Social evolution: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
either: ...Category:Human evolution....or a new category of Category:Human societal evolution (there are already subcats for it) |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
This classification was proposed by [[W. D. Hamilton]].{{Citation needed|date=September 2007}} He proposes that natural selection favors mutually beneficial or selfish behaviors. Hamilton's insight was to show how [[kin selection]] could explain [[altruism]] and [[spite]]. |
This classification was proposed by [[W. D. Hamilton]].{{Citation needed|date=September 2007}} He proposes that natural selection favors mutually beneficial or selfish behaviors. Hamilton's insight was to show how [[kin selection]] could explain [[altruism]] and [[spite]]. |
||
Social evolution is also often regarded (especially, in the field of [[social anthropology]]) as evolution of social |
Social evolution is also often regarded (especially, in the field of [[social anthropology]]) as evolution of [[social system]]s and structures.<ref>see, e.g., ''Evolution and culture''. Ed. by Marshall David Sahlins and Elman Service. Ann Arbor, MI: Univ. of Michigan Press, 1960; [[Andrey Korotayev]], [[Nikolay Kradin]], Victor de Munck, and Valeri Lynsha. [http://www.scribd.com/doc/16861617/Korotayev-Kradin-Lynsha-Alternatives-of-Social-Evolution-An-Introduction-Alternatives-of-Social-Evolution-Ed-by-NKradin-AKorotayev-Vde-M Alternatives of Social Evolution: An Introduction]. ''Alternatives of Social Evolution''. Vladivostok: Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2009. P.12-59.</ref> |
||
In 2010, famed Harvard biologist [[E. O. Wilson]], a founder of modern sociobiology, proposed a new theory of social evolution.<ref name=Keim>{{cite web |first=Brandon |last=Keim |url=http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2010/08/kin-selection-challenged/ |title=E.O. Wilson Proposes New Theory of Social Evolution |publisher=Wired |date=August 26, 2010}}</ref> He argued that the traditional approach of focusing on eusociality had limitations, which he illustrated primarily with examples from the insect world.<ref name=Keim/> |
In 2010, famed Harvard biologist [[E. O. Wilson]], a founder of modern sociobiology, proposed a new theory of social evolution.<ref name=Keim>{{cite web |first=Brandon |last=Keim |url=http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2010/08/kin-selection-challenged/ |title=E.O. Wilson Proposes New Theory of Social Evolution |publisher=Wired |date=August 26, 2010}}</ref> He argued that the traditional approach of focusing on eusociality had limitations, which he illustrated primarily with examples from the insect world.<ref name=Keim/> |
||
Revision as of 00:57, 27 August 2011
 |
Social evolution is a subdiscipline of evolutionary biology that is concerned with social behaviors that have fitness consequences for individuals other than the actor. Social behaviors can be categorized according to the fitness consequences they entail for the actor and recipient.
- Mutually beneficial – a behavior that increases the direct fitness of both the actor and the recipient
- Selfish – a behavior that increases the direct fitness of the actor, but the recipient suffers a loss
- Altruistic – a behavior that increases the direct fitness of the recipient, but the actor suffers a loss
- Spiteful – a behavior that decreases the direct fitness of both the actor and the recipient
This classification was proposed by W. D. Hamilton.[citation needed] He proposes that natural selection favors mutually beneficial or selfish behaviors. Hamilton's insight was to show how kin selection could explain altruism and spite.
Social evolution is also often regarded (especially, in the field of social anthropology) as evolution of social systems and structures.[1]
In 2010, famed Harvard biologist E. O. Wilson, a founder of modern sociobiology, proposed a new theory of social evolution.[2] He argued that the traditional approach of focusing on eusociality had limitations, which he illustrated primarily with examples from the insect world.[2]
A parallel theory of progressive social evolution has been advanced by followers of Herbert Spencer (1820–1903).[3] This theory rejects the conventional religious concept of human sin, which was based on the idea that, after the fall from grace, the human condition was eternally corrupt.[4]
See also
Notes
- ^ see, e.g., Evolution and culture. Ed. by Marshall David Sahlins and Elman Service. Ann Arbor, MI: Univ. of Michigan Press, 1960; Andrey Korotayev, Nikolay Kradin, Victor de Munck, and Valeri Lynsha. Alternatives of Social Evolution: An Introduction. Alternatives of Social Evolution. Vladivostok: Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2009. P.12-59.
- ^ a b Keim, Brandon (August 26, 2010). "E.O. Wilson Proposes New Theory of Social Evolution". Wired.
- ^ http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/551217/social-evolution
- ^ http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/222234/Christian-fundamentalism/2530/Origins?anchor=ref883412
References
- Carver, Thomas Nixon (1935). The Essential Factors of Social Evolution. Chapter links, pp. ix-xi.
- Frank, S.A. (1998). Foundations of social evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ.[1]
- Hamilton, W.D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behavior I and II. — Journal of Theoretical Biology 7: 1-16 and 17-52.
- Korotayev, Andrey (2004). World Religions and Social Evolution of the Old World Oikumene Civilizations: A Cross-cultural Perspective (First Edition ed.). Lewiston, New York: Edwin Mellen Press. ISBN 0-7734-6310-0.
{{cite book}}:|edition=has extra text (help)
External links
- Alternatives of Social Evolution: An Introduction
- Carneiro R. Stellar Evolution and Social Evolution: A Study in Parallel Processes. Social Evolution & History 2005. Vol. 4(1), pp. 136-159