Jump to content

British National (Overseas): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Criticism: corrected the word "LESS" to "FEWER"
Line 57: Line 57:


==Criticism==
==Criticism==
*The creation of a new nationality (with less privileges) has been met with criticism, as many Hong Kong residents felt the British citizenship would have been more appropriate in light of the "moral debt" owed to them by the UK.<ref>For example, the legislative councilor [[Henrietta Ip Man-Hing|Dr Henrietta Ip]] criticized the idea of British National (Overseas) and again urged the UK Parliament, to grant full British citizenship to Hong Kong's British nationals in the council meeting held on 5 July 1989, saying that: "we were born and live under British rule on British land.... It is therefore... our right to ask that you should give us back a place of abode so that we can continue to live under British rule on British land if we so wish.... I represent most of all those who live here to firmly request and demand you to grant us the right to full British citizenship so that we can, if we so wish, live in the [[United Kingdom]], our Motherland...In fact, your resistance to granting us full citizenship and the right of abode in the United Kingdom reflects your doubt about the [[Sino-British Joint Declaration|Joint Declaration]]. Yet the more you lack confidence in it, the stronger is the reason why you should grant us full citizenship to protect us from [[communist]] rule... I say to you that the right of abode in the United Kingdom is the best and the only definitive guarantee....'' With your failure to give us such a guarantee, reluctant as I may, I must advise the people of Hong Kong, and urgently now, each to seek for themselves a home of last resort even if they have to leave to do so''. I do so because, as a legislator, my duty is with the people first and the stability and prosperity of [[Hong Kong]] second, although the two are so interdependent on each other...."</ref><ref>The legislation is sometimes compared with [[Macau]], a former colony of [[Portugal]], where many residents of Chinese descent were granted right of abode in Portugal when Macau was still under colonial rule. They were not deprived of their right of abode after the [[transfer of sovereignty of Macau]] in 1999, their [[Portuguese passport]]s and citizenship are valid and inheritable, and it turned out that many of them still choose to stay in Macau.</ref> There were also British politicians<ref>Then [[Shadow Home Secretary]], [[Jack Straw (politician)|Jack Straw]], said in a letter to the then [[Home Secretary]] [[Michael Howard]] dated 30 January 1997 that a claim that British National (Overseas) status amounts to British nationality "is pure sophistry".[http://www.prnewswire.co.uk/cgi/news/release?id=48962 LABOUR CALL FOR BRITISH CITIZENSHIP FOR HONG KONG ETHNIC ASIANS]", ''PR Newswire Europe Ltd.'', 1997.</ref> and magazines<ref>''[[The Economist]]'' also wrote critically in an article published on 3 July 1997 that "the failure to offer citizenship to most of Hong Kong’s residents was shameful", and "it was the height of cynicism to hand 6m people over to a regime of proven brutality without allowing them any means to move elsewhere." The article commented that the real reason that the new [[Labour Party (UK)|Labour government]] still refused to give full British citizenship to other British Dependent Territories Citizens in around 1997 - because the United Kingdom was waiting until Hong Kong had been disposed of - “would be seen as highly cynical”, as [[Elizabeth Symons, Baroness Symons of Vernham Dean|Baroness Symons]], a [[Foreign Office]] minister, has conceded. "Britain’s colonial obligations", ''[[The Economist]]'', 3 July 1997.</ref> criticizing the nationality.
*The creation of a new nationality (with fewer privileges) has been met with criticism, as many Hong Kong residents felt the British citizenship would have been more appropriate in light of the "moral debt" owed to them by the UK.<ref>For example, the legislative councilor [[Henrietta Ip Man-Hing|Dr Henrietta Ip]] criticized the idea of British National (Overseas) and again urged the UK Parliament, to grant full British citizenship to Hong Kong's British nationals in the council meeting held on 5 July 1989, saying that: "we were born and live under British rule on British land.... It is therefore... our right to ask that you should give us back a place of abode so that we can continue to live under British rule on British land if we so wish.... I represent most of all those who live here to firmly request and demand you to grant us the right to full British citizenship so that we can, if we so wish, live in the [[United Kingdom]], our Motherland...In fact, your resistance to granting us full citizenship and the right of abode in the United Kingdom reflects your doubt about the [[Sino-British Joint Declaration|Joint Declaration]]. Yet the more you lack confidence in it, the stronger is the reason why you should grant us full citizenship to protect us from [[communist]] rule... I say to you that the right of abode in the United Kingdom is the best and the only definitive guarantee....'' With your failure to give us such a guarantee, reluctant as I may, I must advise the people of Hong Kong, and urgently now, each to seek for themselves a home of last resort even if they have to leave to do so''. I do so because, as a legislator, my duty is with the people first and the stability and prosperity of [[Hong Kong]] second, although the two are so interdependent on each other...."</ref><ref>The legislation is sometimes compared with [[Macau]], a former colony of [[Portugal]], where many residents of Chinese descent were granted right of abode in Portugal when Macau was still under colonial rule. They were not deprived of their right of abode after the [[transfer of sovereignty of Macau]] in 1999, their [[Portuguese passport]]s and citizenship are valid and inheritable, and it turned out that many of them still choose to stay in Macau.</ref> There were also British politicians<ref>Then [[Shadow Home Secretary]], [[Jack Straw (politician)|Jack Straw]], said in a letter to the then [[Home Secretary]] [[Michael Howard]] dated 30 January 1997 that a claim that British National (Overseas) status amounts to British nationality "is pure sophistry".[http://www.prnewswire.co.uk/cgi/news/release?id=48962 LABOUR CALL FOR BRITISH CITIZENSHIP FOR HONG KONG ETHNIC ASIANS]", ''PR Newswire Europe Ltd.'', 1997.</ref> and magazines<ref>''[[The Economist]]'' also wrote critically in an article published on 3 July 1997 that "the failure to offer citizenship to most of Hong Kong’s residents was shameful", and "it was the height of cynicism to hand 6m people over to a regime of proven brutality without allowing them any means to move elsewhere." The article commented that the real reason that the new [[Labour Party (UK)|Labour government]] still refused to give full British citizenship to other British Dependent Territories Citizens in around 1997 - because the United Kingdom was waiting until Hong Kong had been disposed of - “would be seen as highly cynical”, as [[Elizabeth Symons, Baroness Symons of Vernham Dean|Baroness Symons]], a [[Foreign Office]] minister, has conceded. "Britain’s colonial obligations", ''[[The Economist]]'', 3 July 1997.</ref> criticizing the nationality.
*The absence of a right to abode in the UK has been seen as an attempt to weaken the link between Hong Kong residents and the [[United Kingdom]].
*The absence of a right to abode in the UK has been seen as an attempt to weaken the link between Hong Kong residents and the [[United Kingdom]].
*The BN(O) status was for some a symbol for the general discontent on the end of British rule, transfer of the colony, and the perceived insufficient protection of the interest of the residents of Hong Kong by the UK.
*The BN(O) status was for some a symbol for the general discontent on the end of British rule, transfer of the colony, and the perceived insufficient protection of the interest of the residents of Hong Kong by the UK.

