Talk:Juliet Simms: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juliet Simms closed as keep |
The Banner (talk | contribs) →Non-admin closure: new section |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Rather than revert the removal of picture again, I'm asking for evidence that it is not free to use. When I click on the picture I'm taken to its page, which indicates that it is licensed for use in the various Wikimedia sites. Can the IP who has removed it twice please explain? [[User:Beeswaxcandle|Beeswaxcandle]] ([[User talk:Beeswaxcandle|talk]]) 05:44, 9 March 2010 (UTC) |
Rather than revert the removal of picture again, I'm asking for evidence that it is not free to use. When I click on the picture I'm taken to its page, which indicates that it is licensed for use in the various Wikimedia sites. Can the IP who has removed it twice please explain? [[User:Beeswaxcandle|Beeswaxcandle]] ([[User talk:Beeswaxcandle|talk]]) 05:44, 9 March 2010 (UTC) |
||
== Non-admin closure == |
|||
What a ridiculous decision to close and to keep it. The discussion was still active and was tending to a redirect rather then keep. This s***y decision is challenged at Wikipedia:Deletion review. [[User:Night of the Big Wind|<font face="Old English Text MT"><font color="green">Night of the Big Wind</font></font>]] [[User talk:Night of the Big Wind|<font color="maroon"><sub><i>talk</i></sub></font>]] 03:48, 7 January 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:48, 7 January 2012
This article was nominated for deletion on 28 December 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
Biography Unassessed | |||||||
|
Claim that picture is not free
Rather than revert the removal of picture again, I'm asking for evidence that it is not free to use. When I click on the picture I'm taken to its page, which indicates that it is licensed for use in the various Wikimedia sites. Can the IP who has removed it twice please explain? Beeswaxcandle (talk) 05:44, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
Non-admin closure
What a ridiculous decision to close and to keep it. The discussion was still active and was tending to a redirect rather then keep. This s***y decision is challenged at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Night of the Big Wind talk 03:48, 7 January 2012 (UTC)