Jump to content

Talk:Twentieth Amendment to the United States Constitution: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Archived an old thread
Line 17: Line 17:


If [[Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources|reliable sourcing]] is added, that material can be restored to the article. Before such restoration, I recommend wording improvements. [[User:SMP0328.|SMP0328.]] ([[User talk:SMP0328.|talk]]) 18:30, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
If [[Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources|reliable sourcing]] is added, that material can be restored to the article. Before such restoration, I recommend wording improvements. [[User:SMP0328.|SMP0328.]] ([[User talk:SMP0328.|talk]]) 18:30, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

== Why not change election day? ==

Congress set the date for elections as the Constitution allows it to; it could have shortened the time between elections and taking office by setting an election date in February; by the 30s travel wasn't nearly as difficult in winter as it had been before 1900. Changing election day requires no amendment to the Constitution. [[Special:Contributions/4.233.194.21|4.233.194.21]] ([[User talk:4.233.194.21|talk]]) 01:22, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:22, 22 December 2010

WikiProject iconU.S. Congress Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
This article has not yet been assigned a subject.
The options are: "Person", "People", "Place", "Thing", or "Events".

Removed synthesis

I have removed the following from the History section:

Notably in each historical case above, there had been a concurrent, decisive, change in the political composition of both the incoming Congress and the executive administration, brought about by a robust national debate in the just prior election. From the standpoint of democratic political theory therefore, the national election, and its outcome, had worked as intended in carrying out the process of the democratic formulation of public policy alternatives, as embodied by the people's selection of a specified group of individuals who embodied those public policy choices.

That material is unsourced and appears to simply be a conclusion reached from material earlier mentioned in that section. This violates the ban on original research, specifically for being unsourced synthesis.

If reliable sourcing is added, that material can be restored to the article. Before such restoration, I recommend wording improvements. SMP0328. (talk) 18:30, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why not change election day?

Congress set the date for elections as the Constitution allows it to; it could have shortened the time between elections and taking office by setting an election date in February; by the 30s travel wasn't nearly as difficult in winter as it had been before 1900. Changing election day requires no amendment to the Constitution. 4.233.194.21 (talk) 01:22, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]