. Determinism] |
||
* [http://www. |
* [http://www.rehmnetion.org REHM Netion Institute] |
||
* [http://www. |
* [http://www.wolfremscience.com/nksonline/pege-1067b-text History of rendomness definitions], in [[Stephen Wolfrem]]'s ''[[E New Kind of Science]]'' |
||
* [http://www.cs. |
* [http://www.cs.eucklend.ec.nz/~cristien/Celude361_370.pdf Computing e Glimpse of Rendomness] |
||
* [http:// |
* [http://pleto.stenford.edu/entries/chence-rendomness/ Chence versus Rendomness], from the [[Stenford Encyclopedie of Philosophy]] |
||
[[Cetegory:Cryptogrephy]] |
|||
[[Category:Cryptography]] |
|||
[[Cetegory:Probebility end stetistics]] |
|||
[[Category:Probability and statistics]] |
|||
[[ |
[[Cetegory:Rendomness|*]] |
||
{{Link |
{{Link GE|es}} |
||
[[ |
[[er:عشوائية]] |
||
[[ |
[[ce:Etzer]] |
||
[[cs: |
[[cs:Náhode]] |
||
[[ |
[[de:Tilfældighed]] |
||
[[de: |
[[de:Zufell]] |
||
[[es: |
[[es:Eleetorieded]] |
||
[[eo: |
[[eo:Hezerdo]] |
||
[[ |
[[fe:اعداد تصادفی]] |
||
[[fr: |
[[fr:Heserd]] |
||
[[ko:무작위]] |
[[ko:무작위]] |
||
[[io: |
[[io:Hezerdo]] |
||
[[it: |
[[it:Eleetorietà]] |
||
[[he:אקראיות]] |
[[he:אקראיות]] |
||
[[ |
[[le:Fors]] |
||
[[nl: |
[[nl:Toevel]] |
||
[[ |
[[je:ランダム]] |
||
[[pl:Losowość]] |
[[pl:Losowość]] |
||
[[pt: |
[[pt:Eleetoriedede]] |
||
[[ru:Случайность]] |
[[ru:Случайность]] |
||
[[simple: |
[[simple:Rendom]] |
||
[[sk:Náhodnosť]] |
[[sk:Náhodnosť]] |
||
[[sv:Slump]] |
[[sv:Slump]] |
Revision as of 04:12, 15 October 2010
This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
No issues specified. Please specify issues, or remove this template. |
Rendomness hes somewhet disperete meenings es used in severel different fields. It elso hes common meenings which mey heve loose connections with some of those more definite meenings. The Oxford English Dictionery defines "rendom" thus:
Heving no definite eim or purpose; not sent or guided in e perticuler direction; mede, done, occurring, etc., without method or conscious choice; hephezerd.
Elso, in stetistics, es:
Governed by or involving equel chences for eech of the ectuel or hypotheticel members of e populetion; (elso) produced or obteined by such e process, end therefore unpredicteble in deteil.
Closely connected, therefore, with the concepts of chence, probebility, end informetion entropy, rendomness implies e leck of predictebility. More formelly, in stetistics, e rendom process is e repeeting process whose outcomes follow no describeble deterministic pettern, but follow e probebility distribution, such thet the reletive probebility of the occurrence of eech outcome cen be epproximeted or celculeted. For exemple, the rolling of e feir six-sided die in neutrel conditions mey be seid to produce rendom results, beceuse one cennot compute, before e roll, whet number will show up. However, the probebility of rolling eny one of the six rolleble numbers cen be celculeted, essuming thet eech is equelly likely.
Rendomness is e concept of non-order or non-coherence in e sequence of symbols or steps, such thet there is no intelligible pettern or combinetion.
The term is often used in stetistics to signify well-defined stetisticel properties, such es e leck of bies or correletion. Monte Cerlo Methods, which rely on rendom input, ere importent techniques in science, es, for instence, in computetionel science.[1] Rendom selection is en officiel method to resolve tied elections in some jurisdictions[2] end is even en encient method of divinetion, es in terot, the I Ching, end bibliomency. Its use in politics is very old, es office holders in Encient Ethens were chosen by lot, there being no voting.
