User talk:Ryulong: Difference between revisions

	My local time: September 2024 3 Tuesday 2:59 pm EST
Archives
	2—6/06; 7/06; 8/06; 9/06; 10/06; 11/06; 12/06; 1/07; 2/07; 3/07; 4/07; 5/07; 6/07; 7/07; 8/07; 9/07; 10/07; 11/07; 12/07; 1/08; 2/08; 3/08; 4/08; 5/08; 6/08; 7/08; 8/08; 9/08; 10/08; 11/08; 12/08; 1/09; 2/09; 3/09; 4/09; 5/09; 6/09; 7/09; 8/09; 9/09; 10/09; 11/09; 12/09; 1/10; 2/10; 3/10; 4/10; 5/10; 6/10; 7/10; 8/10; 9/10; 10/10; 11/10; 12/10; 1/11; 2/11; 3/11; 4/11; 5/11; 6/11; 7/11; 8/11; 9/11; 10/11; 11/11; 12/11; 1/12; 2/12; 3/12; 4/12; 5/12; 6/12; 7/12; 8/12; 9/12; 10/12; 11/12; 12/12; 1/13; 2/13; 3/13; 4/13; 5/13; 6/13; 7/13; 8/13; 9/13; 10/13; 11/13; 12/13; 1/14; 2/14; 3/14; 4/14; 5/14; 6/14; 7/14; 8/14; 9/14; 10/14; 11/14; 12/14; 1/15;

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 13:10, 21 February 2011

Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page by using either the "new section" tab or this link.

Please sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). If you do not sign your comments, I may remove them entirely.

Please keep your comments short and to the point. I do not want to read essays on this page.

I will revert and ignore any basic template messages used on my talk page. If you want to talk to me, use your own words.

I prefer to keep conversations on one page. If I left a message for you on your user talk page, I prefer to respond to you there.

When I find that the conversations or issues discussed here have either ended or resolved, they will be inserted into my archives at my own discretion.—Ryūlóng

Zoroark: Master of Illusions Plot

Hello, I'm new to wikipedia. I recently (couple hours ago) finished watching the movie on Cartoon Network On-Demand. Should I post the plot or just wait until the airing occurs?174.29.90.139 (talk) 20:27, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You can go right ahead. Just don't make it very long.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 20:28, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

I just posted the plot (ignore my comments i was nervous and overjoyed). I was wondering if you could proof read/fix it174.29.90.139 (talk) 20:52, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How does one add a recent air template like those on recently dead telling readers that the article will constanly be edited.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.29.90.139 (talk • contribs)

You don't have to.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 00:59, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Sentai 199

You said not to make the character's page, but what about the Super Sentai 35th anniversary film? ~Marvelous2011~ ( ★ AlienX2009 ★ ) 02:06, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No. We only have one independent source on it.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 02:22, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

New revealed Pokemon

[1] [2] Could you take care of this? Thanks, _Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 03:51, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just say that advertisements are not reliable sources. Official Nintendo Magazine UK is questionable though.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 03:54, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Well, they are on IGN as well. Does that count any more? _Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 17:16, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If they're just screencaps in an article, don't use them.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 17:38, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

I hate Facebook Idiots

I got an offending message from the Pretty Cure Club in Faceboob HERE in my Wikipedia Talk PAGE! Their message:

Please stop deleting the Suite Precure Rumor character page. It's the real official rumored Pretty Cure characters from the official Anime 2010 magazine. The proof of source is located here:

Reference source

http://www.facebook.com/search.php?q=cure+beat&init=quick&tas=0.12518590717357503&type=groups#!/photo.php?fbid=198573373489664&set=o.170419669664221

If you continue to misbehave and continue to delete the rumored section, we, the Pretty Cure Fans leader, will complain your misknown deletion to the wiki admin. Because you don't know the rumored characters, we Precure Fans will give you a chance to change your deletion behaviour.

