Jump to content

Philadelphia Experiment: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 83: Line 83:
According to Vallée, a Navy veteran who served on board the USS ''Engstrom'' noted that the ''Eldridge'' might indeed have travelled from Philadelphia to Norfolk and back again in a single day at a time when merchant ships could not: by use of the [[Chesapeake and Delaware Canal]] and the [[Chesapeake Bay]], which at the time was open only to naval vessels.<ref name="scientificexploration.org"/> Use of that channel was kept quiet: German submarines had ravaged shipping along the East Coast during [[Operation Drumbeat]], and thus military ships unable to protect themselves were secretly moved via canals to avoid the threat.<ref name="ReferenceA">[http://www.scientificexploration.org/jse/abstracts/v8n1a2.php abstract of "Anatomy of a Hoax: The Philadelphia Experiment Fifty Years Later"] by Jacques F. Vallee, URL accessed February 21, 2007</ref> It should be noted that this same veteran claims to be the man that Allende witnessed “disappearing” at a bar. He claims that when the fight broke out, friendly barmaids whisked him out the back door of the bar before the police arrived, because he was under age for drinking. They then covered for him by claiming that he had disappeared.<ref name="ReferenceA"/>
According to Vallée, a Navy veteran who served on board the USS ''Engstrom'' noted that the ''Eldridge'' might indeed have travelled from Philadelphia to Norfolk and back again in a single day at a time when merchant ships could not: by use of the [[Chesapeake and Delaware Canal]] and the [[Chesapeake Bay]], which at the time was open only to naval vessels.<ref name="scientificexploration.org"/> Use of that channel was kept quiet: German submarines had ravaged shipping along the East Coast during [[Operation Drumbeat]], and thus military ships unable to protect themselves were secretly moved via canals to avoid the threat.<ref name="ReferenceA">[http://www.scientificexploration.org/jse/abstracts/v8n1a2.php abstract of "Anatomy of a Hoax: The Philadelphia Experiment Fifty Years Later"] by Jacques F. Vallee, URL accessed February 21, 2007</ref> It should be noted that this same veteran claims to be the man that Allende witnessed “disappearing” at a bar. He claims that when the fight broke out, friendly barmaids whisked him out the back door of the bar before the police arrived, because he was under age for drinking. They then covered for him by claiming that he had disappeared.<ref name="ReferenceA"/>


In 2004, additional details of the Philadelphia Experiment story were put forth in the story [http://www.americanantigravity.com/documents/Einstein-Antigravity.pdf Einstein's Antigravity]. This story document a number of new claims by defense-scientist John Dering that are believed by many to make the Philadelphia Experiment story more plausible. First, Dering asserts to have worked with William Moore (original co-author of "The Philadelphia Experiment: Project Invisibility), and to know from this relationship with Moore that the pseudonym "Reinhart" was in fact the real surname for the scientist interviewed about Einstein's Unified Field Theory in the book. Dering further asserts that a Dr. Reinhart was assigned to the Philadephia Naval Yard in 1943 as a naval degaussing specialist, and indicates that Albert Einstein's FBI file also places that scientist in the Philadelphia Naval Yard during the same period as "working on a device to explode a torpedo under a ship".
In 2004, additional details of the Philadelphia Experiment story were put forth in the story [http://www.americanantigravity.com/documents/Einstein-Antigravity.pdf Einstein's Antigravity]. This story documents a number of new claims by defense-scientist John Dering that are believed by many to make the Philadelphia Experiment story more plausible. First, Dering asserts to have worked with William Moore (original co-author of "The Philadelphia Experiment: Project Invisibility), and to know from this relationship with Moore that the pseudonym "Reinhart" was in fact the real surname for the scientist interviewed about Einstein's Unified Field Theory in the book. Dering further asserts that a Dr. Reinhart was assigned to the Philadephia Naval Yard in 1943 as a naval degaussing specialist, and indicates that Albert Einstein's FBI file also places that scientist in the Philadelphia Naval Yard during the same period as "working on a device to explode a torpedo under a ship".