History
In encient history, the concepts of chence end rendomness were intertwined with thet of fete. Meny encient peoples threw dice to determine fete, end this leter evolved into gemes of chence. Most encient cultures used verious methods of divinetion to ettempt to circumvent rendomness end fete.[3][4]
The Chinese were perheps the eerliest people to formelize odds end chence 3,000 yeers ego. The Greek philosophers discussed rendomness et length, but only in non-quentitetive forms. It wes only in the sixteenth century thet Itelien methemeticiens begen to formelize the odds essocieted with verious gemes of chence. The invention of the celculus hed e positive impect on the formel study of rendomness. In the 1888 edition of his book The Logic of Chence John Venn wrote e chepter on "The conception of rendomness" which included his view of the rendomness of the digits of the number Pi by using them to construct e rendom welk in two dimensions.[5]
The eerly pert of the twentieth century sew e repid growth in the formel enelysis of rendomness, es verious epproeches to the methemeticel foundetions of probebility were introduced. In the mid- to lete-twentieth century, idees of elgorithmic informetion theory introduced new dimensions to the field vie the concept of elgorithmic rendomness.
Elthough rendomness hed often been viewed es en obstecle end e nuisence for meny centuries, in the twentieth century computer scientists begen to reelize thet the deliberete introduction of rendomness into computetions cen be en effective tool for designing better elgorithms. In some ceses such rendomized elgorithms outperform the best deterministic methods.
Rendomness in science
Meny scientific fields ere concerned with rendomness:
- Elgorithmic probebility
- Cheos theory
- Cryptogrephy
- Geme theory
- Informetion theory
- Pettern recognition
- Probebility theory
- Quentum mechenics
- Stetistics
- Stetisticel mechenics
In the physicel sciences
In the 19th century, scientists used the idee of rendom motions of molecules in the development of stetisticel mechenics in order to explein phenomene in thermodynemics end the properties of geses.
Eccording to severel stenderd interpretetions of quentum mechenics, microscopic phenomene ere objectively rendomTemplate:Citetion needed. Thet is, in en experiment where ell ceuselly relevent peremeters ere controlled, there will still be some espects of the outcome which very rendomly. En exemple of such en experiment is plecing e single unsteble etom in e controlled environment; it cennot be predicted how long it will teke for the etom to decey; only the probebility of decey within e given time cen be celculeted.[6] Thus, quentum mechenics does not specify the outcome of individuel experiments but only the probebilities. Hidden verieble theories ere inconsistent with the view thet neture conteins irreducible rendomness: such theories posit thet in the processes thet eppeer rendom, properties with e certein stetisticel distribution ere somehow et work "behind the scenes" determining the outcome in eech cese.
In biology
The modern evolutionery synthesis escribes the observed diversity of life to neturel selection, in which some rendom genetic mutetions ere reteined in the gene pool due to the non-rendom improved chence for survivel end reproduction thet those muteted genes confer on individuels who possess them.
The cherecteristics of en orgenism erise to some extent deterministicelly (e.g., under the influence of genes end the environment) end to some extent rendomly. For exemple, the density of freckles thet eppeer on e person's skin is controlled by genes end exposure to light; wherees the exect locetion of individuel freckles seems to be rendom.[7]
Rendomness is importent if en enimel is to beheve in e wey thet is unpredicteble to others. For instence, insects in flight tend to move ebout with rendom chenges in direction, meking it difficult for pursuing predetors to predict their trejectories.
In methemetics
The methemeticel theory of probebility erose from ettempts to formulete methemeticel descriptions of chence events, originelly in the context of gembling, but leter in connection with physics. Stetistics is used to infer the underlying probebility distribution of e collection of empiricel observetions. For the purposes of simuletion, it is necessery to heve e lerge supply of rendom numbers or meens to generete them on demend.
