Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Battlecruisers of Japan/archive1: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Battlecruisers of Japan: +S w/ note |
|||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
*'''Comment''' - Please give all of the images used in the articles alt texts. Some articles, like the Amagi class article, already have alts. Others do not. [[User:Sven Manguard|<font color="207004"><big>'''S</big>ven <big>M</big>anguard'''</font>]] [[User talk:Sven Manguard|<small><font color="F0A804">'''Wha?'''</font></small>]] 12:56, 14 November 2011 (UTC) |
*'''Comment''' - Please give all of the images used in the articles alt texts. Some articles, like the Amagi class article, already have alts. Others do not. [[User:Sven Manguard|<font color="207004"><big>'''S</big>ven <big>M</big>anguard'''</font>]] [[User talk:Sven Manguard|<small><font color="F0A804">'''Wha?'''</font></small>]] 12:56, 14 November 2011 (UTC) |
||
**Not until they decide exactly what type of alt text is required.--[[User:Sturmvogel 66|Sturmvogel 66]] ([[User talk:Sturmvogel 66|talk]]) 17:40, 14 November 2011 (UTC) |
**Not until they decide exactly what type of alt text is required.--[[User:Sturmvogel 66|Sturmvogel 66]] ([[User talk:Sturmvogel 66|talk]]) 17:40, 14 November 2011 (UTC) |
||
*'''Support''' - Given that I wrote the majority of the ''Kongo''-class articles, I'm hesitant to chime in here (major [[WP:COI]]) but for what it's worth, kudos to Sturm & Co. for more excellent work. [[User:Climie.ca|Cam]] <sup>([[User Talk:Climie.ca|Chat]])([[User:Kirill Lokshin/Professionalism|Prof]])</sup> 20:46, 7 December 2011 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 20:46, 7 December 2011
Battlecruisers of Japan
9 articles
All of the battlecruisers built and designed for Japan. The Kongo class battlecruisers were reconstructed into fast battleships before World War II and are often referred to as battleships. The Amagi class were cancelled due to the Washington Naval Treaty of 1922 and one ship was converted into an aircraft carrier. The B-65 design was never laid down due to World War II. I've only really worked on one of these, but I should be able to fill address any issues brought up during the review. I've structured the topic box deliberately to preserve class integrity.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:38, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
- Support - looks good to me (Disclosure: I worked on Amagi class battlecruiser with Ed and Maralia). Parsecboy (talk) 03:13, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
CommentsSupport
- Some disambiguation links need checking here [1]
- All fixed except air raid which provides the basic definition used as well as dab links.
- Also some references appear to need attention here [2]
- Fixed.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:43, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
otherwise looks good Jim Sweeney (talk) 17:05, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
- Comment: If any topics will be merged upon this topic being promoted, note them here. Should only be one or two, but this way they're caught and handled. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 02:31, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
- Only the Kongo class as you're already aware.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:36, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
- Support - Excellent work as always. - The Bushranger One ping only 04:21, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
- Support - very good work. PMG (talk) 15:11, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
- Comment - Please give all of the images used in the articles alt texts. Some articles, like the Amagi class article, already have alts. Others do not. Sven Manguard Wha? 12:56, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
- Not until they decide exactly what type of alt text is required.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:40, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
- Support - Given that I wrote the majority of the Kongo-class articles, I'm hesitant to chime in here (major WP:COI) but for what it's worth, kudos to Sturm & Co. for more excellent work. Cam (Chat)(Prof) 20:46, 7 December 2011 (UTC)