Jump to content

User talk:JL-Bot: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Feature request: new section
clarifying where the feature request applies and adding a second idea
Line 17: Line 17:
:::There didn't seem to be a large enough demand for it given the effort required to implement. I have some free time coming up that I might be able to get it in. I'll have to see how things go. -- [[User:JLaTondre|JLaTondre]] ([[User talk:JLaTondre#top|talk]]) 19:54, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
:::There didn't seem to be a large enough demand for it given the effort required to implement. I have some free time coming up that I might be able to get it in. I'll have to see how things go. -- [[User:JLaTondre|JLaTondre]] ([[User talk:JLaTondre#top|talk]]) 19:54, 17 December 2010 (UTC)


== Feature request ==
== Feature request for Project Content ==


One minor improvement that would be great is if the date that an article was featured on the main page could be included in the "Main page featured articles" list (which shows up when you use the ''content-mainpage-featured'' parameter). I assume that the bot is already crawling the TFA archives to generate this list, so hopefully it's easy to add. Thanks for considering this new feature! --[[User:Skotywa|SkotyWA]]<sup>''[[User_talk:Skotywa|T]]''</sup><sub style="margin-left:-1.0ex;">''[[Special:Contributions/Skotywa|C]]''</sub> 20:31, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
One minor improvement that would be great is if the date that an article was featured on the main page could be included in the "Main page featured articles" list (which shows up when you use the ''content-mainpage-featured'' parameter). I assume that the bot is already crawling the TFA archives to generate this list, so hopefully it's easy to add. Thanks for considering this new feature! --[[User:Skotywa|SkotyWA]]<sup>''[[User_talk:Skotywa|T]]''</sup><sub style="margin-left:-1.0ex;">''[[Special:Contributions/Skotywa|C]]''</sub> 20:31, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

== Another feature request for Project Content ==
One other improvement I'd like to suggest is to add support for peer reviews. Articles appearing in [[Category:Requests for peer review]] would be listed. --[[User:Skotywa|SkotyWA]]<sup>''[[User_talk:Skotywa|T]]''</sup><sub style="margin-left:-1.0ex;">''[[Special:Contributions/Skotywa|C]]''</sub> 22:33, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:33, 24 December 2010

Sorting order

What does the bot use to determine the sorting order for items on Recognized Content lists? Stuff at WP:USRD/RC is all out of order, and I'm afraid that if I manually fix the page anymore, the bot will undo it on the next pass. Imzadi 1979  22:56, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It uses the articles' {{DEFAULTSORT:sortkey}} sort keys. -- JLaTondre (talk) 02:31, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
A somewhat related question... I remember asking a while back (and I see in the archives of this page) about an option to sort by date listed for things like DYK, main page appearance, etc. Not to sound like a heckler, but what ever happened to that?--Dudemanfellabra (talk) 02:49, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
There didn't seem to be a large enough demand for it given the effort required to implement. I have some free time coming up that I might be able to get it in. I'll have to see how things go. -- JLaTondre (talk) 19:54, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Feature request for Project Content

One minor improvement that would be great is if the date that an article was featured on the main page could be included in the "Main page featured articles" list (which shows up when you use the content-mainpage-featured parameter). I assume that the bot is already crawling the TFA archives to generate this list, so hopefully it's easy to add. Thanks for considering this new feature! --SkotyWATC 20:31, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Another feature request for Project Content

One other improvement I'd like to suggest is to add support for peer reviews. Articles appearing in would be listed. --SkotyWATC 22:33, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]