Donald Wayne Foster: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
:''This page is about the American professor, who uses "Donald W. Foster" in his academic writing and "Don Foster" in his popular writing. See [[Don Foster]] for the UK politician.'' |
:''This page is about the American professor, who uses "Donald W. Foster" in his academic writing and "Don Foster" in his popular writing. See [[Don Foster]] for the UK politician.'' |
||
'''Donald W. Foster''', born [[1950]], is a professor of English at [[Vassar College]] in [[New York]]. He achieved instant academic notoriety with his [[1985]] doctoral thesis, which tentatively identified [[William Shakespeare|Shakespeare]] as the author "W. S." of an obscure [[1612]] poem, ''A Funerall Elegye in memory of the late Vertuous Maister William Peeter'', the first new Shakespeare identification in over a century. The scholarly community widely rejected the claim, but as the controversy subsided, the idea gained small amounts of acceptance, most notably with some publishers who included the poem in their ''Complete Shakespeare'' editions. In 1995, Foster went further by announcing that "A ''Funerall Elegye'' belongs hereafter with Shakespeare's poems and plays". [http://web.archive.org/web/20010802184633/www.linguafranca.com/9807/crain.html] In [[2002]], Gilles Monsarrat and Brian Vickers came to the conclusion that [[John Ford (dramatist)|John Ford]] was more likely to be the correct author, and Foster accepted this new attribution. |
'''Donald W. Foster''', born [[1950]], is a professor of English at [[Vassar College]] in [[New York]]. He achieved instant academic notoriety with his [[1985]] doctoral thesis, which tentatively identified [[William Shakespeare|Shakespeare]] as the author "W. S." of an obscure [[1612]] poem, ''A Funerall Elegye in memory of the late Vertuous Maister William Peeter'', the first new Shakespeare identification in over a century. The scholarly community widely rejected the claim, but as the controversy subsided, the idea gained small amounts of acceptance, most notably with some publishers who included the poem in their ''Complete Shakespeare'' editions. In 1995, Foster went further by announcing that "A ''Funerall Elegye'' belongs hereafter with Shakespeare's poems and plays". [http://web.archive.org/web/20010802184633/www.linguafranca.com/9807/crain.html] |
||
In [[2002]], Gilles Monsarrat and Brian Vickers came to the conclusion that [[John Ford (dramatist)|John Ford]] was more likely to be the correct author, and Foster accepted this new attribution. |
|||
Foster said, ""I know good evidence when I see it and I predict that Monsarrat will carry the day." "No one who cannot rejoice in the discovery of his own mistakes deserves to be called a scholar." |
|||
In the mid-[[1990s|nineties]], the academic controversy began to attract popular attention, leading to numerous requests for Foster to apply his "literary detective" skills to various anonymous and pseudonymous texts. Using a mixture of traditional scholarship and computers to perform textual comparisons, Foster looks for unique and unusual usage patterns. At his best, he is perhaps the closest literary scholarship gets to proving something "by algebra". |
In the mid-[[1990s|nineties]], the academic controversy began to attract popular attention, leading to numerous requests for Foster to apply his "literary detective" skills to various anonymous and pseudonymous texts. Using a mixture of traditional scholarship and computers to perform textual comparisons, Foster looks for unique and unusual usage patterns. At his best, he is perhaps the closest literary scholarship gets to proving something "by algebra". |
||
Line 10: | Line 14: | ||
* outing Joe Klein as the author of ''[[Primary Colors]]'': Klein denied it for six months, then finally came clean |
* outing Joe Klein as the author of ''[[Primary Colors]]'': Klein denied it for six months, then finally came clean |
||
Foster accomplished this with the use of the MacIntosh program "Reveal It!". He put in the writing samples of several "suspects" and a section of the book. The program determined that the most likely author was Klein. One "clue" was the use of the word "tarmac-jumping". |
|||
* confirming David Kaczynski's testimony that the [[Unabomber]] manifesto was written by his brother, Ted |
* confirming David Kaczynski's testimony that the [[Unabomber]] manifesto was written by his brother, Ted |
||
Foster was called in AFTER TK was arrested. His "work" involved comparing the manifesto to tons of documents found in TK's cabin. |
|||
* identifying an obscure [[Beat Generation|Beat]] writer, Tom Hawkins, as the author of the [[Wanda Tinasky]] letters, commonly assumed to be the work of [[Thomas Pynchon]] |
* identifying an obscure [[Beat Generation|Beat]] writer, Tom Hawkins, as the author of the [[Wanda Tinasky]] letters, commonly assumed to be the work of [[Thomas Pynchon]] |
||
Still being discussed |
|||
* confirming a Livingston family tradition that it was their ancestor, [[Henry Livingston Jr.]], and not [[Clement Clarke Moore]], who wrote ''[[A Visit from St. Nicholas]]'' |
* confirming a Livingston family tradition that it was their ancestor, [[Henry Livingston Jr.]], and not [[Clement Clarke Moore]], who wrote ''[[A Visit from St. Nicholas]]'' |
||
Still being discussed |
|||
Foster has garnered controversy for his techniques. In particular, his involvement in the [[JonBenét Ramsey]] murder case aroused criticism when it emerged that the scholar had offered his services to both sides, |
