User talk:AmandaNP

Archives (Index)

2009/December 2010/January 2010/February 2010/March 2010/April 2010/May 2010/June 2010/July 2010/August 2010/September 2010/October 2010/November 2010/December 2011/January 2011/February 2011/March 2011/April 2011/May 2011/June 2011/July 2011/August 2011/September 2011/October 2011/November 2011/December 2012/January 2012/February 2012/March ISI 2012/April 2012/May 2012/June 2012/September 2012/August 2012/July 2012/October 2012/December 2012/November 2013/January 2013/March 2013/February 2013/April 2013/May 2013/June 2013/July 2013/August 2013/September 2013/October 2013/November 2013/December 2014/January 2014/Early 2014 2014/July 2014/August 2014/September 2014/October 2014/December 2014/November 2015/March-July 2015/January 2015/February 2015/August-November 2015/December 2016/January-February 2016/March-May 2016/June 2016/June-October 2016/November-December 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

poop patrol

• Hi, I'm ready for the weekly run. BTW there are a couple of improvements to it that would be really useful if you could do them. ϢereSpielChequers 09:58, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

 Done Let me know what changes I could make and i'll see what I can do. (might even rewrite the code, not sure) -- DQ (t) (e) 13:42, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, the most useful possible change would be to ignore wikilinks when checking for safe phrases. Currently the code is thrown by them - so for Tittle for example most of the pages that laboriously went into the safe pages list were ones which mentioned Y.A. Tittle, but as they were wikilinked they all had to be added as safe pages. There are some queries that I can't run because it would be too time consuming without this. For example forth is often a typo for fourth but there are so many articles linking to Forth Rail Bridge and Firth of Forth that it isn't feasible. P.S. I'm ready for another run. ϢereSpielChequers 21:11, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

Future timestamp for when i can get to this. -- DQ (t) (e) 23:15, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

heyya

hi there! i am a part of wikiproject India under which i have to create few pages in the wikibook.As you are pretty experienced,i think you can be a very helping guide.so i request you to adopt me as a user...waiting for you reply!divya crazy 27 06:58, 10 October 2011 (UTC) (talk)

I would love to help you out, but i'm sorry at this point in my life i'm busy (see notice at top) and have very little time for Wikipedia other than how I already contribute. I think you would be better off with another mentor. Sorry to disappoint. -- DQ (t) (e) 13:54, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 October 2011

• Opinion essay: The conservatism of Wikimedians

• News and notes: Largest ever donation to WMF, final findings of editor survey released, 'Terms of use' heavily revised

• In the news: Uproar over Italian shutdown, the varying reception of BLP mischief, and Wikipedia's doctor-evangelist

• WikiProject report: The World's Oldest People

• Featured content: The weird and the disgusting

• Arbitration report: Senkaku Islands closes; administrators authorized to place articles on discretionary sanctions

• Technology report: 1.18 deployment and HTTPS switchover completed, but developer help now needed with new projects

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:18, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 07:45, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	For your tremendous work... all over, well, everywhere. Thanks for everything. Philippe Beaudette, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 19:23, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

Even while i'm on wikibreak lol. Thanks :) -- DQ (t) (e) 23:14, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

Please review these blocks

There was a bug in MediaWiki 1.18 that caused blocks made via the API to have talk page access disabled when it should have been enabled. This also affected scripts such as User:Animum/easyblock.js. Please review the following blocks to make sure that you really intended talk page access to be disabled, and reblock if necessary.

1. Melon fucka (talk · block log · block user) by DeltaQuad at 2011-10-05T07:08:02Z, expires infinity: {{uw-uhblock}}
2. BRETT9 (talk · block log · block user) by DeltaQuad at 2011-10-05T15:42:57Z, expires infinity: sharing the password = forbidden: Might as well hit all the other settings while were at it if it's comprimised
3. PENUS111 (talk · block log · block user) by DeltaQuad at 2011-10-05T17:32:55Z, expires infinity: {{uw-uhblock}}
4. Creepystalker101 (talk · block log · block user) by DeltaQuad at 2011-10-06T06:53:41Z, expires infinity: {{uw-vaublock}}
5. WARNICKMetroChoreMissions (talk · block log · block user) by DeltaQuad at 2011-10-06T08:27:15Z, expires infinity: {{uw-softerblock}}
6. Themandapam (talk · block log · block user) by DeltaQuad at 2011-10-06T08:28:19Z, expires infinity: {{uw-softerblock}}
7. Shamalgroup (talk · block log · block user) by DeltaQuad at 2011-10-06T08:29:06Z, expires infinity: {{uw-softerblock}}
8. Scigenus (talk · block log · block user) by DeltaQuad at 2011-10-06T08:30:27Z, expires infinity: {{uw-softerblock}}
9. Bahrain Bay (talk · block log · block user) by DeltaQuad at 2011-10-10T13:07:43Z, expires infinity: {{uw-softerblock}}
10. Pug In Your Ass (talk · block log · block user) by DeltaQuad at 2011-10-11T07:49:23Z, expires infinity: {{uw-uhblock}}
11. Fagitron (talk · block log · block user) by DeltaQuad at 2011-10-11T07:57:08Z, expires infinity: {{uw-uhblock}}
12. DONTSPAMDONTSPAMDONTSPAM (talk · block log · block user) by DeltaQuad at 2011-10-11T17:53:17Z, expires infinity: {{uw-ublock}}

If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to post at User talk:Anomie#Allowusertalk issue. Thanks! Anomie⚔ 02:04, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

Working on these at DQ's request. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 02:11, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

Should all be fixed now. The only one I didn't correct was the compromised account, as it looks like you intended it there. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 02:32, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

Bobmarley201111

Hello. I'm not sure if you recall this SP case from the other day, but you closed it due to what you felt was inconclusive evidence and suggested in the meantime that we assume good faith. Well the user appears to have returned with yet another SP account on the same article [1]. It seems highly unlikely that three consecutive accounts that have similar names, were recently created, write in the same style, have similar editing rationales, focus typically exclusively on the same unpopular page, where they only perform image edits and revert back to the same images on top of that would not belong to the same person. Could we perhaps do something here? If for whatever reason you are unable to, can you at least direct me to an administrator that maybe can? Soupforone (talk) 19:35, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

-I am not a sockpuppet I've made it obvious Habitmeans383883=Bobmarley201111=Youngladladlad1911=Occurrules2013=driverock2013; I just forgot password every time. I am certainly not trying to masquerade as a different user when I am editing the same two pages at about the same time!I Have not violated the 3RR; but soupforone quite possibly has. Driverock2013 (talk)