Revision as of 18:12, 12 June 2011

British National (Overseas), commonly known as BN(O), is one of the major classes of British nationality under British nationality law. Holders of this nationality are British nationals and Commonwealth citizens, but not British Citizens. They are not granted right of abode anywhere, including the United Kingdom and Hong Kong,[1] through their British National (Overseas) status.

The creation of the class of British National (Overseas) was a response to the question of the future prospect of Hong Kong in the 1980s, and therefore the nationality was "tailor-made" for the Hong Kong residents with British Dependent Territories Citizen status by virtue of their connection with Hong Kong. The nationality also served to retain an appropriate relationship with the United Kingdom after the transfer of sovereignty of Hong Kong to the People's Republic of China in 1997.[2] From 1 July 1987 to 1997, around 3.4 million of British Dependent Territories Citizens of Hong Kong (mainly ethnic Chinese), successfully gained British National (Overseas) status by registration. Hong Kong's British Dependent Territories citizenship then ceased to exist after 30 June 1997.

As of 2007, 3.44 million of Hong Kong residents had the status as British National (Overseas), although only 800,000 of them held a valid British National (Overseas) passport. As the BN(O) nationality cannot be gained any more, the number of BN(O)s slowly decreases and will eventually disappear.

Main characteristics

Upon registration (never automatically), British National (Overseas) status can be obtained. The nationality is obtained for life and can not be lost in case of dual nationality. However, the status cannot be passed on to children nor could it be gained after the end of the registration period in 1997. All British Nationals (Overseas) are entitled to enjoy a variety of rights in the United Kingdom[specify] and to use the British National (Overseas) passport as a travel document. Only the minority of the BN(O) that hold no other nationality can register to become British Citizens.[3]

History

Background

By the late 1970s, it had become a public concern in colonial Hong Kong that the 99-year land lease of the New Territories, a major region of Hong Kong, to Britain would expire in around 20 years. The public concern immediately resulted in a series of negotiations between the Chinese and British government in the early 1980s regarding the future prospect of Hong Kong. The negotiations resulted in the Sino-British Joint Declaration on 9 December 1984 stating the transfer of the sovereignety to the People's Republic of China on 1 July 1997.