Dering offers significant further research, including speculation that Al Bielek learned the technical details of the project from a booklet published by Dr. James Corum at a 1994 Colorado Springs Tesla Symposium in 1994 entitled, [http://www.arcsandsparks.com/teslapage.html "Tesla's Egg of Columbus, Radar Stealth, the Torsion Tensor, and the 'Philadelphia Experiment'"].
Dering offers significant further research, including speculation that Al Bielek learned the technical details of the project from a booklet published by Dr. James Corum at a 1994 Colorado Springs Tesla Symposium in 1994 entitled, [http://www.arcsandsparks.com/teslapage.html "Tesla's Egg of Columbus, Radar Stealth, the Torsion Tensor, and the 'Philadelphia Experiment'"].

Revision as of 23:37, 29 November 2010

USS Eldridge (DE-173) ca. 1944

The Philadelphia Experiment is the name given to a naval military experiment which was supposedly carried out at the Philadelphia Naval Shipyard in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, sometime around October 28, 1943. It is alleged that the U.S. Navy destroyer escort USS Eldridge was to be rendered invisible (or "cloaked") to enemy devices. The experiment is also referred to as Project Rainbow.

The story is widely regarded as a hoax.[1][2][3] The U.S. Navy maintains that no such experiment occurred, and details of the story contradict well-established facts about the Eldridge, as well as the known laws of physics.[4] Nonetheless, the story has captured imaginations in conspiracy theory circles, and elements of the Philadelphia Experiment are featured in other government conspiracy theories.

Synopsis

Notice: Several different and sometimes contradictory versions of the alleged experiment have circulated over the years. The following synopsis illustrates key story points common to most accounts.[2]

The experiment was allegedly based on an aspect of the unified field theory, a term coined by Albert Einstein. The Unified Field Theory aims to describe mathematically and physically the interrelated nature of the forces that comprise electromagnetic radiation and gravity, although to date, no single theory has successfully expressed these relationships in viable mathematical or physical terms.

According to the accounts, it was believed that some version of this Unified Field Theory would enable the Navy to use large electrical generators to bend light around an object so that it became completely invisible. The Navy would have regarded this as being of obvious military value, and according to the accounts, subsequently it sponsored the experiment.

Another version of the story proposes that researchers were preparing magnetic and gravitational measurements of the seafloor to detect anomalies, supposedly based on Einstein's attempts to understand gravity. In this version there were also related secret experiments in Nazi Germany to find antigravity, allegedly led by SS-Obergruppenführer Hans Kammler.

In most accounts of the experiment, the destroyer escort USS Eldridge was fitted with the required equipment at the Philadelphia Naval Yard. Testing began in the summer of 1943, and it was supposedly successful to a limited degree. One test, on July 22, 1943, resulted in the Eldridge being rendered almost completely invisible, with some witnesses reporting a "greenish fog" appearing in its place. However, crew members supposedly complained of severe nausea afterwards. Also, it is said that when the ship reappeared, some sailors were embedded in the metal structures of the ship, including one sailor who ended up on a deck level below that where he began, and had his hand embedded in the steel hull of the ship.[5] At that point, it is said that the experiment was altered at the request of the Navy, with the new objective being solely to render the Eldridge invisible to radar. None of these allegations have been independently substantiated to any satisfactory degree.

The conjecture then alleges that the equipment was not properly re-calibrated, but in spite of this, the experiment was repeated on October 28, 1943. This time, the Eldridge not only became invisible, but she physically vanished from the area in a flash of blue light and teleported to Norfolk, Virginia, over 200 miles away. It is claimed that the Eldridge sat for some time in full view of men aboard the ship SS Andrew Furuseth, whereupon the Eldridge vanished from their sight, and then reappeared in Philadelphia at the site it had originally occupied. It was also said that the warship travelled back in time for about 10 seconds.

Many versions of the tale include descriptions of serious side effects for the crew. Some crew members were said to have been physically fused to bulkheads, while others suffered from mental disorders, and still others supposedly simply vanished. It is also claimed that the ship's crew may have been subjected to brainwashing, in order to maintain the secrecy of the experiment.

