Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case: Difference between revisions
{{subst:arbreq}} |
add Dreadstar case |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
== |
== Dreadstar == |
||
'''Initiated by ''' <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<font style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">''' Sandstein '''</font>]]</span></small> '''at''' 05:57, 9 March 2011 (UTC) |
'''Initiated by ''' <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<font style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">''' Sandstein '''</font>]]</span></small> '''at''' 05:57, 9 March 2011 (UTC) |
||
=== Involved parties === |
=== Involved parties === |
||
<!-- use {{admin|username}} if the party is an administrator --> |
<!-- use {{admin|username}} if the party is an administrator --> |
||
*{{ |
*{{admin|Sandstein}}, ''filing party'' |
||
*{{ |
*{{admin|Dreadstar}} |
||
*{{ |
*{{user|Ludwigs2}} |
||
*{{userlinks|username4}} |
|||
<!-- The editor filing the case should be included as a party for purposes of notifications. --> |
|||
;Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request |
;Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request |
||
<!-- All parties must be notified that the request has been filed, immediately after it is posted, and confirmation posted here. --> |
|||
*Diff. 1 |
|||
*Diff. 2 |
*Diff. 2 |
||
;Confirmation that other steps in [[Wikipedia:dispute resolution|dispute resolution]] have been tried |
;Confirmation that other steps in [[Wikipedia:dispute resolution|dispute resolution]] have been tried |
||
<!-- Identify prior attempts at dispute resolution here, with links/diffs to the page where the resolution took place. If prior dispute resolution has not been attempted, the reasons for this should be explained in the request for arbitration --> |
<!-- Identify prior attempts at dispute resolution here, with links/diffs to the page where the resolution took place. If prior dispute resolution has not been attempted, the reasons for this should be explained in the request for arbitration --> |
||
*None; this concerns an unauthorized reversal of an arbitration enforcement action. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<font style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">''' Sandstein '''</font>]]</span></small> 06:38, 9 March 2011 (UTC) |
|||
*Link 1 |
|||
*Link 2 |
|||
=== Statement by |
=== Statement by Sandstein === |
||
At 23:27, 8 March 2011, I blocked Ludwigs2 for 72 hours as a response to threats they made at [[WP:AN]] against another editor in the context of a dispute concerning the [[pseudoscience]] article ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=WP:AN&oldid=417866404#QuackGuru_again_-_what_do_I_do_now.3F State of the AN thread at that time]). I labeled this block as an arbitration enforcement action pursuant to [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Pseudoscience#Discretionary sanctions]], and applied the {{tl|uw-aeblock}} to Ludwigs2's talk page, which warns administrators not to unilaterally undo it except as per [[WP:AEBLOCK]] ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ludwigs2&oldid=417904219#Your_recent_AN_thread Current state of the respective section of Ludwigs2's talk page]). |
|||
Following my announcement of the block, it was criticized by five editors at [[WP:AN]] ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&oldid=417890208#QuackGuru_again_-_what_do_I_do_now.3F Slimvirgin, Hans Adler, Short Brigade Harvester Boris, The Four Deuces, Xxanthippe]), of which several, as it appears to me from their statements, had been involved in disputes related to the editor threatened by Ludwigs2 and/or the topic of pseudoscience. Two editors, on the other hand, appeared to agree that Ludwigs2's statement at issue had been disruptive ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=417882930 Collect], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=417883619 N419BH]). |
|||
At 02:41, 9 March 2011, about three hours after the block, Dreadstar [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ludwigs2&diff=prev&oldid=417892068 unblocked] Ludwigs2 without entering into discussion with me. Later, on his talk page, in response to a query from another user, Dreadstar [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dreadstar&diff=prev&oldid=417896394 declined] to undo his reversal of my arbitration enforcement action. |
|||