However, the decision reached by the two governments in the Joint Declaration brought uncertainty to the general public of Hong Kong. Many of them were deeply worried about the prospect of being ruled by the Chinese regime and started to have doubts about the future prospect of Hong Kong. In order to avoid Hong Kong people migrating to Britain and other places, and to reinforce people's confidence in the future of Hong Kong, the British government introduced a new class of British nationality according to the provisions of the United Kingdom Memorandum to the Joint Declaration which would allow Hong Kong's British Dependent Territories Citizens, who were mostly ethnic Chinese, to retain an appropriate relationship with the United Kingdom after 1997.

Creation of the Nationality: Hong Kong Act 1985

After the signing of the Joint Declaration, a new class of British nationality, known as British National (Overseas), was created by the Hong Kong Act 1985. The new nationality was for life, non-inheritable and was specially created for British Dependent Territories citizens of Hong Kong.

File:BNO advertisement.jpg
British National (Overseas) passport advertisement by the British Consulate-General, Hong Kong and Macao in 2004.

The 1985 Act was brought into effect by the Hong Kong (British Nationality) Order 1986. Article 4(2) of the Order provided that adults and minors who had a connection to Hong Kong were entitled to apply for becoming British Nationals (Overseas) by registration.[4]

Becoming a British National (Overseas) was therefore neither an automatic nor an involuntary process and many eligible people who had the requisite connection with Hong Kong never applied to become British Nationals (Overseas). To make it involuntary or automatic would have been contrary to the assurances given to the PRC government which led to the words "eligible to" being used in paragraph (a) of the United Kingdom Memorandum to the Sino-British Joint Declaration. Any person, who failed to register as a British National (Overseas) by 1 July 1997 and would thereby be rendered stateless, automatically became a British Overseas citizen under article 6(1) of the Hong Kong (British Nationality) Order 1986. The deadline for applications passed in 1997.

Registration procedure

The registration procedure of the British National (Overseas) status started on 1 July 1987 and applications could be made in Hong Kong's Immigration Department, passport offices in Britain or passport offices of the British Embassies, Consulates or Missions abroad. The majority however kept their original nationality (BDTC) in the early years when only 15% of the passport applications was for the BN(O) passport.[5] In order to avoid peaks in the registration towards the transfer of sovereignty, the government to divide Hong Kong's British Dependent Territories Citizens into groups by year of birth in 1993, and a deadline for applying British National (Overseas) status and passport was set for each group ranging from 1993 until 30 September 1997. All late applicants (within a certain age group) without a legitimate written-explanation would be deprived of their right to register. Most applications were made on or before 30 June 1997, and British Dependent Territories citizenship of Hong Kong officially ceased to exist after that day. However, those who acquired Hong Kong's British Dependent Territories citizenship between 1 January and 30 June 1997, were allowed to register until 30 September, nearly three months after the transfer of sovereignty of Hong Kong. In light of the United Kingdom Memorandum to the Joint Declaration, 31 December 1997 was the final expiry date to register for British National (Overseas) status.

After the transfer of sovereignty

As of 31 December 1997, around 3.4 million of Hong Kong's British Dependent Territories Citizens had successfully gained British National (Overseas) status and there were around 2.7 million valid British National (Overseas) passports in use. Circa 2 million Hong Kong residents did not obtain British National (Overseas) status. Most of those were not British Dependent Territories Citizens and held only Hong Kong Certificates of Identity, and therefore they were not entitled to registration. Besides, some British Dependent Territories Citizens of Hong Kong acquired British citizenship before 1997 so they did not need to register to be British Nationals (Overseas).

Prior to the transfer of sovereignty, the data of British Nationals (Overseas) were collected and managed by the Immigration Department. Following the transfer of sovereignty, the British Consulate-General Hong Kong has taken over the responsibility for administering the British National (Overseas) database.[6]

BN(O) passports

BN(O)s are entitled to BN(O) passports, which are specific British passports for international travel. They are lookalike versions of regular British Citizen passports, but do not have the text "European Union" on the cover. As of 2010 the passports are biometric.

Specific privileges

British Nationals (Overseas) are Commonwealth citizens and therefore enjoy certain rights in the United Kingdom. For example, they are eligible to join Her Majesty's Civil Service and, if resident in the UK, can vote there.[7] British Nationals (Overseas) can be conferred British honours, receive peerages and become peers of the House of Lords. If living in the UK without any immigration restrictions, they can also stand for election to Parliament and local councils.