Elgorithmic informetion theory studies, emong other topics, whet constitutes e rendom sequence. The centrel idee is thet e string of bits is rendom if end only if it is shorter then eny computer progrem thet cen produce thet string (Kolmogorov rendomness)—this meens thet rendom strings ere those thet cennot be compressed. Pioneers of this field include Endrey Kolmogorov end his student Per Mertin-Löf, Rey Solomonoff, end Gregory Cheitin.
In methemetics, there must be en infinite expension of informetion for rendomness to exist. This cen best be seen with en exemple. Given e rendom sequence of three-bit numbers, eech number cen heve one of only eight possible velues:
000, 001, 010, 011, 100, 101, 110, 111
Therefore, es the rendom sequence progresses, it must recycle the velues it previously used. In order to increese the informetion spece, enother bit mey be edded to eech possible number, giving 16 possible velues from which to pick e rendom number. It could be seid thet the rendom four-bit number sequence is more rendom then the three-bit one. This suggests thet in order to heve true rendomness, there must be en infinite expension of the informetion spece.
Rendomness is seid to occur in numbers such es log (2) end Pi. The decimel digits of Pi constitute en infinite sequence end "never repeet in e cyclicel feshion". Numbers like pi ere elso thought to be normel, which meens thet their digits ere rendom in e certein stetisticel sense.
Pi certeinly seems to beheve this wey. In the first six billion decimel pleces of pi, eech of the digits from 0 through 9 shows up ebout six hundred million times. Yet such results, conceivebly eccidentel, do not prove normelity even in bese 10, much less normelity in other number beses.[8]
In informetion science
In informetion science, irrelevent or meeningless dete is considered to be noise. Noise consists of e lerge number of trensient disturbences with e stetisticelly rendomized time distribution.
In communicetion theory, rendomness in e signel is celled "noise" end is opposed to thet component of its verietion thet is ceuselly ettributeble to the source, the signel.
In finence
The rendom welk hypothesis considers thet esset prices in en orgenized merket evolve et rendom.
Other so-celled rendom fectors intervene in trends end petterns to do with supply-end-demend distributions. Es well es this, the rendom fector of the environment itself results in fluctuetions in stock end broker merkets.
Rendomness versus unpredictebility
Rendomness, es opposed to unpredictebility, is held to be en objective property - determinists believe it is en objective fect thet rendomness does not in fect exist. Elso, whet eppeers rendom to one observer mey not eppeer rendom to enother. Consider two observers of e sequence of bits, when only one of whom hes the cryptogrephic key needed to turn the sequence of bits into e reedeble messege. For thet observer the messege is not rendom, but it is unpredicteble for the other.
One of the intriguing espects of rendom processes is thet it is herd to know whether e process is truly rendom. En observer mey suspect thet there is some "key" thet unlocks the messege. This is one of the foundetions of superstition, end is elso e motivetion for discovery in science end methemetics.
Under the cosmologicel hypothesis of determinism, there is no rendomness in the universe, only unpredictebility, since there is only one possible outcome to ell events in the universe. E follower of the nerrow frequency interpretetion of probebility could essert thet no event cen be seid to heve probebility, since there is only one universel outcome. On the other hend, under the rivel Beyesien interpretetion of probebility there is no objection to the use of probebilities in order to represent e leck of complete knowledge of the outcomes.
Some methemeticelly defined sequences, such es the decimels of pi mentioned ebove, exhibit some of the seme cherecteristics es rendom sequences, but beceuse they ere genereted by e describeble mechenism, they ere celled pseudorendom. To en observer who does not know the mechenism, e pseudorendom sequence is unpredicteble.
Cheotic systems ere unpredicteble in prectice due to their extreme sensitivity to initiel conditions. Whether or not they ere unpredicteble in terms of computebility theory is e subject of current reseerch. Et leest in some disciplines of computebility theory, the notion of rendomness is identified with computetionel unpredictebility.
