Wikipedia talk:Stub: Difference between revisions
m Reverted 1 edit by 123.200.217.107 (talk) identified as vandalism to last revision by MiszaBot II. (TW) |
YEEAH BOIII |
||
Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
A high proportion of stub templates have embedded wikilinks which are either ordinary dictionary words (e.g [[history]] in <nowiki>{{Asia-hist-stub}})</nowiki>, or very low value in themselves (e.g. [[Africa]] in <nowiki>{{Africa-bio-stub}})</nowiki>, or is a technical term that's almost certainly already linked in the article itself (e.g. <nowiki>{{Lycaenidae-stub}}</nowiki>). It seems to me that the vast majority of links in stub templates add no value, so I plan to set about unlinking them. Any comments? [[User:Colonies Chris|Colonies Chris]] ([[User talk:Colonies Chris|talk]]) 09:22, 14 October 2010 (UTC) |
A high proportion of stub templates have embedded wikilinks which are either ordinary dictionary words (e.g [[history]] in <nowiki>{{Asia-hist-stub}})</nowiki>, or very low value in themselves (e.g. [[Africa]] in <nowiki>{{Africa-bio-stub}})</nowiki>, or is a technical term that's almost certainly already linked in the article itself (e.g. <nowiki>{{Lycaenidae-stub}}</nowiki>). It seems to me that the vast majority of links in stub templates add no value, so I plan to set about unlinking them. Any comments? [[User:Colonies Chris|Colonies Chris]] ([[User talk:Colonies Chris|talk]]) 09:22, 14 October 2010 (UTC) |
||
I'm editin yo pages, snatchin yo grammer up, trin to rape it so ya need ta hide ya kids, hide ya wife, and hide ya husband cuz they vandalizin errybody out here. |
Revision as of 15:11, 3 November 2010
Stub sorting | ||||
|
Manual of Style | ||||||||||
|
Wikipedia Help Project‑class | |||||||
|
This page has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
Index
|
||||||||||||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Are articles with little free text but long tables stubs or not?
I started cleaning the Wikipedia:Database reports/Long stubs and a bunch of the articles there are litte free text but lots of big tables articles, such as 2004–05 Florida Gators men's basketball team. I am not sure whether they are stubs (due to little free text) or not (due to their long and extensive tables). Thoughts? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 20:53, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
- I would say not. They have significant amount of useful content. Rich Farmbrough, 02:31, 5 May 2010 (UTC).
Move
Wikipedia:Stub → Wikipedia:Manual of Style (stub) — Consolidating naming per Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style#Poll Gnevin (talk) 16:22, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose; per my comment at the relevant discussion at MOS talk, this page has no useful style guidance and should be branded as an editing guideline. Christopher Parham (talk) 18:54, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
- Fine with me , remove from the MOS so Gnevin (talk) 19:55, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose. Not a style issue. -- Ϫ 09:43, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose: Per Chris, should simply be rebranded an editing guideline.—DCGeist (talk) 19:44, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
Al Ateeqi العتيقي
Alateeqi are a very old noble family, with many historic leaders in religion, politics, business, sciences, and literature whom have contributed greatly to the history and events of the Middle east specifically and the Islamic world generally in many ways. please visit their web site at Alateeqi.com for details concerning their family tree history, biographies of historic figures, historic scrolls and documents, as well as many other academic articles that contain never before seen information about famous political, religious and other leaders.MTSA (talk) 22:41, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
This stub article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.
v • d • e —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.60.144.167 (talk) 01:02, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
</ref> http://alateeqi.com/MTSA (talk) 22:41, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
MTSA (talk) 22:21, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
Valueless links in stub templates
A high proportion of stub templates have embedded wikilinks which are either ordinary dictionary words (e.g history in {{Asia-hist-stub}}), or very low value in themselves (e.g. Africa in {{Africa-bio-stub}}), or is a technical term that's almost certainly already linked in the article itself (e.g. {{Lycaenidae-stub}}). It seems to me that the vast majority of links in stub templates add no value, so I plan to set about unlinking them. Any comments? Colonies Chris (talk) 09:22, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
I'm editin yo pages, snatchin yo grammer up, trin to rape it so ya need ta hide ya kids, hide ya wife, and hide ya husband cuz they vandalizin errybody out here.