User talk:Ninatukawewe

PhD reliable source?

I see emphasis on reliable sources. Is a PhD thesis a reliable source? _Ninatukawewe (talk) 19:19, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

See WP:Reliable sources, which includes in the section headed "Scholarship":

Finished Ph.D. dissertations, which are publicly available, are considered publications by scholars and are routinely cited in footnotes. They have been vetted by the scholarly community; most are available via interlibrary loan. UMI has published two million dissertations since 1940. Dissertations in progress are not vetted and are not regarded as published. They are not reliable sources as a rule.

Regards, JohnCD (talk) 19:31, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

(ec)The answer doesn't appear to be clear-cut. Check out this discussion, which I perused - I think it is saying Master thesis no, Phd, maybe, depends. --SPhilbrickT 19:32, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

Assuming you are talking about a specific thesis, you could post a question about it at WP:RSN and get specific feedback on a particular thesis.--SPhilbrickT 19:35, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

...and , by the way, Welcome!

Hello, Ninatukawewe, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! JohnCD (talk) 19:36, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

ok. Thanks for your replies. I've read WP policy and the other links supplied. From what I see, those who have PhDs support WP policy as it stands while those who have not bothered to get a PhD suppose themselves competent judges to counter WP policy. Since a PhD is only granted to someone by others who have PhDs and that the PhD thesis (or dissertation) is the basis for granting the PhD, then It seems to me that those who suppose themselves qualified to challenge WP policy and yet do not have a PhD don't have a leg to stand on. I also noticed several unsupported assertions, which makes it even more doubtful of their ability to judge competently that this or that PhD thesis is reliable or not reliable. It seems to me that WP policy is the only valid way. Ninatukawewe (talk) 16:11, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Trabucogold for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. bW 21:19, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

Just remember. What goes around comes around. Watch your back. It will catch up with you. You will be forgotten and not regretted. Ninatukawewe (talk) 03:40, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

And I never had a chance to defend myself. I logged off one day and I log in the next and I'm blocked. I was accused and blocked before I even had a chance to say anything. All it takes is a suspicion and some circumstantial evidence and kablam you are blocked. I am not whoever people think I am. I can't help it if I happen to have similar interests with other editors. Did anybody bother to check IPs? Ninatukawewe (talk) 16:30, 12 May 2011 (UTC)