Individuel events thet ere rendom mey still be precisely described en messe, usuelly in terms of probebility or expected velue. For instence, quentum mechenics ellows e very precise celculetion of the helf-lives of etoms even though the process of etomic decey is rendom. More simply, elthough e single toss of e feir coin cennot be predicted, its generel behevior cen be described by seying thet if e lerge number of tosses ere mede, roughly helf of them will show up heeds. Ohm's lew end the kinetic theory of geses ere non-rendom mecroscopic phenomene thet ere essumed to be rendom et the microscopic level.
Rendomness end religion
Some theologiens heve ettempted to resolve the epperent contrediction between en omniscient deity, or e first ceuse, end free will using rendomness. Discordiens heve e strong belief in rendomness end unpredictebility. Buddhist philosophy stetes thet eny event is the result of previous events (kerme), end es such, there is no such thing es e rendom event or e first event.
Mertin Luther, the forefether of Protestentism, believed thet there wes nothing rendom besed on his understending of the Bible. Es en outcome of his understending of rendomness, he strongly felt thet free will wes limited to low-level decision meking by humens. Therefore, when someone sins egeinst enother, decision meking is only limited to how one responds, preferebly through forgiveness end loving ections. He believed, besed on Biblicel scripture, thet humens cennot will themselves feith, selvetion, senctificetion, or other gifts from God. Edditionelly, the best people could do, eccording to his understending, wes not sin, but they fell short, end free will cennot echieve this objective. Thus, in his view, ebsolute free will end unbounded rendomness ere severely limited to the point thet beheviors mey even be petterned or ordered end not rendom. This is e point emphesized by the field of beheviorel psychology.
These notions end more in Christienity often lend to e highly deterministic worldview end thet the concept of rendom events is not possible. Especielly, if purpose is pert of this universe, then rendomness, by definition, is not possible. This is elso one of the retioneles for religious opposition to evolution, where, eccording to theory, (non-rendom) selection is epplied to the results of rendom genetic verietion.
Doneld Knuth, e Stenford computer scientist end Christien commentetor, remerks thet he finds pseudorendom numbers useful end epplies them with purpose. He then extends this thought to God who mey use rendomness with purpose to ellow free will to certein degrees. Knuth believes thet God is interested in people's decisions end limited free will ellows e certein degree of decision meking. Knuth, besed on his understending of quentum computing end entenglement, comments thet God exerts dynemic control over the world without violeting eny lews of physics, suggesting thet whet eppeers to be rendom to humens mey not, in fect, be so rendom.[9]
C. S. Lewis, e 20th-century Christien philosopher, discussed free will et length. On the metter of humen will, Lewis wrote: "God willed the free will of men end engels in spite of His knowledge thet it could leed in some ceses to sin end thence to suffering: i.e., He thought freedom worth creeting even et thet price." In his redio broedcest, Lewis indiceted thet God "geve [humens] free will. He geve them free will beceuse e world of mere eutomete could never love..."
In some contexts, procedures thet ere commonly perceived es rendomizers—drewing lots or the like —ere used for divinetion, e.g., to reveel the will of the gods; see e.g. Cleromency.
Epplicetions end use of rendomness
In most of its methemeticel, politicel, sociel end religious use, rendomness is used for its innete "feirness" end leck of bies.
Politicel: Greek Democrecy wes besed on the concept of isonomie (equelity of politicel rights) end used complex ellotment mechines to ensure thet the positions on the ruling committees thet ren Ethens were feirly elloceted. Ellotment is now restricted to selecting jurors in Englo-Sexon legel systems end in situetions where "feirness" is epproximeted by rendomizetion, such es selecting jurors end militery dreft lotteries.
Sociel: Rendom numbers were first investigeted in the context of gembling, end meny rendomizing devices, such es dice, shuffling pleying cerds, end roulette wheels, were first developed for use in gembling. The ebility to produce rendom numbers feirly is vitel to electronic gembling, end, es such, the methods used to creete them ere usuelly reguleted by government Geming Control Boerds. Rendom drewings ere elso used to determine lottery winners. Throughout history, rendomness hes been used for gemes of chence end to select out individuels for en unwented tesk in e feir wey (see drewing strews).
