Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Canada/Assessment: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
added WikiProject Canada banner
Line 10: Line 10:
I just came across this article today, and I seriously do not think that a B-class rating is appropriate. The article contains a much-too-large lead paragraph, a historical timeline which confuses the uninitiated like me, a few nice pictures, and an inappropriately large amount of detail on horse deaths, and that's about it. No detail about the events or the grounds or parade or recent winners or anything, and most of all no specifics of chuckwagon racing - to my mind the single most significant event of the Stampede.
I just came across this article today, and I seriously do not think that a B-class rating is appropriate. The article contains a much-too-large lead paragraph, a historical timeline which confuses the uninitiated like me, a few nice pictures, and an inappropriately large amount of detail on horse deaths, and that's about it. No detail about the events or the grounds or parade or recent winners or anything, and most of all no specifics of chuckwagon racing - to my mind the single most significant event of the Stampede.
I propose downgrading the article to C-class. [[User:Fleebo|Fleebo]] ([[User talk:Fleebo|talk]]) 05:52, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
I propose downgrading the article to C-class. [[User:Fleebo|Fleebo]] ([[User talk:Fleebo|talk]]) 05:52, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

== Vancouver and Montreal ==

Why are Vancouver and Montreal listed as being able to be converted? There is opposition at Montreal to such a conversion, and Vancouver doesn't seem to have been contacted about any such process. [[Special:Contributions/65.93.12.108|65.93.12.108]] ([[User talk:65.93.12.108|talk]]) 06:16, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:16, 3 December 2010

WikiProject iconCanada Project‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
ProjectThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

After looking through this article, I think it deserves either a B- or A-class rating, as it is fairly well written, is properly referenced and research, and is of a High importance. What do you think? -YK Times 17:18, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Saskatchewan Wikiproject self assessment query

The members on this wikiproject for Saskatchewan are using the Canadian banner for assessment purposes. There has been a discussion whether a Saskatchewan banner complete with assessment should be started or not. I see some provinces self assess on their talk page banners and some do not. SriMesh | talk 02:07, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just came across this article today, and I seriously do not think that a B-class rating is appropriate. The article contains a much-too-large lead paragraph, a historical timeline which confuses the uninitiated like me, a few nice pictures, and an inappropriately large amount of detail on horse deaths, and that's about it. No detail about the events or the grounds or parade or recent winners or anything, and most of all no specifics of chuckwagon racing - to my mind the single most significant event of the Stampede. I propose downgrading the article to C-class. Fleebo (talk) 05:52, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vancouver and Montreal

Why are Vancouver and Montreal listed as being able to be converted? There is opposition at Montreal to such a conversion, and Vancouver doesn't seem to have been contacted about any such process. 65.93.12.108 (talk) 06:16, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]