Talk:Ali Moeen Nawazish: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Vakanuvis789 (talk | contribs) m →Inspiration: new section |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Please, stop trying to protect the reputation of Nawazish by removing references to non-perfect results. Consistently, every couple of weeks, someone tries to remove the fact that he got 2.2s or a B and a C. Wikipedia is supposed to be factual and relevant, it is not to be used as promotional propaganda. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/95.147.225.183|95.147.225.183]] ([[User talk:95.147.225.183|talk]]) 12:19, 27 July 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
Please, stop trying to protect the reputation of Nawazish by removing references to non-perfect results. Consistently, every couple of weeks, someone tries to remove the fact that he got 2.2s or a B and a C. Wikipedia is supposed to be factual and relevant, it is not to be used as promotional propaganda. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/95.147.225.183|95.147.225.183]] ([[User talk:95.147.225.183|talk]]) 12:19, 27 July 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
:I second that. Nawazish and family (I know you're reading this), a 2.2 from Cambridge is nothing to be ashamed of. I remind you that Wikipedia is not your personal fan page. All relevant content is to be included, even content that may jeopardize the success of your business. Congrats on pulling through and getting the 2.1 in your third year. 13:57, 3 August 2011 (UTC) |
|||
== Inspiration == |
== Inspiration == |
Revision as of 13:57, 3 August 2011
Biography Stub‑class | |||||||
|
Pakistan Stub‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Please, stop trying to protect the reputation of Nawazish by removing references to non-perfect results. Consistently, every couple of weeks, someone tries to remove the fact that he got 2.2s or a B and a C. Wikipedia is supposed to be factual and relevant, it is not to be used as promotional propaganda. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.147.225.183 (talk) 12:19, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
- I second that. Nawazish and family (I know you're reading this), a 2.2 from Cambridge is nothing to be ashamed of. I remind you that Wikipedia is not your personal fan page. All relevant content is to be included, even content that may jeopardize the success of your business. Congrats on pulling through and getting the 2.1 in your third year. 13:57, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
Inspiration
Wow. I would love to get know know this guy and have a chat for a while to get inspired. I have many questions for him. --Vakanuvis789 (talk) 16:08, 29 July 2011 (UTC)