Jump to content

User talk:65.112.21.194: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 31: Line 31:
I'll get back to you on your proposed wording
I'll get back to you on your proposed wording
[[User:WhisperToMe|WhisperToMe]] ([[User talk:WhisperToMe|talk]]) 19:30, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
[[User:WhisperToMe|WhisperToMe]] ([[User talk:WhisperToMe|talk]]) 19:30, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

Appreciate your feedback. Thank you.
[[Special:Contributions/65.112.21.194|65.112.21.194]] ([[User talk:65.112.21.194#top|talk]]) 19:38, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:38, 27 March 2011

Template:IPsock

April 2010

My mistake. I thought you removed the other user's comment. I didn't see that it got pushed down. --Mosmof (talk) 20:32, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 13:22, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 14:55, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're being discussed

Please see User talk:EdJohnston#Rabbi Pinto. You may respond there if you wish. EdJohnston (talk) 16:47, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

December 2010

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Yoshiyahu Yosef Pinto, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Yworo (talk) 13:52, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011

Regarding Shmuley Boteach — the article is now extraordinarily well-referenced and comports with the BLP section of the MOS in its construction. I did some work on it months ago, and was shocked when one day I found that User:Shalominthehome had done major surgery on it. In particular, (s)he put everything into the intro and had inexplicably deleted a vast amount of content, including all that I had contributed. Thank you for asking for my feedback. All the best--Hokeman (talk) 15:44, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Would you mind posting this message on the talk page incase shalominthehome or someone else tries to interfere with it ? Would appreciate having this posted so we know noone can once again try to do what they did to you earlier... and keep an eye on it ? but most important post this to the Boteach talk page so people know the edits are collaboriative.65.112.21.194 (talk) 14:58, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for abusing multiple accounts; see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Babasalichai. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. EyeSerenetalk 12:52, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Usually the best way to get new eyes in a particular dispute is to use WP:RFC

I'll get back to you on your proposed wording WhisperToMe (talk) 19:30, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciate your feedback. Thank you. 65.112.21.194 (talk) 19:38, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]