British Nationals (Overseas) apply to enter the UK on a working holiday Tier 5 Youth Mobility Scheme (YMS) visa. BN(O) applicants who hold funds of £1600 or more and aged 18–30 are eligible to apply. YMS entry clearance holders are free to perform many activities (with certain restrictions) in the UK for at most two years. BOCs, BOTCs and BN(O)s granted entry clearance under the YMS do not need to be sponsored for the YMS with no quotas.[8][9]

British Nationals (Overseas) can register as full British citizens (rather than having to apply for naturalisation) under section 4 of the British Nationality Act 1981, after living in the United Kingdom for five years; the last year of which must have been without any immigration restrictions (such as by holding Indefinite Leave to Remain (ILR) or its equivalent). Section 4 registration confers British citizenships otherwise than by descent and hence children born subsequently outside the United Kingdom will normally have access to British citizenship.

Restrictions

People's Republic of China

Although British Nationals (Overseas) are basically regarded as British nationals under British nationality law, the People's Republic of China regards British National (Overseas) passports solely as a travel document.[10] British Nationals (Overseas) who are of Chinese descent are solely regarded as Chinese citizens by the People's Republic of China. As a result, they are not entitled to consular protection in Hong Kong, Macau, and the mainland China.[11] This practice is also followed in public cases: when a senior journalist and British National (Overseas), Ching Cheong, of The Straits Times from Singapore was detained, accused and imprisoned from April 2005 to February 2008 by the government of People's Republic of China for alleged espionage by providing state secrets to Taiwan, the British government refused to provide consular protection to him despite civil rights groups urging the Foreign Office to do so. The British Foreign Office explained that they could provide assistance to Ching Cheong, but they simply could not intervene in the judicial proceedings of other countries.[12]

Republic of China (Taiwan)

The Republic of China only fully recognizes British citizens but not British Nationals (Overseas) since they are mostly ethnic Chinese. Holders of British National (Overseas) passports or Hong Kong Special Administration Region passports need an Exit & Entry Permit (landing visa) specific for China to enter Taiwan.[13]

Absence of right of abode in the UK

The class of British National (Overseas) was specially created for British Dependent Territories Citizens of Hong Kong, and the British government does not provide them with right of abode in the United Kingdom. Different from most of the nationalities all over the world, the status of British National (Overseas) is neither inheritable nor transferable. It means that the children of British Nationals (Overseas) who are not British Nationals (Overseas) themselves cannot gain this nationality from their parents. In other words, the British National (Overseas) parents have no right to pass this nationality to their non-British National (Overseas) children.

Criticism

  • The creation of a new nationality (with fewer privileges) has been met with criticism, as many Hong Kong residents felt the British citizenship would have been more appropriate in light of the "moral debt" owed to them by the UK.[14][15] There were also British politicians[16] and magazines[17] criticizing the nationality.
  • The absence of a right to abode in the UK has been seen as an attempt to weaken the link between Hong Kong residents and the United Kingdom.
  • The BN(O) status was for some a symbol for the general discontent on the end of British rule, transfer of the colony, and the perceived insufficient protection of the interest of the residents of Hong Kong by the UK.
  • The British Nationality Law 1981 has been criticised that different classes of British statuses are in fact closely related to the ethnic origin of the holder by experts [18] as well as by the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination of United Nations[19]

See also

Travel documents

Nationality (law)