Origins of the story

Morris Jessup and Carlos Miguel Allende

In 1955, Morris K. Jessup, an amateur astronomer and former graduate-level researcher, published The Case for the UFO, a book about unidentified flying objects that contains some theorizing about the different means of propulsion that flying-saucer-style UFOs might use. Jessup speculated that antigravity or the manipulation of electromagnetism may be responsible for the observed flight behavior of UFOs. He lamented, both in the book and during the publicity tour that followed, that space flight research was concentrated in the area of rocketry, and that little attention had been paid to other theoretical means of flight, which he felt might ultimately be more fruitful. Jessup emphasized that a breakthrough revision of Albert Einstein's "Unified Field Theory" would be critical in powering a future generation of spacecraft.

On January 13, 1955, Jessup received a letter from a man who identified himself as one "Carlos Allende". In the letter, Allende informed Jessup of the "Philadelphia Experiment", alluding to two poorly sourced contemporary newspaper articles as proof. Allende directly responded to Jessup's call for research on the "Unified Field Theory", which he referred to as "UFT". According to Allende, Einstein had solved the theory, but had suppressed it, since mankind was not ready for it—a confession that the scientist allegedly shared with the mathematician and philosopher Bertrand Russell. Allende also said that he had witnessed the Eldridge disappear and reappear while serving aboard the SS Andrew Furuseth, a nearby merchant ship. Allende further named other crew members with whom he served aboard the Andrew Furuseth, and claimed to know the fate of some of the crew members of the Eldridge after the experiment, including one whom he witnessed disappearing during a chaotic fight in a bar. Although Allende claimed to have observed the experiment while on the Andrew Furuseth, he provided no substantiation of his other claims linking the experiment with the Unified Field Theory, no evidence of Einstein's alleged resolution of the theory, and no proof of Einstein's alleged private confession to Russell.

Jessup replied to Allende by a postcard, asking for further evidence and corroboration. The reply to that came months later. However, this time the correspondent identified himself as "Carl M. Allen". Allen said that he could not provide the details for which Jessup was asking, but he implied that he might be able to recall some by means of hypnosis. Suspecting that Allende/Allen was a fraud, Jessup discontinued the correspondence.

It has been claimed that Jessup's use of a postcard in responding to Allende publicized their correspondence. This possibility, some theorists consider, was plausible cause for the Government to intervene, disrupting the conversation by replacing Allende with Allen, who was possibly a CIA agent monitoring Allende's inbound mail. Allende was accessible to the community of "Philadelphia Experiment" researchers for years, discounting any alleged intervention by the Government.

The Office of Naval Research and the Varo annotation

In early 1957, Jessup was contacted by the Office of Naval Research (ONR) in Washington, D.C., and was asked to study the contents of a parcel that it had received.[6] Upon his arrival, Mr. Jessup was astonished to find that a paperback copy of his UFO book had been mailed to the ONR in a manila envelope marked "Happy Easter." Furthermore, the book had been extensively annotated by hand in its margins, and an ONR officer asked Jessup if he had any idea as to who had done so.

The lengthy annotations were written with three different colors of ink which were pink, and they appeared to detail a correspondence among three individuals, only one of which is given a name: "Jemi". The ONR labelled the other two "Mr A." and "Mr B." The annotators refer to each other as "Gypsies," and discuss two different types of "people" living in outer space. Their text contained non-standard use of capitalization and punctuation, and detailed a lengthy discussion of the merits of various suppositions that Jessup makes throughout his book, with oblique references to the Philadelphia Experiment, in a way that suggested prior or superior knowledge (for example, "Mr B." reassures his fellow annotators, who have highlighted a certain theory of Jessup’s).

Based on the handwriting style and subject matter, Jessup identified "Mr A." as Allende / Allen. Others have suggested that the three annotations are actually from the same person, using three pens.[citation needed]

The annotated book sparked such interest that the ONR funded a small printing of the volume by the Texas-based Varo Manufacturing Company.[7] A 2003 transcription of the annotated "Varo edition" is available online, complete with three-color notes.[8]

Later, the ONR contacted Jessup, claiming that the return address on Allende's letter to Jessup was an abandoned farmhouse. They also informed Jessup that the Varo Corporation, a research firm, was preparing a print copy of the annotated version of The Case for the UFO, complete with both letters he had received. About a hundred copies of the Varo Edition were printed and distributed within the Navy. Jessup was also sent three for his own use.

