Talk:Advanced System Optimizer: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 16:01, 17 September 2011

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Advanced System Optimizer article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Computing Unassessed

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Software: Computing Unassessed

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

About the differences section

This template must be substituted. 82.19.4.7 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) says that the differences section that was in the article is not appropriate for an encyclopedia: [1], [2]. First of all, it is not comparison with the other product in any way, it is just to pretty much give information about a few differences of each product. Some discussion is shown here. I would like a third opinion on this. -Porch corpter (talk/contribs) 10:15, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete both articles. Although scraping the literal bar of "notability from sources" by the absolute skin of their teeth, neither of these articles have any real encyclopedic value. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:32, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
How don't they have encyclopedic value? Please explain. This is NOT a deletion discussion, it's to resolve a content dispute using 3O. Just so you know, articles that don't look fully encyclopedic can be tagged with {{unencyclopedic}}, or any other appropriate cleanup tag and improved to an encyclopedia style. Thanks. -Porch corpter (talk/contribs) 10:38, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Andy that they need to be deleted. I've had a look for some content but there's nothing that elevates this software above the many other software packages that do the same thing. I'm not suggesting that they are culled from the encyclopaedia completely, they could probably be included in a List of Maintenance Software article if such exists. The disputed section is not appropriate. It's not clear from the article why the comparison between the two needs to be emphasised. There's no connection other than they do something similar. --Bill ^{(talk|contribs)} 16:01, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 * Delete both articles. Although scraping the literal bar of "notability from sources" by the absolute skin of their teeth, neither of these articles have any real encyclopedic value. [[User:Andy Dingley|Andy Dingley]] ([[User talk:Andy Dingley|talk]]) 10:32, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
 *:How don't they have encyclopedic value? Please explain. This is NOT a [[WP:XFD|deletion discussion]], it's to resolve a content dispute using 3O. Just so you know, articles that don't look fully encyclopedic can be tagged with {{tl|unencyclopedic}}, or any other appropriate [[WP:TMC|cleanup tag]] and improved to an encyclopedia style. Thanks. -'''''[[User:Porchcorpter|Porch corpter]]''''' <span style="font-size:12px;">([[User talk:Porchcorpter#top|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Porchcorpter|contribs]])</span> 10:38, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
+*::I agree with Andy that they need to be deleted. I've had a look for some content but there's nothing that elevates this software above the many other software packages that do the same thing. I'm not suggesting that they are culled from the encyclopaedia completely, they could probably be included in a List of Maintenance Software article if such exists. The disputed section is not appropriate. It's not clear from the article why the comparison between the two needs to be emphasised. There's no connection other than they do something similar. --[[User:Bill|Bill]]&nbsp;<sup>([[User_talk:Bill|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Bill|contribs]])</sup> 16:01, 17 September 2011 (UTC)