Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Irvine22: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Undid revision 425398005 by LemonMonday (talk) comments on GD are not relevant to this SPI |
LemonMonday (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small> |
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small> |
||
:Irvine has threatened administrator HelloAnnyong, if a range-block is put in place. [[User:GoodDay|GoodDay]] ([[User talk:GoodDay|talk]]) 16:08, 22 April 2011 (UTC) |
:Irvine has threatened administrator HelloAnnyong, if a range-block is put in place. [[User:GoodDay|GoodDay]] ([[User talk:GoodDay|talk]]) 16:08, 22 April 2011 (UTC) |
||
::GoodDay, what an SPI enthusiast you are! I guess if the whole stupid concept of SPIs is ever abandoned you'd be at loss for something to do. [[User:LemonMonday|<font color="DarkBlue">'''LemonMonday'''</font>]] [[User talk:LemonMonday|<font color="Orange">''' Talk '''</font>]] 20:44, 22 April 2011 (UTC) |
|||
======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== |
======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== |
||
Revision as of 20:53, 22 April 2011
Irvine22
- Irvine22 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Irvine22/Archive.
– An SPI clerk has endorsed a request for CheckUser. A checkuser will shortly review the case.
22 April 2011
- Suspected sockpuppets
- StaunerOStauner (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Ingolfur Staunersson (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- 12.193.76.178 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"
Another new sock. Nearly identical name, same issues. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 12:00, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
- Irvine has threatened administrator HelloAnnyong, if a range-block is put in place. GoodDay (talk) 16:08, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
- GoodDay, what an SPI enthusiast you are! I guess if the whole stupid concept of SPIs is ever abandoned you'd be at loss for something to do. LemonMonday Talk 20:44, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Clerk endorsed - I've blocked the account and protected the article in question, but I'm endorsing to see if we can get an IP/rangeblock here. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 12:01, 22 April 2011 (UTC)