Jessup attempted to make a living writing on the topic, but his follow-up book did not sell well, and his publisher rejected several other manuscripts. In 1958, his wife left him, and his friends described him as being depressed and somewhat unstable when he travelled to New York. After returning to Florida, he was involved in a serious car accident and was slow to recover, apparently increasing his despondency. He was found dead on April 20, 1959, and the death was ruled a suicide.[citation needed]

Public dissemination

Resurfacing via literature

In 1963, Vincent Gaddis published Invisible Horizons: True Mysteries of the Sea, in which the story of the experiment from the Varo annotation is recounted. Later, In 1978, the writers George E. Simpson and Neal R. Burger released a novel called Thin Air. While leaning heavily on known lore of the "Philadelphia Experiment", Thin Air is simply a thriller with no pretension of telling a true story. In the tale set in the present day, a Naval Investigative Service officer investigates several threads linking wartime invisibility experiments to a conspiracy involving teleportation technology. In 1979, Charles Berlitz and his co-author, William L. Moore, published The Philadelphia Experiment: Project Invisibility. More recently Simon R. Green included the myth in his book The Spy Who Haunted Me. Paul Violette's book Secrets of Anti-Gravity Propulsion recounts some mysterious involvement of the physicist Thomas Townsend Brown of the Philadelphia Navy yard.

Hollywood interpretation and the Bielek testimony

In 1984, the story was adapted into a motion picture, The Philadelphia Experiment, directed by Stewart Raffill. Though based only loosely on the prior accounts of the "Experiment", it served to bring the core elements of the original story into mainstream scrutiny.

In 1990, Alfred Bielek, a self-proclaimed former crew-member of the USS Eldridge and an alleged witness of the "Experiment", supported the version as it was portrayed in the movie, adding embellishments which were disseminated via the Internet, eventually percolating into various mainstream outlets. In 2003, Bielek's version of his participation in the "Philadelphia Experiment" was debunked by a small team of investigators, including the American Marshall Barnes, the Canadian Fred Houpt, and the German Gerold Schelm. Their consensus was that Bielek was nowhere near the ship at the proposed time of the experiment.[9]

There is also a reference to the "Philadelphia Experiment" in the horror/action movie Outpost in which the Nazi Germans were supposedly conducting similar tests on soldiers.

Evidence

Research into the supposed "Experiment" has revealed many contradictions and inconsistencies. In addition, no scientific support for the described phenomena or the purported events has surfaced.

Evidence and research

Many observers argue that it is inappropriate to grant much credence to an unusual story promoted by one individual, in the absence of more conclusive corroborating evidence. An article written by Robert Goerman for Fate magazine in 1980, determined that "Carlos Allende" / "Carl Allen" was in fact Carl Meredith Allen of New Kensington, Pennsylvania, who had an established history of psychiatric illness, and who may have fabricated the primary history of the experiment as a result of his mental illness. Some sources indicate that Allen was a known prankster, and that the "Philadelphia Experiment" story may have been an elaborate hoax.

The historian Mike Dash[2] notes that many authors who publicized the "Philadelphia Experiment" story after Jessup seemed to have conducted little or no research of their own: through the late 1970s, for example, Allende / Allen was often described as mysterious and difficult to locate. But after only a few telephone calls, Goerman was able to determine Allende / Allen's true identity. Others speculate that much of the key literature emphasizes dramatic embellishment rather than pertinent research. Though Berlitz and Moore's famous account of the story (The Philadelphia Experiment: Project Invisibility) contained much supposedly factual information, such as transcripts of an interview with a scientist involved in the experiment, their work has also been criticised for plagiarising key story elements from the fictitious novel Thin Air which was published a year earlier.

