User talk:Seb az86556

earlier on this program... (archives) (+)

2009 15255    july 2009 49597    august 2009 12718    september 2009 6884    october 2009 20650    november 2009 27742    december 2009 2010 38848    january 2010 31594    february 2010 18754    march 2010 14511    april 2010 18480    may 2010 9998    june 2010 13864    july 2010 17597    august 2010 6479    september 2010 12322    october 2010 22341    november 2010 6914    december 2010 2011 27363    january 2011 15692    february 2011 16618    march 2011 12744    april 2011 9267    may 2011 5866    june 2011 13911    july 2011 4768    august 2011 4600    september 2011 5340    october 2011 13038    november 2011 15661    december 2011 2012 5527    january 2012 6684    february 2012 6179    march 2012 7290    april 2012 8723    may 2012 10438    june 2012 5929    july 2012 7638    august 2012 14328    september 2012 16008    october 2012 9891    november 2012 1822    december 2012 2013 12285    january 2013 8185    february 2013 18650    march 2013 6264    april 2013

Buffy Sainte-Marie

Read the Native American article. The term is inclusive covering all of North and South America, while First Nations is exclusive, covering only Canada. Therefore she is both. Yworo (talk) 14:15, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

In addition, she is Cree, a nation which spans and is independent of both US and Canada. Yworo (talk) 14:19, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

I don't really get this distinction either, but the people who argue about this from the Canadian side insist on "First Nations." This is apparently how the categories are set up. But ah well, I won't quibble about this. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 16:46, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

I'm sure they are probably perfectly right for tribes contained completely in one country or the other. :-) Yworo (talk) 18:16, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for catching my mistake. I was trying to NPOV the recent addition to article, but I have no attachment to my version. If you think it needs further modification, do please make any changes you think are best. Many thanks, --TeaDrinker (talk) 05:51, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

173 etc

I have advised him to keep his questions confined to the ref desk. His questions don't seem to belong on that article talk page. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 02:45, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

I know; somebody needs to stop him eventually. Either incompetent or a troll. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 02:46, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

He claims to be 12. Could be. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 02:50, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

well, that explains it... Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 02:51, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Obviously the same guy as "Jaboc"-whatever, and I expect it to be blocked soon. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 03:20, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

He gawn, bye-bye. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 03:49, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Darn. Good things always happen when I'm out to get some coffee. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 04:07, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Well, you made the connection. I just facilitated the mop-up work. :) ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 04:36, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Linda Pascotto

Hi, I see you nominated this article for deletion. I agree the subject is not notable, but would not the prod blp tag, found here [[1]] be more appropriate to a living biography? I see it allows 10 days for sources to be found. Rumiton (talk) 05:03, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

That one is only for BLPs without any refs or evidence; besides, if you manage to find sources, you can add them at any time, the AfD doesn't prevent you from doing that. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 05:06, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Yes, but this article appears to currently have no sources at all, and the normal AfD tag only allows 7 days until deletion. Anyway, no problem. Rumiton (talk) 05:57, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Nabahat Khan (disambiguation)

It's 1:40 here in the East, so I'm perhaps sleepy enough that I'm simply misunderstanding you, but...your message confuses me. Where do "me," "my father", "my uncle," and "my brother" come in? I can't find them anywhere in any past revision. Nyttend (talk) 06:42, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for section rescue

Thanks for reverting Josh simo (talk · contribs) after he removed an entire discussion from my talk page (diff). – Athaenara ✉ 07:23, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for leaving a reason

On the Stormtrooper (Star Wars) edit, I was getting a little P*ssed off because User:TheRealFennShysa was not leaving any reason of why my edits were or were not appropriate they were just reverted without explanation, I thought he/she/they were trolling to an edit war, In fact I was just about report them in the Edit War noticeboard. I thought it was a notable cultural reference but apparently not. Thanks again. 71.101.84.191 (talk) 14:49, 17 March 2011 (UTC)