Jump to content

Talk:Juliet Simms: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 11: Line 11:


Rather than revert the removal of picture again, I'm asking for evidence that it is not free to use. When I click on the picture I'm taken to its page, which indicates that it is licensed for use in the various Wikimedia sites. Can the IP who has removed it twice please explain? [[User:Beeswaxcandle|Beeswaxcandle]] ([[User talk:Beeswaxcandle|talk]]) 05:44, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
Rather than revert the removal of picture again, I'm asking for evidence that it is not free to use. When I click on the picture I'm taken to its page, which indicates that it is licensed for use in the various Wikimedia sites. Can the IP who has removed it twice please explain? [[User:Beeswaxcandle|Beeswaxcandle]] ([[User talk:Beeswaxcandle|talk]]) 05:44, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

== Non-admin closure ==

What a ridiculous decision to close and to keep it. The discussion was still active and was tending to a redirect rather then keep. This s***y decision is challenged at Wikipedia:Deletion review. [[User:Night of the Big Wind|<font face="Old English Text MT"><font color="green">Night of the Big Wind</font></font>]] [[User talk:Night of the Big Wind|<font color="maroon"><sub><i>talk</i></sub></font>]] 03:48, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:48, 7 January 2012

WikiProject iconBiography Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Claim that picture is not free

Rather than revert the removal of picture again, I'm asking for evidence that it is not free to use. When I click on the picture I'm taken to its page, which indicates that it is licensed for use in the various Wikimedia sites. Can the IP who has removed it twice please explain? Beeswaxcandle (talk) 05:44, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Non-admin closure

What a ridiculous decision to close and to keep it. The discussion was still active and was tending to a redirect rather then keep. This s***y decision is challenged at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Night of the Big Wind talk 03:48, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]