Scientific aspects

No fully developed Unified Field Theory currently exists, although it is still a subject of ongoing research. William Moore's book on the "Philadelphia Experiment" claims that Albert Einstein completed, and subsequently destroyed, a theory before his death. Moore bases this on Carl Allen's letter to Jessup in which Allen refers to a conversation between Einstein and Bertrand Russell acknowledging that the theory had been solved, but that man was not ready for it.[10]

Also, shortly before his death in 1943, Nikola Tesla supposedly claimed to have completed some kind of a "Unified Field Theory". It was never published.[11]

While very limited "invisibility cloaks" have recently been developed using metamaterial,[12] these are unrelated to theories linking electromagnetism with gravity.

Timeline inconsistencies

The USS Eldridge was not commissioned until August 27, 1943, and it remained in port in New York City until September 1943. The October experiment allegedly took place while the ship was on its first shakedown cruise in the Bahamas, although proponents of the story claim that the ship's logs might have been falsified, or else still be classified.

The Office of Naval Research (ONR) stated in September 1996 that "ONR has never conducted investigations on radar invisibility, either in 1943 or at any other time". Pointing out that the ONR was not established until 1946, it denounces the accounts of the Philadelphia Experiment as complete "science fiction".

A reunion of navy veterans who had served aboard the USS Eldridge told a Philadelphia newspaper in April 1999 that their ship had never made port in Philadelphia.[13] Further evidence discounting the Philadelphia Experiment timeline comes from the USS Eldridge’s complete World War II action report, including the remarks section of the 1943 deck log, available on microfilm.[4]

Alternative explanations

Researcher Jacques Vallée[14][15] describes a procedure on board the USS Engstrom (DE-50), which was docked alongside the Eldridge in 1943. The operation involved the generation of a powerful electromagnetic field on board the ship in order to degauss it, with the goal of rendering the ship undetectable or "invisible" to magnetically-fused undersea mines and torpedoes. This system was invented by a Canadian, and the Royal Navy and other navies used it widely during the Second World War. British ships of the era often included such degaussing systems built into the upper decks (the conduits are still visible on the deck of HMS Belfast (C35) in London, for example). Degaussing is still used today. However, it has absolutely no effect on visible light or radar. Vallée speculates that accounts of the USS Engstrom’s degaussing might have been garbled and confabulated in subsequent retellings, and that these accounts may have influenced the story of the so-called "Philadelphia Experiment".

According to Vallée, a Navy veteran who served on board the USS Engstrom noted that the Eldridge might indeed have travelled from Philadelphia to Norfolk and back again in a single day at a time when merchant ships could not: by use of the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal and the Chesapeake Bay, which at the time was open only to naval vessels.[14] Use of that channel was kept quiet: German submarines had ravaged shipping along the East Coast during Operation Drumbeat, and thus military ships unable to protect themselves were secretly moved via canals to avoid the threat.[16] It should be noted that this same veteran claims to be the man that Allende witnessed “disappearing” at a bar. He claims that when the fight broke out, friendly barmaids whisked him out the back door of the bar before the police arrived, because he was under age for drinking. They then covered for him by claiming that he had disappeared.[16]

In 2004, additional details of the Philadelphia Experiment story were put forth in the story Einstein's Antigravity. This story documents a number of new claims by defense-scientist John Dering that are believed by many to make the Philadelphia Experiment story more plausible. First, Dering asserts to have worked with William Moore (original co-author of "The Philadelphia Experiment: Project Invisibility), and to know from this relationship with Moore that the pseudonym "Reinhart" was in fact the real surname for the scientist interviewed about Einstein's Unified Field Theory in the book. Dering further asserts that a Dr. Reinhart was assigned to the Philadephia Naval Yard in 1943 as a naval degaussing specialist, and indicates that Albert Einstein's FBI file also places that scientist in the Philadelphia Naval Yard during the same period as "working on a device to explode a torpedo under a ship".

Dering offers significant further research, including speculation that Al Bielek learned the technical details of the project from a booklet published by Dr. James Corum at a 1994 Colorado Springs Tesla Symposium in 1994 entitled, "Tesla's Egg of Columbus, Radar Stealth, the Torsion Tensor, and the 'Philadelphia Experiment'".

