Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emsworth Cricket Club: Difference between revisions
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
:'''Delete''' - Its a village cricket club - the local newspaper cuttings that decorate the article do not show the sort of substantial, coverage that is required to meet notability guidelines.[[User:Nigel Ish|Nigel Ish]] ([[User talk:Nigel Ish|talk]]) 19:33, 29 January 2011 (UTC) |
:'''Delete''' - Its a village cricket club - the local newspaper cuttings that decorate the article do not show the sort of substantial, coverage that is required to meet notability guidelines.[[User:Nigel Ish|Nigel Ish]] ([[User talk:Nigel Ish|talk]]) 19:33, 29 January 2011 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' Amateur sports club which got some routine local coverage over the centuries. Does not satisfy [[WP:ORG]]. [[User:Edison|Edison]] ([[User talk:Edison|talk]]) 21:20, 29 January 2011 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' Amateur sports club which got some routine local coverage over the centuries. Does not satisfy [[WP:ORG]]. [[User:Edison|Edison]] ([[User talk:Edison|talk]]) 21:20, 29 January 2011 (UTC) |
||
Why should a local cricket club have it's own page on this website? Obviously a valid club and been established for a while. Nothing offensive or false on the page. All need to do is put in Emsworth Cricket Club into a search engine and information comes up. Why just because it is a small team and not major does it not deserve it's own page on here? It's like saying some individual people even though done something small cannot as not a major celebrity. |
|||
Revision as of 08:10, 30 January 2011
- Emsworth Cricket Club (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Cold harbour lawn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Two articles covering an amateur cricket club and its grounds. Apparently very old, but I can't really find any reliable in depth coverage independent from the club's own website showing notability. Travelbird (talk) 12:22, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:43, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
Valid reason as it took a long time to find any information regards to this amatuer cricket club, allthough with some indepth research at libraries and online libraries, I have been able to find many forms of reliable indepth coverage that you seek. If you follow this link to the British Newspaper Library you will find the valid source of information http://newspapers.bl.uk/blcs/ Leegray21 (talk) 15:10, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - Its a village cricket club - the local newspaper cuttings that decorate the article do not show the sort of substantial, coverage that is required to meet notability guidelines.Nigel Ish (talk) 19:33, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Amateur sports club which got some routine local coverage over the centuries. Does not satisfy WP:ORG. Edison (talk) 21:20, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
Why should a local cricket club have it's own page on this website? Obviously a valid club and been established for a while. Nothing offensive or false on the page. All need to do is put in Emsworth Cricket Club into a search engine and information comes up. Why just because it is a small team and not major does it not deserve it's own page on here? It's like saying some individual people even though done something small cannot as not a major celebrity.