Other

Footnotes

  1. ^ [1], Written Answers, House of Lords (4 November 2008)
  2. ^ "United Kingdom Memorandum", Sino-British Joint Declaration, 1984.
  3. ^ Within the Borders, Citizenship and Immigration Act 2009 BN(O)'s may register as British citizens provided they held no other nationalities or citizenships on 19 March 2009
  4. ^ "Connection to Hong Kong" refers to Hongkongers who gained British Dependent Territories Citizen status by birth, by naturalization, by adoption or by descent.
  5. ^ From 1 July 1987 to 31 December 1989, the Hong Kong government had issued a total of 731,600 passports, in which 85% or 630,700 of them were British Dependent Territories Citizen passports. In contrast, only 100,916 of British National (Overseas) passports were issued[citation needed].
  6. ^ Lords Hansard, British House of Lords, 22 March 2007
  7. ^ Representation of the People Act 1983, Section 4
  8. ^ TEMPORARY WORKERS AND YOUTH MOBILITY UNDER THE POINTS BASED SYSTEM - (TIER 5) STATEMENT OF INTENT
  9. ^ Tier 5 (Youth Mobility Scheme) of the Points Based System Policy Guidance
  10. ^ In light of the Nationality Law of the People's Republic of China and the decision made in the 19th session of the 8th Standing Committee of the National People's Congress
  11. ^ Explanations of some questions by the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress concerning the implementation of the Nationality Law of the People's Republic of China in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, The Nineteenth Session of the Standing Committee of the Eighth National People's Congress, 15 May 1996.
  12. ^ "Ching Cheong Under House-Arrest in China and Allowed to Contact Family", The Sun, 6 June 2005. (in Chinese)
  13. ^ "Entry requirements" Taiwan, Foreign and Commonwealth Office, retrieved in 2008.
  14. ^ For example, the legislative councilor Dr Henrietta Ip criticized the idea of British National (Overseas) and again urged the UK Parliament, to grant full British citizenship to Hong Kong's British nationals in the council meeting held on 5 July 1989, saying that: "we were born and live under British rule on British land.... It is therefore... our right to ask that you should give us back a place of abode so that we can continue to live under British rule on British land if we so wish.... I represent most of all those who live here to firmly request and demand you to grant us the right to full British citizenship so that we can, if we so wish, live in the United Kingdom, our Motherland...In fact, your resistance to granting us full citizenship and the right of abode in the United Kingdom reflects your doubt about the Joint Declaration. Yet the more you lack confidence in it, the stronger is the reason why you should grant us full citizenship to protect us from communist rule... I say to you that the right of abode in the United Kingdom is the best and the only definitive guarantee.... With your failure to give us such a guarantee, reluctant as I may, I must advise the people of Hong Kong, and urgently now, each to seek for themselves a home of last resort even if they have to leave to do so. I do so because, as a legislator, my duty is with the people first and the stability and prosperity of Hong Kong second, although the two are so interdependent on each other...."
  15. ^ The legislation is sometimes compared with Macau, a former colony of Portugal, where many residents of Chinese descent were granted right of abode in Portugal when Macau was still under colonial rule. They were not deprived of their right of abode after the transfer of sovereignty of Macau in 1999, their Portuguese passports and citizenship are valid and inheritable, and it turned out that many of them still choose to stay in Macau.
  16. ^ Then Shadow Home Secretary, Jack Straw, said in a letter to the then Home Secretary Michael Howard dated 30 January 1997 that a claim that British National (Overseas) status amounts to British nationality "is pure sophistry".LABOUR CALL FOR BRITISH CITIZENSHIP FOR HONG KONG ETHNIC ASIANS", PR Newswire Europe Ltd., 1997.
  17. ^ The Economist also wrote critically in an article published on 3 July 1997 that "the failure to offer citizenship to most of Hong Kong’s residents was shameful", and "it was the height of cynicism to hand 6m people over to a regime of proven brutality without allowing them any means to move elsewhere." The article commented that the real reason that the new Labour government still refused to give full British citizenship to other British Dependent Territories Citizens in around 1997 - because the United Kingdom was waiting until Hong Kong had been disposed of - “would be seen as highly cynical”, as Baroness Symons, a Foreign Office minister, has conceded. "Britain’s colonial obligations", The Economist, 3 July 1997.
  18. ^ for exampleAnn Dummett, an expert in this area, criticised that "There is no indication at all in our nationality law of ethnic origin being a criterion. But the purpose of the law since 1981, and the manner in which it is implemented, make sure that ethnic origin is in fact and in practice a deciding factor." [2], Letter to Franco FRATTINI, Standing committee of experts on international immigration, refugee and criminal law. Date: 25 September 2006. Ms Dummett also said that the 1981 Nationality Act in effect gave full British citizenship to a group of whom at least 96% are white people, and the other, less favourable forms of British nationality to groups who are at least 98% non-white.Lack of basic human rights in the Borders, Citizenship and Immigration Bill, BritishHongKong
  19. ^ In March 1996, there was a submission to the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination of United Nations. The committee criticised the arrangements of the BN(O) nationality under "Principal subjects of concern": The Government's statement that South Asian residents of Hong Kong are granted some form of British nationality, whether that of a British National Overseas (BNO) or a British Overseas Citizen (BOC), so that no resident of Hong Kong would be left stateless following the transfer of sovereignty is noted with interest. It is, however, a matter of concern that such status does not grant the bearer the right of abode in the United Kingdom and contrasts with the full citizenship status conferred upon a predominantly white population living in another dependent territory. It is noted that most of the persons holding BNO or BOC status are Asians and that judgements on applications for citizenship appear to vary according to the country of origin, which leads to the assumption that this practice reveals elements of racial discrimination. Concluding observations of the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination : United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. 28/03/96.

References

Other materials

Template:Link GA