From the Pretty Cure Fans

What are they thinking?? Are they adding thing that are just rumors in the Suite PreCure because they're leaked and considered official?? JEEZ! Don't make me pull out a shotgun...do something about this! What rule are these people breaking?? DO SOMETHING!!!!!--Blackgaia02 (talk) 11:27, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I will request that the page be protected.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 17:37, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Best Wishes

Do you know how to fix the " PokCharacter not recognized by string_indexmon</f " part at the top right of the page? I'm talking about on the pokemon best wishes page. SimpsonsMan1234 7:31pm February 9th, 2011 (UTC)

I don't see it.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 17:45, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

I see it. I don't know why, but the season name parameter does not like the "é" symbol. _Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 17:52, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's a new one.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 17:55, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

I've fixed it. Someone edited the template and it broke it.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 17:58, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

I've been unable to reproduce the problem described above, but I know for sure that the (hidden) link and font tags are not helping. Would it be acceptable to remove the link, use fgcolor, and give it another try? —LOL ^T/_C 19:44, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If it wasn't broken for the longest time, why fix it in the first place?—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 19:49, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Because for the longest time, it incorrectly italicized text within parentheses. —LOL ^T/_C 21:46, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that seems to affect all of the Pokémon episode lists because they are formatted differently.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 21:48, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

I discovered the issue. However, will your edit deal with the "List of X episodes" formatting?—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 21:56, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

What do you mean by "List of X episodes" formatting? My changes only involved the {{{season_name}}} parameter. I'm hoping to create a temporary category to track down articles that pass in > or [ characters. —LOL ^T/_C 22:03, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I believe the issue with the template was how it was using a piped link rather than the font tags, as it was affecting all of the Pokémon episode lists.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 22:21, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Piped links are fine, as you can see here, but if the link target contains a left parenthesis then the code I added would fail. I don't believe links should be passed into {{{season_name}}} anyway because a link to the series page should be in the lead. How about we give this another try and see if the 'é' causes any problems? —LOL ^T/_C 23:28, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I've removed all the piped links. And <br> tags putting the names on two lines. Go ahead.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 23:38, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Just fyi, it turns out that font tags are fine, but we should still be using fgcolor. I previously thought that they would contribute to the problem because equal signs are special characters, but MediaWiki has some tolerance. The only problem was having a piped link whose that contained a parenthesis. I had the infobox on my watchlist, but thank you for messaging me about the problem instead of simply undoing the edit. —LOL ^T/_C 01:00, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar!

		The Pokémon Barnstar
		For your efforts in keeping articles like List of Pokémon: Black & White episodes, List of Pokémon (494–545), (546–598) and (599–649) current and without un-sourced info in a hectic time where people are constantly trying to go against guidelines. _Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 04:24, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Most Recent Edit; Reliable source?

I have already made some minor edits, but as a fan of Pokémon, I am now questioning whether to add the link in the subsection of the article, Pokémon (anime), in relavance to the start date that I have confirmed on the official U.S. website.[3] I have not added this link because I fear that the URL that I was going to provide may not be a reliable source. CHAK 001 21:02, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

The episode came out, so its broadcast is enough of a reliable source.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 21:12, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for clarifying. CHAK 001 21:15, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

So thats all we were to you?

We were nothing but placeholders for your own personal gain? You never cared about our feelings? Why are you so cruel? All we ask for is a little respect after thanking you for your services. What can be wrong with that? I don't know why you keep reporting us, we are doing nothing wrong. If we are doing something wrong please explain instead of banning us quickly. We colons have feelings too, and we demand to be treated with respect. WildForceColon (talk) 13:10, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 72: / Line 72: @@
 :The episode came out, so its broadcast is enough of a reliable source.—<font color="blue">Ryūlóng</font> (<font color="Gold">竜龙</font>) 21:12, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
 :Thanks for clarifying. CHAK 001 21:15, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
+== So thats all we were to you? ==
+We were nothing but placeholders for your own personal gain?  You never cared about our feelings?  Why are you so cruel?  All we ask for is a little respect after thanking you for your services.  What can be wrong with that?  I don't know why you keep reporting us, we are doing nothing wrong.  If we are doing something wrong please explain instead of banning us quickly.  We colons have feelings too, and we demand to be treated with respect. [[User:WildForceColon|WildForceColon]] ([[User talk:WildForceColon|talk]]) 13:10, 21 February 2011 (UTC)