Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scorio: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 14:10, 19 January 2011

Scorio

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I've looked through all the references (the German wiki has the same links) and did not find a single one that passes our guidelines for reliable sources--they're all blogs, online portals, communities, etc. Barring other evidence, I have to say that this article does not pass WP:GNG, nor do I see how it passes WP:WEB. Article had been deleted but was restored; a wider discussion is in order. Drmies (talk) 18:22, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I tend to agree with you, but it's a really interesting implementation, so I hate to !vote delete.... --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 18:32, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Weeeeell Sarek, that looks like a pretty clear-cut case of WP:ILIKEIT. I'm going to throw in some WP:COI, WP:AdminAbuse, and WP:POV, all per WP:CONSPIRACY [I didn't know that existed--I'll read it after I'm done ranting], and ask you to hand over your mop. Maybe you can go find references to save it, if you like it so much! :) Drmies (talk) 18:38, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry Sarek, but there seems to be nothing at all. Drmies (talk) 18:52, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've noticed that in the past, yes, which is why I didn't !vote to keep. :-) --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 19:29, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It is not clear to me, why the review of scorio at delamar (http://www.delamar.de/pressemitteilung/scorio-kostenloser-musiknoteneditor-musiknoten-8843/) does not pass WP:WEB. It is independent of scorio.com and written by a delamar editor in a rather critical way. delamar is not just another blog, but a respectable news site about the music business. Scorgle (talk) 14:10, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I'm glad this has been brought to my notice, because my old copy of Finale is acting up, but unfortunately it does not appear to be notable. Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 21:44, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Just a side note on this. As can be seen at the (currently) bottom section on my talk page, I originally A7 CSDed this. The author protested, and created enough smoke that I was no longer certain that it qualified for A7 CSD. Enough hints of possible notability to make me second guess myself. And if I'm second guessing myself, then it likely should not be A7 deleted any more. So I restored it, with the intention of, when I had more time, doing a more thorough check of the references in order to decide whether or not to bring it to AFD. I did not get around to that check, but here it is anyway. - TexasAndroid (talk) 22:31, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry if I beat you to it. I did see the discussion on your talk page--just to make things clear, I have no problem with it having been reinstated. An AfD discussion may bring in more editors who might help establish notability, and that's fine with me, though I don't see it happening yet. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 01:17, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 22:32, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 22:32, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 22:32, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 :::I'm sorry Sarek, but there seems to be [http://www.google.com/search?q=scorio&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a nothing at all]. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 18:52, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
 ::::I've noticed that in the past, yes, which is why I didn't !vote to keep. :-) --[[User:SarekOfVulcan|SarekOfVulcan]] ([[User talk:SarekOfVulcan|talk]]) 19:29, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
+:'''Comment''' It is not clear to me, why the review of scorio at delamar (http://www.delamar.de/pressemitteilung/scorio-kostenloser-musiknoteneditor-musiknoten-8843/) does not pass [[WP:WEB]]. It is independent of scorio.com and written by a delamar editor in a rather critical way. delamar is not just another blog, but a respectable news site about the music business. [[User:Scorgle|Scorgle]] ([[User talk:Scorgle|talk]]) 14:10, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
 *'''Delete'''. I'm glad this has been brought to my notice, because my old copy of Finale is acting up, but unfortunately it does not appear to be notable. [[User:Roscelese|Roscelese]] ([[User talk:Roscelese|talk]] &sdot; [[Special:Contributions/Roscelese|contribs]]) 21:44, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
 *'''Comment''' - Just a side note on this.  As can be seen at the (currently) bottom section on my talk page, I originally A7 CSDed this.  The author protested, and created enough smoke that I was no longer certain that it qualified for A7 CSD.  Enough hints of possible notability to make me second guess myself.  And if I'm second guessing myself, then it likely should not be A7 deleted any more.  So I restored it, with the intention of, when I had more time, doing a more thorough check of the references in order to decide whether or not to bring it to AFD.  I did not get around to that check, but here it is anyway. - [[User:TexasAndroid|TexasAndroid]] ([[User talk:TexasAndroid|talk]]) 22:31, 18 January 2011 (UTC)