User talk:202.177.246.3: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 03:02, 2 April 2006

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. android 79 15:21, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Rory096 04:28, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I blocked you permanently and if you don't like it, I could care less. Bye-Bye.--MONGO 10:05, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

UNblock

My answer to your request for an unblock is NO. You can try another adminsitrator, but based on your edits, I won't unblock you. This is a serious effort to build an encyclopedia and is does not have to tolerate the kinds of edits you seem to find to be funny.--MONGO 14:21, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

To be fair, the maximum block length for a static IP is one month. I've reduced the block accordingly. android 79 14:26, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User comments to me via email...

Dear Sir, Ive taken the issue up with another administrator who has brought down the block to only 30 days.But I plan on taking my case to higher authorities till my block is reduced further.Just to follow protocol I invite you accept my apology and resolve this issue before it is reffered to other admimistrators. Yours Faithfully, PS-Im refferring to you as "sir" because I saw your photo on your talk page and you must be atleast twice my age I'm a teenager.

I don't respond to threats...your block of one month is the minimal I should say that you deserve, son. I can see nothing based on your edits that suggest you have any intention of benefitting Wikipedia. Take the time to figure out how you will will become a benefit.--MONGO 20:56, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As for "taking the issue" up with me, no, no "taking up" was done. I merely saw this block notice on my watchlist, and reduced the block fron indefinite to one month, according to the blocking policy, which only allows blocks of up to one month for IP editors. I don't even know what Mongo blocked this IP for; I trust his judgment that the IP ought to be blocked for the maximum allowable time. android 79 20:59, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I shouldn't have blocked indefinitely...the one month is within policy. A screen of the contributions history [1] and particularily this edit summary and "comment" set me off. Regardless, he/she has asked me repeatedly to unblocka dn has formally apologized to me in email so I'm going to unblock. If even one instance of this kind of abusive useless editing recommences, the block will be reinstated.--MONGO 05:42, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked again

You have been blocked in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating policy against repeated behavior after previous blocks. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list.

Note to sysops: Unblocking yourself should almost never be done. If you disagree with the block, contact another administrator.

Also, please stop making provocative edits such as [2] and [3] after the block is over. BCorr|Брайен 16:48, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: ?

Why dont you specify your gender?In your userbox you say any gender pronoun may apply to you.That doesnt make sense unless....ur u know....quee....ga....a fa...a hom...... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.177.246.3 (talk • contribs)

I did specify my gender at one point, but I removed {{User male}} when I was downsizing my userboxbox. {{User pronoun:comfort}} is a statement that I would not be offended if you referred to me as "he", "she", "xie", or whatever "makes you feel comfortable;" I am male, but I have no interest in grammatical masculinity. There are exceptions, as using feminine pronouns as a personal attack would somewhat annoy me.

Yes, I am "quee...", "ga...", "a fa...", or "a hom..." (pick whatever term makes you feel comfortable), but I don't see a direct connection between this and my sex or gender identity. —Guan aco 17:13, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Again you have been blocked, this time for a week...can you guess why? It shouldn't be hard. I request any adimin who is contacted about my block to contact me and I will detail the evidence. Suffice it to say that the next time I have to block this account, it will be permanently.--MONGO 19:26, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked Permanently: Static IP of blocked user

Same editor as Prasi90 (talk · contribs) --MONGO 15:38, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocking

I'm taking a chance and unblocking you. Please follow Wikipedia policies and try to be less aggressive.

Thanks, BCorr|Брайен 11:54, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

One wrong move, and I'll permanban you...I promise!--MONGO 12:58, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

unblock

My IP and username Prasi90 have been indefinitely blocked by MONGO.I havent even edited for more than 3-4 days now.MONGO had earlier asked me to take the matter to RFAR.I could not find the time to do this earlier.Later even without taking the matter to RFAR,MONGO blocked me.Please help.

You're username is blocked indefinitely...your IP is blocked for 30 days (on or about April 28, 2006). When your IP block expires, you can create a new username.--MONGO 13:57, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm removing the unblock boilerplate. This "editor" is the same as Prasi90 (talk · contribs) and has an ongoing Rfc at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Prasi90. There is a comment at the end of the Rfc in which I state that anyone that unblocks this IP or Prasi90 account will then have the responsibility of ensuring that the ongoing incivilities, harassment and vandalism are adequately dealt with, as I am washing my hands of the situation.--MONGO 14:14, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The following is a letter of apology posted by me on MONGO's talk page expressing my regret at past actions and my willingness to change.MONGO has blocked me even after I added this message to his talk page.As can be seen Prasi90 is my user ID.I am adding an unblock template here to attract the attention of MONGO and other administrators.Please remove the said template if I was wrong in adding it I have as you can see been unblocked by NSLE who however wants me to take the matter up with WP:RFAR.However,as I told him,I do not want to get into any more conflicts with you.I am sorry if I offended you via my e-mails or my comments on your English.I am also sorry for insulting Americans.I hope you will accept this apology.I have no desire to have any animosity with you.I will refrain from indulging in trolling-however I request you to please stop blocking me repeatedly for trivial issues.It is my wish that we can both bury the hatchet and move on since the constant arguements between us are pointless.Once again,I am sorry if I have offended you.User:Prasi90 11:37, 21 March 2006 (UTC)