Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Captain SNES (3rd nomination): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
** '''Comment''' I feel that Topwebcomics, the top site list that Captain SNES is on, has taken measures to prevent ballot stuffing. I voted today, as I am a fan of Captain SNES, then cleared my cookies and any other evidence that I could that I had voted, then tried to vote again. It did not let me, because the site logs individual IP addresses for ballot stuffing, thus preventing rabid fans from boosting their own sites to the top.--[[User:Experimentmonty|Experimentmonty]] 01:19, 2 April 2006 (UTC) |
** '''Comment''' I feel that Topwebcomics, the top site list that Captain SNES is on, has taken measures to prevent ballot stuffing. I voted today, as I am a fan of Captain SNES, then cleared my cookies and any other evidence that I could that I had voted, then tried to vote again. It did not let me, because the site logs individual IP addresses for ballot stuffing, thus preventing rabid fans from boosting their own sites to the top.--[[User:Experimentmonty|Experimentmonty]] 01:19, 2 April 2006 (UTC) |
||
* '''Preserve''' I feel that this article should be kept provided that the article be expanded upon. It is not up to the high standards expected here yet, but it has not been given much time to reach these high standards. This is a high quality comic, and given the chance, this article can be benificial.--[[User:Experimentmonty|Experimentmonty]] 01:19, 2 April 2006 (UTC) |
* '''Preserve''' I feel that this article should be kept provided that the article be expanded upon. It is not up to the high standards expected here yet, but it has not been given much time to reach these high standards. This is a high quality comic, and given the chance, this article can be benificial.--[[User:Experimentmonty|Experimentmonty]] 01:19, 2 April 2006 (UTC) |
||
* It's not like real websites don't acknowledge this as you have stated. 8-bit, and Zelda Comic both have links to it. [[User:24.93.102.41|24.93.102.41]] |
|||
Revision as of 23:31, 3 April 2006
|
ATTENTION!
If you came to this page because a friend asked you to do so, or because you saw a message on an online forum asking you to do so, please note that this is not a vote on whether or not this article is to be deleted. It is not true that everyone who shows up to a deletion discussion gets an automatic vote just for showing up. The deletion process is designed to determine the consensus of opinion of Wikipedia editors; for this reason comments from users whose histories do not show experience with or contributions to Wikipedia are traditionally given less weight and may be discounted entirely. You are not barred from participating in the discussion, no matter how new you may be, and we welcome reasoned opinions and rational discussion based upon our policies and guidelines. However, ballot stuffing is pointless. There is no ballot to stuff. This is not a vote, and decisions are not made upon weight of numbers alone. Please review Wikipedia:Deletion policy for more information. |
This sprite comic has had two previous AfDs: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Captain SNES: The Game Masta and Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Captain SNES. Both resulted in a consensus to delete. It's also been speedily deleted at least twice. I considered speedying it again under CSD G4, but the content isn't identical and it was created by a different contributor. In any case, it doesn't look like it meets WP:WEB, and I can't think of any other compelling reason that would make it notable. –Abe Dashiell (t/c) 19:10, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
- This has been listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject Webcomics/Deletion. –Abe Dashiell (t/c) 19:16, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - as above - Hahnchen 01:39, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as before, and for the same reasons. Salt the earth this time. Just zis Guy you know? 14:55, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
- Preserve This comic is notable, with a decent-sized fanbase and a relatively unique plotline. The article needs cleanup and expansion, but CSNES is something important enough to have an article on Wikipedia.Jayofnameless 03:43, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
- Perserve For reasons above. Wutasumi 05:08, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
- Preserve, with the condition that it has to be cleaned up soon It's important enough for an article, but this article isn't all that good.64.72.87.113
- Preserve Same reasons as above. The comic has gained both readership and chapters since the last time the article was deleted, and now meets (or exceeds) the requirements for inclusion, unless those have changed or the person mentioning them on the comic's forums got them wrong. It meets criteria (3) at minimum: TopWebComics (I believe) lists the comic. The proof1 is in the "Vote" link, both on the main page and in several forumites' signatures.
1Fixed typo. Sorry if this note violates some rule, if it does, just delete it. OmegaX123 22:59, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
- Keep Moe ε 02:35, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, doe snot appear to meet WP:WEB. -- Dragonfiend 03:02, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
- Comment If you are going to directly refute a statement made just two spaces above you, you really should say why that is. OmegaX123 stated that from what he can see, it meets requirement three. If you believe that this is not the case, you really should give your reasoning. Also, checking the TopWebComics listings, I found that Captain SNES currently holds slot 47, placing it above Two Lumps in slot 48. 64.72.87.113 03:53, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
- Comment - Generally, topsites don't count at all when looking for verifiability or as indicators of notability. The reason being, is that rabid fans spam votes, and that actual popular sites ignore them. You can have a look at WP:RS at some guidelines refering to sources if you're interested. - Hahnchen 14:19, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
- Comment - The Webcomic List Everything2.com and Comic Alert have all reviewed this comic independantly. OmniRedmage 06:45 1 April 2006
- Comment - Generally, topsites don't count at all when looking for verifiability or as indicators of notability. The reason being, is that rabid fans spam votes, and that actual popular sites ignore them. You can have a look at WP:RS at some guidelines refering to sources if you're interested. - Hahnchen 14:19, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
- Comment Thank you 64.72.etc. This is true, on all counts. OmegaX123 08:05, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
- Keep Captain SNES is a long runing comic with high production values and a long, well thought out plot. to delete it (again.) would be a waste. if Bob and George can have a page, then a much superior comic like Captain SNES certainly deserves one. Omniredmage 05:53 1 April 2006
- Comment The various "top 100 comic" style lists are not generally considered evidence of notability because they are too vulnerable to ballot stuffing. –Abe Dashiell (t/c) 14:15, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
- Comment Look at the article again. At least two of the sites in the links are not topsites (don't know about the third), and have reviewed CSNES. Just like OmniRedmage said, might I add? OmegaX123 20:31, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
- Comment I feel that Topwebcomics, the top site list that Captain SNES is on, has taken measures to prevent ballot stuffing. I voted today, as I am a fan of Captain SNES, then cleared my cookies and any other evidence that I could that I had voted, then tried to vote again. It did not let me, because the site logs individual IP addresses for ballot stuffing, thus preventing rabid fans from boosting their own sites to the top.--Experimentmonty 01:19, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
- Preserve I feel that this article should be kept provided that the article be expanded upon. It is not up to the high standards expected here yet, but it has not been given much time to reach these high standards. This is a high quality comic, and given the chance, this article can be benificial.--Experimentmonty 01:19, 2 April 2006 (UTC)