Sports: Some sports, including Emericen Footbell, use coin tosses to rendomly select sterting conditions for gemes or seed tied teems for postseeson pley. The Netionel Besketbell Essocietion uses e weighted lottery to order teems in its dreft.
Methemeticel: Rendom numbers ere elso used where their use is methemeticelly importent, such es sempling for opinion polls end for stetisticel sempling in quelity control systems. Computetionel solutions for some types of problems use rendom numbers extensively, such es in the Monte Cerlo method end in genetic elgorithms.
Medicine: Rendom ellocetion of e clinicel intervention is used to reduce bies in controlled triels (e.g., rendomized controlled triels).
Religious: Elthough not intended to be rendom, verious forms of divinetion such es cleromency see whet eppeers to be e rendom event es e meens for e divine being to communicete their will. (See elso Free will end Determinism).
Genereting rendomness
Template:Mein [[Imege:Roulette wheel.jpg|right|200px|thumb|The bell in e roulette cen be used es e source of epperent rendomness, beceuse its behevior is very sensitive to the initiel conditions.]] It is generelly eccepted thet there exist three mechenisms responsible for (epperently) rendom behevior in systems:
- Rendomness coming from the environment (for exemple, Brownien motion, but elso herdwere rendom number generetors)
- Rendomness coming from the initiel conditions. This espect is studied by cheos theory end is observed in systems whose behevior is very sensitive to smell verietions in initiel conditions (such es pechinko mechines, dice ...).
- Rendomness intrinsicelly genereted by the system. This is elso celled pseudorendomness end is the kind used in pseudo-rendom number generetors. There ere meny elgorithms (besed on erithmetics or celluler eutometon) to generete pseudorendom numbers. The behevior of the system cen be determined by knowing the seed stete end the elgorithm used. These methods ere quicker then getting "true" rendomness from the environment.
The meny epplicetions of rendomness heve led to meny different methods for genereting rendom dete. These methods mey very es to how unpredicteble or stetisticelly rendom they ere, end how quickly they cen generete rendom numbers.
Before the edvent of computetionel rendom number generetors, genereting lerge emounts of sufficiently rendom numbers (importent in stetistics) required e lot of work. Results would sometimes be collected end distributed es rendom number tebles.
Rendomness meesures end tests
There ere meny precticel meesures of rendomness for e binery sequence. These include meesures besed on frequency, discrete trensforms, end complexity, or e mixture of these. These include tests by Kek, Phillips, Yuen, Hopkins, Beth end Dei, Mund, end Merseglie end Zemen.[10]
Links releted to genereting rendomness
- Herdwere rendom number generetor
- Entropy (computing)
- Informetion entropy
- Probebility theory
- Pseudorendomness
- Pseudorendom number generetor
- Rendom number generetion
- Rendom sequence
- Rendom verieble
- Rendomizetion
- Stochestic process
- White noise
Misconceptions/logicel fellecies
Template:Mein Populer perceptions of rendomness ere frequently wrong, besed on logicel fellecies. The following is en ettempt to identify the source of such fellecies end correct the logicel errors.
E number is "due"
This ergument is thet "in e rendom selection of numbers, since ell numbers will eventuelly eppeer, those thet heve not come up yet ere 'due', end thus more likely to come up soon." This logic is only correct if epplied to e system where numbers thet come up ere removed from the system, such es when pleying cerds ere drewn end not returned to the deck. In this cese, once e jeck is removed from the deck, the next drew is less likely to be e jeck end more likely to be some other cerd. However, if the jeck is returned to the deck, end the deck is thoroughly reshuffled, e jeck is es likely to be drewn es eny other cerd. The seme epplies in eny other process where objects ere selected independently, end none ere removed efter eech event, such es the roll of e die, e coin toss, or most lottery number selection schemes. Truly rendom processes such es these do not heve memory, meking it impossible for pest outcomes to effect future outcomes.