I submit that the discussion at [[WP:AN]] did not constitute [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&oldid=417890208#QuackGuru_again_-_what_do_I_do_now.3F at the time of the unblock], or indeed [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&oldid=417914824#QuackGuru_again_-_what_do_I_do_now.3F now], the "clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors" that is required, per [[WP:AEBLOCK|this Committee's prior decision]], to undo my AE action. I therefore respectfully ask the Committee to take the steps it considers appropriate to prevent Dreadstar from continuing from unilaterally reverting AE actions. At the same time, I welcome any advice or criticism by the Committee about whether my AE action was appropriate or what other action, if any, would have been better. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<font style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">''' Sandstein '''</font>]]</span></small> 06:38, 9 March 2011 (UTC) |
|||
=== Statement by {Party 2} === |
=== Statement by {Party 2} === |
||
Revision as of 06:38, 9 March 2011
- recent changes
- purge this page
- view or discuss this template
| Request name | Motions | Initiated | Votes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dreadstar | 9 March 2011 | {{{votes}}} |
| Request name | Motions | Case | Posted |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amendment request: Conduct in deletion-related editing | Motion | (orig. case) | 30 April 2024 |
| Amendment request: Article titles and capitalisation | none | (orig. case) | 13 May 2024 |
| Clarification request: Extended confirmed restriction | none | none | 29 May 2024 |
No arbitrator motions are currently open.
Requests for arbitration
Use this page to request the committee open an arbitration case. To be accepted, an arbitration request needs 4 net votes to "accept" (or a majority). Arbitration is a last resort. WP:DR lists the other, escalating processes that should be used before arbitration. The committee will decline premature requests. Requests may be referred to as "case requests" or "RFARs"; once opened, they become "cases". Before requesting arbitration, read the arbitration guide. Then click the button below. Complete the instructions quickly; requests incomplete for over an hour may be removed. Consider preparing the request in your userspace. To request enforcement of an existing arbitration ruling, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. To clarify or change an existing arbitration ruling, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment. This page is for statements, not discussion.
|
Dreadstar
Initiated by Sandstein at 05:57, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Involved parties
- Sandstein (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA), filing party
- Dreadstar (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)
- Ludwigs2 (talk · contribs)
- Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request
- Diff. 2
- Confirmation that other steps in dispute resolution have been tried
- None; this concerns an unauthorized reversal of an arbitration enforcement action. Sandstein 06:38, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Statement by Sandstein
At 23:27, 8 March 2011, I blocked Ludwigs2 for 72 hours as a response to threats they made at WP:AN against another editor in the context of a dispute concerning the pseudoscience article (State of the AN thread at that time). I labeled this block as an arbitration enforcement action pursuant to Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Pseudoscience#Discretionary sanctions, and applied the {{uw-aeblock}} to Ludwigs2's talk page, which warns administrators not to unilaterally undo it except as per WP:AEBLOCK (Current state of the respective section of Ludwigs2's talk page).
Following my announcement of the block, it was criticized by five editors at WP:AN (Slimvirgin, Hans Adler, Short Brigade Harvester Boris, The Four Deuces, Xxanthippe), of which several, as it appears to me from their statements, had been involved in disputes related to the editor threatened by Ludwigs2 and/or the topic of pseudoscience. Two editors, on the other hand, appeared to agree that Ludwigs2's statement at issue had been disruptive (Collect, N419BH).
At 02:41, 9 March 2011, about three hours after the block, Dreadstar unblocked Ludwigs2 without entering into discussion with me. Later, on his talk page, in response to a query from another user, Dreadstar declined to undo his reversal of my arbitration enforcement action.
I submit that the discussion at WP:AN did not constitute at the time of the unblock, or indeed now, the "clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors" that is required, per this Committee's prior decision, to undo my AE action. I therefore respectfully ask the Committee to take the steps it considers appropriate to prevent Dreadstar from continuing from unilaterally reverting AE actions. At the same time, I welcome any advice or criticism by the Committee about whether my AE action was appropriate or what other action, if any, would have been better. Sandstein 06:38, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Statement by {Party 2}
Statement by {Party 3}
Clerk notes
- This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).