User talk:Yourmanstan

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Lo-jack-logo.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Lo-jack-logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 20:58, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Corporatocracy

This article could have been deleted as an expired PROD, but in view of its long history and number of contributors, and the fact that there are corresponding articles on a number of other Wikipedias, I have taken it to AfD to get more opinions. I am notifying you because you have contributed to the article. Your views are welcome at WP:Articles for deletion/Corporatocracy. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 13:40, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Federal Reserve System editwarring

FYI - you are beyond the [[WP:3RR] revert limit on the Federal Reserve System article. 1, 2, 3, 4. Do not readd the material without getting concensus on the talk page. Multiple editor have repeatedly disagreed with you about the SAME edit in the past. Any more reversions and I will post this on the edit war noticeboard. This is not acceptable. Ravensfire (talk) 21:29, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

I am aware of the rule... I have reverted exactly three times, and no more. Having yourself and one other disagree with me is no more justification than the fact that several others do agree with me. Secondly there is new information which you crystallizes the issue which you disregarded. I will revert tomorrow or try to find some other compromise if you all do not make some accommodation for reality. Thirdly, Your and Dark Charle's actions very closely match the characteristics of WP:GANG and is not acceptable. If you all do not find a fair compromise then I will bring it to the attention of the administrators' noticeboard.