Foster has garnered controversy for his techniques. In particular, his involvement in the [[JonBenét Ramsey]] murder case aroused criticism when it emerged that the scholar had offered his services to both sides. Initially, he lobbied for Patsy Ramsey's innocence while indicating to authorities that an Internet poster, jameson, was the killer. Later, when it became clear jameson was NOT the killer but a NC housewife, he was hired by the police and accused Patsy Ramsey of writing the ransom note. |
||
Foster has taken an interest in the [[2001 anthrax attacks]]. Initially he argued that the perpetrator was likely a foreigner, but later wrote an article for ''[[Vanity Fair magazine|Vanity Fair]]'' naming [[Steven Hatfill]] as a prime suspect (Hatfill had already been labeled a "[[person of interest]]" by [[United States Attorney General|Attorney General]] [[John Ashcroft]]). Hatfill is suing Foster for [[defamation]]. [http://msnbc.msn.com/id/6152515] |
Foster has taken an interest in the [[2001 anthrax attacks]]. Initially he argued that the perpetrator was likely a foreigner, but later wrote an article for ''[[Vanity Fair magazine|Vanity Fair]]'' naming [[Steven Hatfill]] as a prime suspect (Hatfill had already been labeled a "[[person of interest]]" by [[United States Attorney General|Attorney General]] [[John Ashcroft]]). Hatfill is suing Foster for [[defamation]]. [http://msnbc.msn.com/id/6152515] |
||
Line 22: | Line 33: | ||
==References== |
==References== |
||
*[http://web.archive.org/web/20011101111232/www.linguafranca.com/9807/crain.html ''Lingua Franca'' article: The Bard's Fingerprints] |
*[http://web.archive.org/web/20011101111232/www.linguafranca.com/9807/crain.html ''Lingua Franca'' article: The Bard's Fingerprints] |
||
http://www.jameson245.com/foster_page.htm |
|||
[[Category:American professors|Foster, Donald]] |
[[Category:American professors|Foster, Donald]] |
Revision as of 00:40, 23 February 2006
- This page is about the American professor, who uses "Donald W. Foster" in his academic writing and "Don Foster" in his popular writing. See Don Foster for the UK politician.
Donald W. Foster, born 1950, is a professor of English at Vassar College in New York. He achieved instant academic notoriety with his 1985 doctoral thesis, which tentatively identified Shakespeare as the author "W. S." of an obscure 1612 poem, A Funerall Elegye in memory of the late Vertuous Maister William Peeter, the first new Shakespeare identification in over a century. The scholarly community widely rejected the claim, but as the controversy subsided, the idea gained small amounts of acceptance, most notably with some publishers who included the poem in their Complete Shakespeare editions. In 1995, Foster went further by announcing that "A Funerall Elegye belongs hereafter with Shakespeare's poems and plays". [1]
In 2002, Gilles Monsarrat and Brian Vickers came to the conclusion that John Ford was more likely to be the correct author, and Foster accepted this new attribution.
Foster said, ""I know good evidence when I see it and I predict that Monsarrat will carry the day." "No one who cannot rejoice in the discovery of his own mistakes deserves to be called a scholar."
In the mid-nineties, the academic controversy began to attract popular attention, leading to numerous requests for Foster to apply his "literary detective" skills to various anonymous and pseudonymous texts. Using a mixture of traditional scholarship and computers to perform textual comparisons, Foster looks for unique and unusual usage patterns. At his best, he is perhaps the closest literary scholarship gets to proving something "by algebra".
It should be noted that computer based statistical techniques for textual analysis had been used by historians long before Foster developed his own, most notably with the Federalist Papers, with very little controversy.
High points in Foster's detection include:
- outing Joe Klein as the author of Primary Colors: Klein denied it for six months, then finally came clean
Foster accomplished this with the use of the MacIntosh program "Reveal It!". He put in the writing samples of several "suspects" and a section of the book. The program determined that the most likely author was Klein. One "clue" was the use of the word "tarmac-jumping".
- confirming David Kaczynski's testimony that the Unabomber manifesto was written by his brother, Ted
Foster was called in AFTER TK was arrested. His "work" involved comparing the manifesto to tons of documents found in TK's cabin.
- identifying an obscure Beat writer, Tom Hawkins, as the author of the Wanda Tinasky letters, commonly assumed to be the work of Thomas Pynchon
Still being discussed
- confirming a Livingston family tradition that it was their ancestor, Henry Livingston Jr., and not Clement Clarke Moore, who wrote A Visit from St. Nicholas
Still being discussed
Foster has garnered controversy for his techniques. In particular, his involvement in the JonBenét Ramsey murder case aroused criticism when it emerged that the scholar had offered his services to both sides. Initially, he lobbied for Patsy Ramsey's innocence while indicating to authorities that an Internet poster, jameson, was the killer. Later, when it became clear jameson was NOT the killer but a NC housewife, he was hired by the police and accused Patsy Ramsey of writing the ransom note.
Foster has taken an interest in the 2001 anthrax attacks. Initially he argued that the perpetrator was likely a foreigner, but later wrote an article for Vanity Fair naming Steven Hatfill as a prime suspect (Hatfill had already been labeled a "person of interest" by Attorney General John Ashcroft). Hatfill is suing Foster for defamation. [2]
Foster is the author of two books: Elegy by W.S.: A Study in Attribution (1989) ISBN 0874133351 and Author Unknown: On the Trail of Anonymous (2000) ISBN 0805063579.