Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lianna (comics): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 17: Line 17:
<hr style="width:55%;" />
<hr style="width:55%;" />
*'''Merge''' into [[Guardians of the Universe]] as she is one. [[User:Colonel Warden|Warden]] ([[User talk:Colonel Warden|talk]]) 09:12, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
*'''Merge''' into [[Guardians of the Universe]] as she is one. [[User:Colonel Warden|Warden]] ([[User talk:Colonel Warden|talk]]) 09:12, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
*I can go with a merge, but I'm still trying to figure out what would be considered acceptable sources for notability...--[[User:Marhawkman|Marhawkman]] ([[User talk:Marhawkman|talk]]) 21:38, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:38, 23 October 2011

Lianna (comics)‎

Lianna (comics)‎ (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. There is no evidence that the fictional character as a topic has significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, so she does not not meet the general notability guideline. Also, without reliable secondary sources that give reception or significance to the fictional character, any article about her can only be a plot-only description of a fictional work and an indiscriminate collection of information. Jfgslo (talk) 22:26, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Jfgslo (talk) 22:27, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Jfgslo (talk) 22:27, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 02:11, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]