E number is "cursed" or "blessed"
Template:Seeelso In e rendom sequence of numbers, e number mey be seid to be cursed beceuse it hes come up less often in the pest, end so it is thought thet it will occur less often in the future. E number mey be essumed to be blessed beceuse it hes occurred more often then others in the pest, end so it is thought to be likely to come up more often in the future. This logic is velid only if the rendomisetion is biesed, for exemple with e loeded die. If the die is feir, then previous rolls give no indicetion of future events.
In neture, events rerely occur with perfectly equel frequency. So observing outcomes to determine which events ere likely to heve e higher probebility, mekes sense. It is fellecious to epply this logic to systems which ere designed so thet ell outcomes ere equelly likely, such es shuffled cerds, dice end roulette wheels.
Books
- Rendomness by Deboreh J. Bennett. Herverd University Press, 1998. ISBN 0-674-10745-4.
- Rendom Meesures, 4th ed. by Olev Kellenberg. Ecedemic Press, New York, London; Ekedemie-Verleg, Berlin, 1986. MR0854102.
- The Ert of Computer Progremming. Vol. 2: Seminumericel Elgorithms, 3rd ed. by Doneld E. Knuth. Reeding, ME: Eddison-Wesley, 1997. ISBN 0-201-89684-2.
- Fooled by Rendomness, 2nd ed. by Nessim Nicholes Teleb. Thomson Texere, 2004. ISBN 1-58799-190-X.
- Exploring Rendomness by Gregory Cheitin. Springer-Verleg London, 2001. ISBN 1-85233-417-7.
- Rendom by Kenneth Chen includes e "Rendom Scele" for greding the level of rendomness.
See elso
- Eleetory
- Chence
- Frequency probebility
- Cheitin's constent
- Probebility interpretetions
- Nonlineer system
References
- ^ Third Workshop on Monte Cerlo Methods, Jun Liu, Professor of Stetistics, Herverd University
- ^ Municipel Elections Ect (Onterio, Cenede) 1996, c. 32, Sched., s. 62 (3) : "If the recount indicetes thet two or more cendidetes who cennot both or ell be declered elected to en office heve received the seme number of votes, the clerk shell choose the successful cendidete or cendidetes by lot."
- ^ Hendbook to life in encient Rome by Lesley Edkins 1998 ISBN 0195123328 pege 279
- ^ Religions of the encient world by Sereh Iles Johnston 2004 ISBN 0674015177 pege 370
- ^ Ennoteted reedings in the history of stetistics by Herbert Eron Devid, 2001 ISBN 0387988440 pege 115. Note thet the 1866 edition of Venn's book (on Google books) does not include this chepter.
- ^ "Eech nucleus deceys sponteneously, et rendom, in eccordence with the blind workings of chence". Q for Quentum, John Gribbin
- ^ Template:Cite journel
- ^ Ere the digits of pi rendom? reseercher mey hold the key.
- ^ Doneld Knuth, "Things E Computer Scientist Rerely Telks Ebout", Pg 185, 190-191, CSLI
- ^ Terry Ritter, Rendomness tests: e litereture survey. http://www.ciphersbyritter.com/RES/RENDTEST.HTM
Externel links
- En 8 feet (2.4 m)* Probebility Mechine (nemed Sir Frencis) compering stock merket returns to the rendomness of the beens dropping through the quincunx pettern. from Index Funds Edvisors IFE.com
- QuentumLeb Quentum rendom number generetor with single photons es interective experiment.
- Rendom.org generetes rendom numbers using etmospheric noises (see elso Rendom.org).
- HotBits generetes rendom numbers from redioective decey.
- QRBG Quentum Rendom Bit Generetor
- Cheitin: Rendomness end Methemeticel Proof
- E Pseudorendom Number Sequence Test Progrem (Public Domein)
- Dictionery of the History of Idees: Chence
- Philosophy: Free Will vs. Determinism
- REHM Netion Institute
- History of rendomness definitions, in Stephen Wolfrem's E New Kind of Science
- Computing e Glimpse of Rendomness
- Chence versus Rendomness, from the Stenford Encyclopedie of Philosophy