Talk:Nanban (2012 film): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 12:34, 7 January 2012

Film: Indian Start‑class

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

India: Cinema Unassessed

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup.

Name Changes

Why is the name of the film being changed constantly? ie Namban to Moovar (a re-direct to Namban. This is why wp:Crystal Ball articles are a pain. And no refereneces, this article should probably be deleted! - 220.101 talk^\Contribs 15:53, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Budget

Found many sites citing the budget of the film as 60 crores.

kollyinsider.com
way2sms and may more. Is this the actual budget or fake one? Karthik Nadar (talk) 13:45, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If we get any contradicting sources, we can change it. Till then, it seems all right. Secret of success ^{Talk to me} 11:29, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nanbanshoot.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Nanbanshoot.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations

What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 03:37, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 1 January 2012

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

DATE OF RELEASE HAS BEEN 12TH JANUARY 2012 PUBLISHED IN DAILY NEWSPAPER ON 01-01-2012 Jeeva bharathi (talk) 06:56, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. This source says it will release on Thai Pongal, which is the 14th or 15th this year. — Bility (talk) 03:57, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Release date updated with proper sources.WikiMan88 (talk) 07:26, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 2 January 2012

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

vijay was shakar's first choice for nanban,,,,,,,surya was the second choice. You can refer any websites.. http://www.supergoodmovies.com/12266/tollywood/why-is-suriya-out-of-nanban-3-idiots-remake-news-details (check the last para) http://www.sify.com/movies/how-vijay-came-back-to-3-idiots-news-tamil-lb5kpcfijbg.html http://www.sify.com/movies/scoop-vijay-out-of-3-idiots-news-tamil-kmekahefbie.html http://behindwoods.com/tamil-movie-news-1/jan-11-04/vijay-suriya-27-01-11.html Kindly change that wrong information

117.206.50.208 (talk) 06:41, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proper edit made.All Izz Well!!! WikiMan88 (talk) 07:15, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 2 January 2012

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

.

117.206.49.192 (talk) 16:04, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a specific place you want to add a .?--Jac16888 ^Talk 16:07, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 3 January 2012

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

pls put another poster

117.213.53.9 (talk) 15:08, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Poster updated.WikiMan88 (talk) 15:43, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 5 January 2012

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

vijay was shakar's first choice for nanban,,,,,,,surya was the second choice. You can refer any websites.. http://www.supergoodmovies.com/12266/tollywood/why-is-suriya-out-of-nanban-3-idiots-remake-news-details (check the last para) http://www.sify.com/movies/how-vijay-came-back-to-3-idiots-news-tamil-lb5kpcfijbg.html http://www.sify.com/movies/scoop-vijay-out-of-3-idiots-news-tamil-kmekahefbie.html http://behindwoods.com/tamil-movie-news-1/jan-11-04/vijay-suriya-27-01-11.html Kindly change that wrong information

117.206.50.198 (talk) 12:07, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not done What "wrong information"? Please clarify what needs to be changed and indicate why your request is necessary --Bryce (talk | contribs) 13:21, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 5 January 2012

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

you hav written that inital reports sujjested that surya was the front runner for 3 idiots remake....that's absolutely wwrong vijay was shakar's first choice for nanban,,,,,,,surya was the second choice. You can refer any websites.. http://www.supergoodmovies.com/12266/tollywood/why-is-suriya-out-of-nanban-3-idiots-remake-news-details (check the last para) http://www.sify.com/movies/how-vijay-came-back-to-3-idiots-news-tamil-lb5kpcfijbg.html http://www.sify.com/movies/scoop-vijay-out-of-3-idiots-news-tamil-kmekahefbie.html http://behindwoods.com/tamil-movie-news-1/jan-11-04/vijay-suriya-27-01-11.html Kindly change that wrong information. 117.213.48.111 (talk) 17:40, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: None of the site mentions that Vijay was the first runner, but TOI clearly mentions that the first tunner was Surya. -- Karthik Nadar 11:07, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Owe an apology. The info were actually right. Keep up the spirit. -- Karthik Nadar 14:40, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 6 January 2012

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Those sites clearly mentiones that vijay was the front runner and surya was the second choice..Gemini film circuits initially signed up with vijay for the remake of 3 idiots..later he walked out due to some reasons,,then surya was the next choice.. see this http://www.sify.com/movies/how-vijay-came-back-to-3-idiots-news-tamil-lb5kpcfijbg.html

