Talk:Costoboci: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 11:55, 15 October 2010

Romania Start‑class

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Romania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Romania-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomaniaWikipedia:WikiProject RomaniaTemplate:WikiProject RomaniaRomania articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
- Help Romania reach at least GA-status
- Help History of Romania get WP:GOOD
- Request an article or create a missing one
Assess :
- Assess all articles tagged for this project that have not been assessed for quality
Cleanup :
- Review the Romania-related cleanup listing
- Normalize the use of "Northern Bukovina" (capitalized) and "Northern Bessarabia" (Bessarabian part of Chernivtsi Oblast) all over Wikipedia
Disambiguation :
- Disambiguate project articles and get points
Expand :
- Expand Postage stamps and postal history of Romania
Translate :
- Translate Romania-related articles from the Romanian Wikipedia
- Translate and keep in sync with the project versions in other languages: Projet:Roumanie (in French), Proiect:România (in Romanian), Проект:Румыния (in Russian)
Unreferenced : * Add more reference to FC CFR Timișoara.
Other :
- Make use in articles of the newly contributed images (about 5800!!) from the Wiki Loves Monuments Romania 2011 (WLM Romania external site)
- Review newly created Romania-related articles
- Check the articles needing expert attention or other work, and help with some of the items
- Create Awards for WikiProject Romania
- Contribute photos related to Romania at Commons:WikiProject Romania. Organize Romania related images on Commons. See also media-related tasks

Ethnic groups Start‑class

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Ethnic groups open tasks:

Here are some open WikiProject Ethnic groups tasks:

Meta-tasks:
- Place the {{Ethnic groups}} template on the talk page of articles within the scope of this project.
- Resolve the disparity in importance rankings among different ethnic groups
Articles about ethnic groups that currently have issues needing resolution:
Start an article:
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groups/Article requests

Feel free to edit this list or discuss these tasks.

European history Start‑class

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Costobocii-Dacians

Ptolemy i think mention them among his list of Dacian tribes, as well acording with < Ancient Illyria : an archaeological exploration Arthur Evans, Publisher: London Tauris 2006 (Texts and introduction originally published in various sources, 1885-1976) / Archaeologia, or, Miscellaneous tracts relating to antiquity by Society of Antiquaries of London: The Society of Antiquaries of London, 1770 ISSN: 0261-3409> and with <The provinces of the Roman empire from Caesar to Diocletian, by Theodore Mommsen, Translated with the author's additions, by William P. Dickson, London, Macmillan, 1909.> the names of Costobocii king, Pieporus, as well other names related with them, as Bithoporus (another Costoboci king) and Natoporus, are all Dacian names.
the fact that they are show in Sarmatia too, first by Pliny the Elder, must be either a confusion, either the fact that during Burebista expansion in east (when he conquered and incorporated in his empire city of Olbia, near Crimeea), some Dacian tribes moved more in east as well (logical, especialy since they are first mentioned exactly in that period).

Pliny the Elder didnt clearly say they are Sarmatians, but that they live there. This doesnt mean they are really Sarmatians, but can be as much as well Dacians. Sarmatia wasnt a country or a kingdom with a well established ethnicity, but a teritory named like that inhabited by several diferent peoples.

Lipita culture is considered Dacian as well, which need to be mentioned too on article
That text mentioning Zia, the Dacian wife of Pieporus can be interpretated that maybe he had a Sarmatian or Germanic wife too (it wasnt uncommon to have more then one wife, such habit of Thracians are mentioned by Herodotus as well), or that pure and simple a statement of their Dacian ethnicity, since all names mentioned in that inscription are Dacian

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 {{Ethnic groups|importance=|class=start|needs-infobox=}}
 {{eurohist|class=start|importance=}}
+== Costobocii-Dacians ==
+*Ptolemy i think mention them among his list of Dacian tribes, as well acording with < Ancient Illyria : an archaeological exploration Arthur Evans, Publisher: London Tauris 2006 (Texts and introduction originally published in various sources, 1885-1976) / Archaeologia, or, Miscellaneous tracts relating to antiquity by Society of Antiquaries of London: The Society of Antiquaries of London, 1770 ISSN: 0261-3409> and with <The provinces of the Roman empire from Caesar to Diocletian, by Theodore Mommsen, Translated with the author's additions, by William P. Dickson, London, Macmillan, 1909.> the names of Costobocii king, Pieporus, as well other names related with them, as Bithoporus (another Costoboci king) and Natoporus, are all Dacian names.
+*the fact that they are show in Sarmatia too, first by Pliny the Elder, must be either a confusion, either the fact that during Burebista expansion in east (when he conquered and incorporated in his empire city of Olbia, near Crimeea), some Dacian tribes moved more in east as well (logical, especialy since they are first mentioned exactly in that period).
+Pliny the Elder didnt clearly say they are Sarmatians, but that they live there. This doesnt mean they are really Sarmatians, but can be as much as well Dacians. Sarmatia wasnt a country or a kingdom with a well established ethnicity, but a teritory named like that inhabited by several diferent peoples.
+*Lipita culture is considered Dacian as well, which need to be mentioned too on article
+*That text mentioning Zia, the Dacian wife of Pieporus can be interpretated that maybe he had a Sarmatian or Germanic wife too (it wasnt uncommon to have more then one wife, such habit of Thracians are mentioned by Herodotus as well), or that pure and simple a statement of their Dacian ethnicity, since all names mentioned in that inscription are Dacian