Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pull-Paar, Noida: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 19:37, 13 November 2011

Pull-Paar, Noida

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I think, but I am not sure, that this is an article about a newly built or soon to be built neighbourhood in Noida. No references, no structure, not clear what the author wants with this article. Better start from scratch. Night of the Big Wind _talk 22:26, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:44, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~ - The article isn't entirely clear on whether it a housing development, neighbourhood, etc. From what I can gather, it is not a town. It is likely an informal designation for an area within Noida. The realty web site referenced in the article verifies the area exists. And I found other realty site that mention it. But there is no coverage about it in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 16:30, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Noida given the information below. -- Whpq (talk) 22:05, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep / Merge - Actually its a place located at a little distance from Delhi.The area does exist as seen from the source. But my reason for keeping this article is the agitation against land acquisition which is garnering a lot of interest in the media and thus making this place notable-->WP:GNG.Documented in "Hindustan Times","The Hindu Business Line"

Traffic snarls ( ! ) being documented in papers like "India Today","Hindustan Times"

Moreover one can see that Mahamaya flyover and its adjoining areas fall under Noida.The Noida article in WP has this to say "Many villages are visible from the Noida Expressway, beginning from the Mahamaya flyover to Greater Noida on both sides." But I strongly believe that this article may be even more effective if merged with Noida.The parts which are not backed up by reliable source may be deleted."Pull Paar' is a hindi word and thus article may also be renamed to "Areas adjoining Mahamaya Flyover". Vivekananda De--tAlK 13:56, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

- Comment - I reviewed those sources and not a single one mentions "Pull-Paar". Did I miss something? It demonstrates that Noida is notable, but that isn't at issue here. Is Pull-Paar a neighbourhood, housing development, village, ...? I remain completely in the dark. I'm not adverse to keeping this article, but we need sources. -- Whpq (talk) 20:12, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - Reply - This is what I meant by saying its a weak keep. "Pull - Paar" is a hindi word which means "Pull"-->bridge / flyover "Paar"-->Crossing.Thus the article is on the land adjoining "Mahamaya Flyover" and its problems.You wont find a reference to "Pull Paar" because all of them refer to "mahamaya flyover" ,land acquisition nearby (Mahamaya Flyover is near sector 44,near amity school--in a photo in one of the sources)it and the traffic snarls on it.Its also the reason why I said it to be renamed as "Areas adjoining Mahamaya Flyover" because the flyover is the main point in it. Now, the sources make "Areas adjoining Mahamaya Flyover" notable.Moreover,the flyover is in Noida and it would make a healthy addition because the land acquisition issue is not addressed in the Noida article. My bad ,I should have described it more profusely earlier.Vivekananda De--tAlK 03:26, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    - Reply - Thanks for the explanation. Things now make a lot more sense. It seems to me that this is not yet a notable neigbourhood or area yet, and as such would belong in the Noida article. --- Whpq (talk) 22:05, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
      - Reply - No need for thanks, its my mistake.I should have described it in a better way.Yes, notability is still an issue which is why I have said its a weak keep/merge. Vivekananda De--tAlK 09:33, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete / Merge - No evidence of notability. May be worth a mention in the Noida entry, but someone should come up with a RS reference, if that is the decision. Ebikeguy (talk) 21:44, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge No evidence of NN, should be put into the Noida entry, otherwise Delete. Jab843 (talk) 21:46, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Confused and contextless essay, nothing worth salvaging. Also no sources, therefore not mergeable. Any coverage of this subject would need to be rewritten from scratch. Sandstein 10:11, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Not notable yet. Better described in Noida in the Economy section under Real estate issues. Pmresource (talk) 19:37, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 25: / Line 25: @@
 *'''Merge''' No evidence of NN, should be put into the Noida entry, otherwise Delete. [[User:Jab843|Jab843]] ([[User talk:Jab843|talk]]) 21:46, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
 *'''Delete'''. Confused and contextless essay, nothing worth salvaging. Also no sources, therefore not mergeable. Any coverage of this subject would need to be rewritten from scratch. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<font style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">'''&nbsp;Sandstein&nbsp;'''</font>]]</span></small> 10:11, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''': Not notable ''yet''. Better described in [[Noida]] in the Economy section under ''Real estate issues''. [[User:Pmresource|Pmresource]] ([[User talk:Pmresource|talk]]) 19:37, 13 November 2011 (UTC)