Or see this.....jst see the last paragraph .. Vijay, who were the first choice of 3 Idiots remake, have walked out of it due to various reasons. Then the makers thought of remaking it with Surya in both the languages. http://www.supergoodmovies.com/12266/tollywood/why-is-suriya-out-of-nanban-3-idiots-remake-news-details

117.206.61.49 (talk) 13:44, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done: Good work. -- Karthik Nadar 14:38, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Times of India article is from 8 January 2010, and says that Suriya was the very first person considered for the lead role, but he immediately declined. (Please note, nowhere it is mentioned that Suriya actually was signed for the film, he never was part of the film, he was just considered for the role!) Vijay then was signed and left it by December 2010. Suriya was again considered for the role, before Vijay "came back" (as Sify cites!) in January 2011. Everything absolutely correct! Johannes003 (talk) 16:07, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And please note another point: When Suriya was considered first for the role in January 2010, neither Gemini Film Circuit nor Shankar were part of the project. Vijay was only signed after Shankar was confirmed as the director and GFC confirmed as the production studio! Doubts clear? Johannes003 (talk) 16:12, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Still a lot confused, though looks true. -- Karthik Nadar 16:19, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 7 January 2012

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

.. 117.206.48.234 (talk) 07:42, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That article was completely wrong.Even vijay had said in many interviews that he want to act in the remake of 3 idiots and is in the plan of remaking it.Only one article says that suriya was the front runner.Then only gemini film circuits signed up with shankar and vijay for the remake of 3 idiots.Surya was not any part of the film.No other website says that surya was the front runner.You are absolutely wrong.kindly change this wrong information.

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. --Bryce (talk | contribs) 07:57, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 7 January 2012

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2010-12-05/news-interviews/28224406_1_vijay-film-latest-buzz http://www.southdreamz.com/2010/07/vijays-next-movies-with-seeman-lingusamy-shankar-vikaram-k-kumar.html http://www.tamilnow.com/magazine/vijay-with-3-idiots-377.html jst see these websites..surya was not a part of project

117.206.48.234 (talk) 08:00, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

vijay was shakar's first choice for nanban,,,,,,,surya was the second choice. You can refer any websites.. http://www.supergoodmovies.com/12266/tollywood/why-is-suriya-out-of-nanban-3-idiots-remake-news-details (check the last para) http://www.sify.com/movies/how-vijay-came-back-to-3-idiots-news-tamil-lb5kpcfijbg.html http://www.sify.com/movies/scoop-vijay-out-of-3-idiots-news-tamil-kmekahefbie.html http://behindwoods.com/tamil-movie-news-1/jan-11-04/vijay-suriya-27-01-11.html Kindly change that wrong information 117.206.50.198

117.206.48.234 (talk) 08:01, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Already done Please stop making multiple requests after the first one has been already marked as done. Thank you. --Bryce (talk | contribs) 08:13, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing is done..you havnt changed it so far?????????????

Edit request on 7 January 2012

It is requested that an edit be made to the semi-protected article at Nanban (2012 film). (edit · history · last · links · protection log)

This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".

The edit may be made by any autoconfirmed user. Remember to change the |answered=no parameter to "yes" when the request has been accepted, rejected or on hold awaiting user input. This is so that inactive or completed requests don't needlessly fill up the edit requests category. You may also wish to use the {{ESp}} template in the response. To request that a page be protected or unprotected, make a protection request.

. 117.206.48.234 (talk) 09:56, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 7 January 2012

It is requested that an edit be made to the semi-protected article at Nanban (2012 film). (edit · history · last · links · protection log)

This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".

The edit may be made by any autoconfirmed user. Remember to change the |answered=no parameter to "yes" when the request has been accepted, rejected or on hold awaiting user input. This is so that inactive or completed requests don't needlessly fill up the edit requests category. You may also wish to use the {{ESp}} template in the response. To request that a page be protected or unprotected, make a protection request.

. 117.206.48.234 (talk) 12:34, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 172: / Line 172: @@
 <!-- End request -->
 [[Special:Contributions/117.206.48.234|117.206.48.234]] ([[User talk:117.206.48.234|talk]]) 09:56, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
+== Edit request on 7 January 2012 ==
+{{edit semi-protected|answered=no}}
+<!-- Begin request -->
+.
+<!-- End request -->
+[[Special:Contributions/117.206.48.234|117.206.48.234]] ([[User talk:117.206.48.234|talk]]) 12:34, 7 January 2012 (UTC)