I can no longer contribute to Wikipedia like I used to...this is a good thing: life in the real world is keeping me very busy, with important new research to perform. As such, I may not be very responsive to messages here. --
Scientizzle
...for the help with 1intheknow or whatever his name was. He is still making edits to talk page, mucking things up - including the fix you implemented. Also if you have a chance - consider restricting User:24.188.102.80 as it appears to be from the same user. Thanks again Srobak (talk) 20:40, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- 24.188.102.80 (talk · contribs) is covered by the autoblock now... — Scientizzle 20:43, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Nice to see you around! Cheers, Valfontis (talk) 05:24, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Likewise! — Scientizzle 15:06, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, in this case, since there's also legitimate edits being made by Melih Yavuz, I'm not qualified to say the IP is related to Melih Yavuz. If you think the evidence is strong, and if the IP vandalism continues, you should bring it up at WP:SPI. --Golbez (talk) 16:05, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for the reply. I think the evidence for the IP being Melih Yavuz (talk · contribs) (perhaps accidental logouts, not necessarily anything on purpose) is pretty good: the same type of edits occurred over a very close period of time at Eskişehir, Fethiye, and also at Sinop, Turkey (where the gap in time is considerably larger). There are indeed many legitimate edits though. I'll leave a message at User talk:Melih Yavuz that explains the problems and suggests a way forward... Thanks, — Scientizzle 16:16, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Scientizzle,
Hi, I reverted your redirect İnlice, Muğla → İnlice. Because thety are different places some 350 kilometres (220 mi) apart. Cheeers Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 09:37, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- That seems like a pretty good reason for reverting. :) Thanks, — Scientizzle 14:51, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
crossed edits on you - and I'm not sure what I lost when it happened. sorry about that - let me know what I mucked so I can fix it.--Ludwigs2 19:08, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I think I fixed it...it was only ref formatting that got lost. Cheers, — Scientizzle 19:20, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I am User:LutherVinci's little sis and he is helping me get started on Wikipedia.
No worries. No, um...sock puppeting:) ;) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.50.57.15 (talk) 19:41, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Okay then, Kel. You and your brother should take a look at Wikipedia:User pages and perhaps consider toning down some of the content on your user pages.
- Also, your entire "Unscientific People" section is grossly misinformed. Please read our article on the straw man (a logical fallacy you're blatantly committing) and peruse the various articles on evolution around here--articles I've contributed to. Introduction to evolution would be a great place to start if you're not well-versed in the topic. — Scientizzle 19:51, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This is LutherVinci, I am speaking on my sister's behalf. Please try to go easy on this 11-year-old Wikipedian, at least while she's getting used to the place. So long as she's not using these kind of arguments on the rest of Wikipedia, all her opinions will be contained within her user page. After all, I would expect that on her own user page she is entitled to her own opinion, right? (plus, she can be a little crazy at times, so please go easy on her). Besides, all of her statements do have merit, she just tends to exaggerates when she's allowed to speak freely. Again, I hope she can speak freely on her own user page, so long as she does not use like arguments any where else. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kelthecool (talk • contribs) 01:45, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm not planning to do anything. However, as a scientist and educator, I cannot in good conscience allow ignorance to go unchallenged. It's quite ridiculous to write in one line "I will try to be tolerant" and in the next line write "Hello all you idiotic atheists out there...Here is a list of stupid things atheists have said:" followed by a somewhat-incomprehensible list of uninformed or misinformed assertions applied to a swath of people. It's hypocritical and it reflects poorly. One is entitled to one's own opinions, of course, but opinions founded in hypocrisy and ignorance are not worth defending, in my opinion.
- If you actually think "all of her statements do have merit", you too could benefit from some further education. I'd be happy to offer some explanations regarding evolutionary theory or some of the philosophical positions that atheists I'm familiar with actually hold. I suggested some Wikipedia articles worth reading because you two are participating within a compendium of freely-available knowledge through which you can challenge your preconceived ideas. — Scientizzle 17:05, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Why are you deleting this article? Just take a look to other refences: FOUR (energy drinks) etc.. My article has nothing to do with advertising! Its an information about an, for my understanding, imortand product concept! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Analustia1 (talk • contribs) 19:09, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Hi Analustia1, I have restored the deleted content. I was too hasty in my deletion and apologize. Cheers, — Scientizzle 19:11, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- firend, I appreciate your support! Its realy a great beverage concept to be mentioned! lets give them people a to find out about Post mix concepts! Have a great day!
