Talk:List of countries by prevalence of opiates use: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
→Getting to the Point...: new section |
No edit summary |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
== Getting to the Point... == |
== Getting to the Point... == |
||
...Am I being cynical, or is it "strange" that (England&Wales) and (Scotland) should be listed as separate entities in the list of "cannabis use by country" (where Scotland has, apparently, a far lower usage than England&Wales), and yet they are all lumped together as " |
...Am I being cynical, or is it "strange" that (England&Wales) and (Scotland) should be listed as separate entities in the list of "cannabis use by country" (where Scotland has, apparently, a far lower usage than England&Wales), and yet they are all lumped together as the "United Kingdom" in the list of "opiate use by country"? |
||
"Draw" your own conclusions... |
"Draw" your own conclusions... |
||
Revision as of 01:50, 4 December 2010
Crime and Criminal Biography List‑class | |||||||
|
New Discussion
A discussion has been started at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Countries/Lists of countries which could affect the inclusion criteria and title of this and other lists of countries. Editors are invited to participate. Pfainuk talk 12:25, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
Getting to the Point...
...Am I being cynical, or is it "strange" that (England&Wales) and (Scotland) should be listed as separate entities in the list of "cannabis use by country" (where Scotland has, apparently, a far lower usage than England&Wales), and yet they are all lumped together as the "United Kingdom" in the list of "opiate use by country"? "Draw" your own conclusions...