Cultural references

The Philadelphia experiment was the subject of a 1984 Sci-Fi movie of the same name. Numerous versions of the experiment have been featured in films, books and video games.

The computer game Command & Conquer: Red Alert references this in a video regarding the Allied Chronosphere, in which footage is shown of a ship disappearing then reappearing seconds later. One of the commanders remarks that all the men on board died and the process is still experimental.

The experiment has been the subject of several television shows dealing with the paranormal and with conspiracy theories, including The Unexplained, History's Mysteries , Vanishings! and Unsolved Mysteries.

It has been used in film and literature to explain time travel and non-linear plots, such as in William S. Burroughs novel Cities of the Red Night or the movie 100 Million BC.

References to the experiment can be found in many other works, including The X-Files, Sanctuary season 1 episode 7, The Triangle, the Doctor Who audio drama The Macros, the collaborative novel "Green Fire" and the novels The Spy who Haunted Me and Ship of the Damned.

In 2010 neo-progressive band Frost* released a live album entitled The Philadelphia Experiment, recorded at their first US appearance at Rosfest 2009.

The experiment is mentioned in the Assassin's Creed video game, in which it is said that a group of templars are responsible for the experiment.

American Power Metal group Cage has a song called 'The Philadelphia Experiment' on their album 'Darker than Black'

In the video game Half Life 2: Episode 2 a story of a ship called the Borealis was mentioned. In the game, the ship supposedly vanished with a piece of the Dry dock to some unknown location. This bears many similarities to the original Philadelphia Experiment story.

See also

Notes

  1. ^ Carroll, Robert Todd (2007-12-03). "Philadelphia experiment". The Skeptic's Dictionary. Retrieved 2008-02-05.
  2. ^ a b c Dash, Mike (2000) [1997]. Borderlands. Woodstock, New York: Overlook Press. ISBN 9780879517243. OCLC 41932447.
  3. ^ Adams, Cecil (1987-10-23). "Did the U.S. Navy teleport ships in the Philadelphia Experiment?". The Straight Dope. Retrieved 2007-02-20.
  4. ^ a b "The "Philadelphia Experiment"". Naval Historical Center of the United States Navy. 2000-11-28. Retrieved 2007-02-20.
  5. ^ History Channel : That's Impossible!
  6. ^ Moseley, James W. & Karl T. Pflock (2002), Shockingly Close to the Truth!: Confessions of a Grave-Robbing Ufologist, Prometheus Books, ISBN 1-57392-991-3
  7. ^ Introduction to the Varo edition of M. K. Jessup's Case for the UFO
  8. ^ Jessup, M. K. (2003) [1973]. "Varo Edition" THE CASE FOR THE UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECT (pdf). The Cassiopaean Experiment. {{cite book}}: External link in |publisher= (help)
  9. ^ "Al Bielek Debunked". 2008-01-14.
  10. ^ The Philadelphia Experiment: Project Invisibility, William L. Moore, Grosset and Dunlap, New York, New York, 1979, pages 18-19.
  11. ^ "Prepared Statement by Nikola Tesla" (.doc file). Pepe's Tesla Pages. 1889. {{cite web}}: External link in |publisher= (help)
  12. ^ See, for example here and here.
  13. ^ Lewis, Frank (August 19–26, 1999). "The Where Ship? Project: Though long dismissed by the Navy, the legend of The Philadelphia Experiment shows no signs of disappearing". Philadelphia City Paper. Retrieved 2008-02-05.
  14. ^ a b abstract of "Anatomy of a Hoax: The Philadelphia Experiment Fifty Years Later" by Jacques F. Vallée, URL accessed February 21, 2007
  15. ^ excerpts of "Anatomy Of A Hoax: The Philadelphia Experiment 50 Years Later" URL accessed February 21, 2007
  16. ^ a b abstract of "Anatomy of a Hoax: The Philadelphia Experiment Fifty Years Later" by Jacques F. Vallee, URL accessed February 21, 2007

References

Farrell, Joseph P. (2008). Secrets of the Unified Field: The Philadelphia Experiment, The Nazi Bell, and the Discarded Theory. Adventures Unlimited Press. ISBN 1931882843.