Talk:Cum shot: Difference between revisions
m Signing comment by 188.220.207.185 - "" |
|||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
:Seconded. [[User:Maikel|Maikel]] ([[User talk:Maikel|talk]]) 10:19, 27 May 2011 (UTC) |
:Seconded. [[User:Maikel|Maikel]] ([[User talk:Maikel|talk]]) 10:19, 27 May 2011 (UTC) |
||
:I want to see the guy's face! [[Special:Contributions/200.83.59.63|200.83.59.63]] ([[User talk:200.83.59.63|talk]]) 15:12, 16 January 2011 (UTC) |
:I want to see the guy's face! [[Special:Contributions/200.83.59.63|200.83.59.63]] ([[User talk:200.83.59.63|talk]]) 15:12, 16 January 2011 (UTC) |
||
: Better is just edit this illustration by saving only the lips or graphically illustrated only mouth (without face, nose, eyes or etc.). And the word "woman" need to be deleted - just leave "mouth".[[User:Westsomething|Westsomething]] ([[User talk:Westsomething|talk]]) 05:44, 30 November 2011 (UTC) |
|||
== What happened to the black guy? == |
== What happened to the black guy? == |
Revision as of 05:44, 30 November 2011
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cum shot article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 180 days |
If you find some images offensive you can configure your browser to mask them. |
Wikipedia is not censored. Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Wikipedia's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options for not seeing an image. |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
This article was nominated for deletion on 3 October 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
Copyedit
The grammar and above all the punctuation in this piece is haphazard and not all all thought through.
What happened to the video
There used to be a video demonstrating the technique in human form. What happened to it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.60.214.65 (talk) 19:52, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
Illustration
I'm just curious, why is the illustration on this article depicting a man ejaculating into a woman's mouth? Surely a better (ie less misleading) illustration would simply be of a male subject ejaculating, since that is essentially what a cumshot is? Or must every illustration accompanying a sex-related article look as though it has been taken from the mind of a 15 year old boy? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.211.148.246 (talk) 17:56, 9 November 2010 (UTC) Simply put, yes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.60.214.65 (talk) 07:29, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
- Seconded. Maikel (talk) 10:19, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
- I want to see the guy's face! 200.83.59.63 (talk) 15:12, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
- Better is just edit this illustration by saving only the lips or graphically illustrated only mouth (without face, nose, eyes or etc.). And the word "woman" need to be deleted - just leave "mouth".Westsomething (talk) 05:44, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
What happened to the black guy?
A few years ago when I stumbled onto this page, it was a black dude splashing the lube on a white chick. Low and behold three years later, it's a white guy doing it to a smiling white chick. This is why Wikipedia is a joke....everything gets fitted up to what The Man wants. Sad. Frekin' sad. This was the image: File:Semfac01.png. sO Why was it changed? Cos I is black?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.156.26.156 (talk) 19:48, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
I think you're looking for the Facial page.Kornflakes89 (talk) 04:44, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
- I wouldnt say she was white. She looks "asian" to me. RACIST! ;-) (User:EDit) 23:24, 15 Novement 2011 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.220.207.185 (talk)
Really?
Does Wikipedia need to get a pornographic picture of [I]everything[/I] sexual? If I wanted to see some cum dripping from a girl's mouth, I would go to redtube. Seriously, Wikipedia? Runningninja (talk) 20:34, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
- See the boxes at the top of the page, the ones that say you can censor these images for yourself and that Wikipedia isn't censored?--Prosfilaes (talk) 23:27, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
Umm why
why is this needed on wikipedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.18.82.96 (talk) 00:33, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
- Wikipedia objectionable content
- Start-Class Sexology and sexuality articles
- Mid-importance Sexology and sexuality articles
- WikiProject Sexology and sexuality articles
- Start-Class Pornography articles
- Mid-importance Pornography articles
- Start-Class Mid-importance Pornography articles
- WikiProject Pornography articles