Hungarian Turanism: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary Tag: references removed |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
The Hungarian Turan Society was founded in 1910 and included many leading scholars of the day. Initially, it concentrated on geography rather than race but more radical Turanists soon identified "Turan" with the whole of Asia and even proclaimed kinship between the Hungarians and the [[Japanese people|Japanese]], [[Koreans]] and [[Chinese people|Chinese]]. The movement received impetus after Hungary's defeat in [[World War I]]. Outrage at the [[Treaty of Trianon]], which saw Hungary lose two-thirds of its historical territory, led many to reject Europe and turn towards the East in search of new allies in a bid to revise the terms of the treaty and restore Hungarian power. The more radical Turanists stressed the superiority of Eastern culture to that of the West and emphasized the racial aspects of the ideology.<ref>Stephen Uhalley ''China and Christianity: Burdened Past, Hopeful Future'', M.E. Sharpe, 2001, p.218 ff.</ref> In [[Transylvania]], "Turanist ethnographers and folklorists privileged the peasants' cultural 'uniqueness', locating a cultural essence of [[Hungarian people|Magyar]]ness in everything from fishing hooks and methods of animal husbandry to ritual folk songs, archaic, 'individualistic' dances, spicy dishes and superstitions".<ref>László Kürti ''The Remote Borderland: Transylvania in the Hungarian Imagination'', SUNY Press, 2001, p.97</ref> |
The Hungarian Turan Society was founded in 1910 and included many leading scholars of the day. Initially, it concentrated on geography rather than race but more radical Turanists soon identified "Turan" with the whole of Asia and even proclaimed kinship between the Hungarians and the [[Japanese people|Japanese]], [[Koreans]] and [[Chinese people|Chinese]]. The movement received impetus after Hungary's defeat in [[World War I]]. Outrage at the [[Treaty of Trianon]], which saw Hungary lose two-thirds of its historical territory, led many to reject Europe and turn towards the East in search of new allies in a bid to revise the terms of the treaty and restore Hungarian power. The more radical Turanists stressed the superiority of Eastern culture to that of the West and emphasized the racial aspects of the ideology.<ref>Stephen Uhalley ''China and Christianity: Burdened Past, Hopeful Future'', M.E. Sharpe, 2001, p.218 ff.</ref> In [[Transylvania]], "Turanist ethnographers and folklorists privileged the peasants' cultural 'uniqueness', locating a cultural essence of [[Hungarian people|Magyar]]ness in everything from fishing hooks and methods of animal husbandry to ritual folk songs, archaic, 'individualistic' dances, spicy dishes and superstitions".<ref>László Kürti ''The Remote Borderland: Transylvania in the Hungarian Imagination'', SUNY Press, 2001, p.97</ref> |
||
==Turanism |
==Turanism== |
||
The leader of the Hungarian |
The leader of the Hungarian [[Arrow Cross Party]], [[Ferenc Szálasi]], believed in the existence of a "Turanian-Hungarian" race (which included [[Jesus Christ]]). The idea was a key part of his ideology of "Hungarism". |
||
In Hungary some |
In Hungary some people tried to link the ancestors of the Hungarians to [[Timur]], the [[Ottomans]] and Japan, which some Hungarians of the 1930s described as the 'other sword of Turan' (the first sword being Hungary). {{cquote|While some Hungarian Turanists went as far as to argue they were racially healthier than and superior to other Europeans (including Germans, who were already corrupted by [[Judaism]]), others felt more modestly, that as Turanians living in Europe, they might provide an important bridge between East and West and thus play a role in world politics out of proportion of their numbers or the size of their country. This geopolitical argument was taken to absurd extremes by Ferenc Szálasi, head of the Arrow Cross-Hungarist movement, who believed that, owing to their unique historical and geographical position, Hungarians might play a role equal to, or even more important than, Germany in building the new European order, while Szálasi's own charisma might eventually help him supersede [[Adolf Hitler|Hitler]] as leader of the international movement.<ref> Andrew C. Janos ''East Central Europe in the Modern World'' Stanford University Press, 2002 pp.185-186</ref>}} |
||
==References== |
==References== |
Revision as of 14:25, 26 February 2011
Hungarian Turanism (Hungarian: Turanizmus) is a Hungarian nationalist ideology which stresses the alleged origins of the Hungarian people in the steppes of Central Asia ("Turan") and the affinity of the Hungarians with Asian peoples such as the Turks. It gained wide currency on the Hungarian political right in the years between the two world wars.
Origins
The Hungarian Turan Society was founded in 1910 and included many leading scholars of the day. Initially, it concentrated on geography rather than race but more radical Turanists soon identified "Turan" with the whole of Asia and even proclaimed kinship between the Hungarians and the Japanese, Koreans and Chinese. The movement received impetus after Hungary's defeat in World War I. Outrage at the Treaty of Trianon, which saw Hungary lose two-thirds of its historical territory, led many to reject Europe and turn towards the East in search of new allies in a bid to revise the terms of the treaty and restore Hungarian power. The more radical Turanists stressed the superiority of Eastern culture to that of the West and emphasized the racial aspects of the ideology.[1] In Transylvania, "Turanist ethnographers and folklorists privileged the peasants' cultural 'uniqueness', locating a cultural essence of Magyarness in everything from fishing hooks and methods of animal husbandry to ritual folk songs, archaic, 'individualistic' dances, spicy dishes and superstitions".[2]
Turanism
The leader of the Hungarian Arrow Cross Party, Ferenc Szálasi, believed in the existence of a "Turanian-Hungarian" race (which included Jesus Christ). The idea was a key part of his ideology of "Hungarism".
In Hungary some people tried to link the ancestors of the Hungarians to Timur, the Ottomans and Japan, which some Hungarians of the 1930s described as the 'other sword of Turan' (the first sword being Hungary).
While some Hungarian Turanists went as far as to argue they were racially healthier than and superior to other Europeans (including Germans, who were already corrupted by Judaism), others felt more modestly, that as Turanians living in Europe, they might provide an important bridge between East and West and thus play a role in world politics out of proportion of their numbers or the size of their country. This geopolitical argument was taken to absurd extremes by Ferenc Szálasi, head of the Arrow Cross-Hungarist movement, who believed that, owing to their unique historical and geographical position, Hungarians might play a role equal to, or even more important than, Germany in building the new European order, while Szálasi's own charisma might eventually help him supersede Hitler as leader of the international movement.[3]
References
- ^ Stephen Uhalley China and Christianity: Burdened Past, Hopeful Future, M.E. Sharpe, 2001, p.218 ff.
- ^ László Kürti The Remote Borderland: Transylvania in the Hungarian Imagination, SUNY Press, 2001, p.97
- ^ Andrew C. Janos East Central Europe in the Modern World Stanford University Press, 2002 pp.185-186
See also
- Curse of Turan
- Turanism (similar Turkic ideology)
Further reading
- Joseph Kessler Turanism and Pan-Turanism in Hungary: 1890-1945 (University of California, Berkeley, PhD thesis, 1967)