Jump to content

Talk:2011 Italian referendums: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 14: Line 14:


:I'm only going by automatic translations of the sources, but it looks as though ND in some cases means the party encouraged people to vote, but didn't adopt an official position, and in other cases that they discouraged voting. I think it would be good if an Italian speaker could put this information into the table, given the importance of turnout in these referendums. [[Special:Contributions/81.98.38.48|81.98.38.48]] ([[User talk:81.98.38.48|talk]]) 18:13, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
:I'm only going by automatic translations of the sources, but it looks as though ND in some cases means the party encouraged people to vote, but didn't adopt an official position, and in other cases that they discouraged voting. I think it would be good if an Italian speaker could put this information into the table, given the importance of turnout in these referendums. [[Special:Contributions/81.98.38.48|81.98.38.48]] ([[User talk:81.98.38.48|talk]]) 18:13, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

::Being Italian, I can. I have the intention to work on the article in the near future. [[User:Angelikfire|Angelikfire]] ([[User talk:Angelikfire|talk]]) 19:27, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:27, 21 September 2011

WikiProject iconItaly Stub‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconPolitics Unassessed Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Should there be an explanation here of what the four questions are? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ziosmithy (talkcontribs) 07:46, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, the 4 questions need to be listed, and maybe also explained. 78.134.84.245 (talk) 19:34, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also, is there a good reason for "ND" (No direction) rather than a dash (-) or a question mark (?) ? Because "ND" is too similar to "NO" in my opinion. Unless it's wikipedia policy to say "ND", those boxes should be replaced with question marks or dashes. 78.134.84.245 (talk) 19:34, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. I was confused for a minute or two bu the ND/NO similarity (especially as there are almost no NOs at all). Studying the legend sorted it out, but it is unclear. +1 for "-". Martinwguy (talk) 00:53, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm only going by automatic translations of the sources, but it looks as though ND in some cases means the party encouraged people to vote, but didn't adopt an official position, and in other cases that they discouraged voting. I think it would be good if an Italian speaker could put this information into the table, given the importance of turnout in these referendums. 81.98.38.48 (talk) 18:13, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Being Italian, I can. I have the intention to work on the article in the near future. Angelikfire (talk) 19:27, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]