Talk:TO-92: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m moved Talk:TO92 to Talk:TO-92: Article self-consistency and consistency with other TO articles |
→Seam in packaging: new section |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Michael |
Michael |
||
--[[Special:Contributions/71.112.12.154|71.112.12.154]] ([[User talk:71.112.12.154|talk]]) 19:45, 26 November 2009 (UTC) |
--[[Special:Contributions/71.112.12.154|71.112.12.154]] ([[User talk:71.112.12.154|talk]]) 19:45, 26 November 2009 (UTC) |
||
== Seam in packaging == |
|||
The statement regarding the "seam" in the package is accurate. If you can squint hard enough to read the label printed on the front of the package, the seam is more than visible. [[Special:Contributions/128.171.60.158|128.171.60.158]] ([[User talk:128.171.60.158|talk]]) 00:10, 1 November 2011 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 00:10, 1 November 2011
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the TO-92 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
ESD is not related to case style.
This article states under heading "Disadvantges", "Many models are easily vulnerable to electrostatic discharge (ESD)."
ESD sensitivity is a function of the circuits inside the case, not the of the case style itself. That sentence should to be removed.
Michael --71.112.12.154 (talk) 19:45, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
Seam in packaging
The statement regarding the "seam" in the package is accurate. If you can squint hard enough to read the label printed on the front of the package, the seam is more than visible. 128.171.60.158 (talk) 00:10, 1 November 2011 (UTC)