User talk:John Vandenberg/Archive 14

Orphaned non-free image File:Montreal 24heures 01 11 mars 2005.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Montreal 24heures 01 11 mars 2005.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:43, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Y Done Unorphaned. John Vandenberg ^(chat) 21:58, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Hello, John Vandenberg. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.— Qwyrxian (talk) 23:45, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

replied. John Vandenberg ^(chat) 00:33, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

banned user?

John, I left a question regarding a potential banned user on your archived talk page. If you could help clarify the situation there, it would be greatly appreciated.-Scientryst (talk) 17:43, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

I'll answer that today, as best I can. John Vandenberg ^(chat) 22:32, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Replied. John Vandenberg ^(chat) 21:48, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Women's sport

Hello if women's sports fascinate you: WikiProject Women's sport and Portal:Women's sport, --Cordialement féministe ♀ Cordially feminist Geneviève (talk) 00:11, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Betacommand 3 needs your votes

You are listed as an active Arbitrator in the Betacommand 3 case, but you have yet to vote on any remedies. I understand that you may be busy with other concurrent cases, but at this point a wide spectrum of remedies have been put up for consideration. ASCIIn2Bme (talk) 08:12, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to everyone who - whatever their opinion - contributed to the discussion about Wikipedia and SOPA. Thank you for being a part of the discussion. Presented by the Wikimedia Foundation.

A kitten for you!

For all the work you selflessly do for Wikimedia Australia, the GLAM movement in our country, the programming work you do related to supporting this work, the personal money you put into supporting this, your support at RecentChangesCamp, etc. I really appreciate the fantastic work you do and I apologise for my own curve balls and making it more difficult. Seriously, you do fantastic work and don't get the appreciation you so richly deserve.

LauraHale (talk) 06:58, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks Laura, and thanks for the 200% effort you've put in thus far. John Vandenberg ^(chat) 07:53, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

User:Hammersoft/Δ vitae

I expanded, ordered and sorted, and posted a link to this page from the evidence page, per your request. --Hammersoft (talk) 20:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Much appreciated. John Vandenberg ^(chat) 00:51, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Fæ

A request for comments has been opened on administrator User:Fæ. You are being notified due to your prior participation in ANI, RfA, or RfC discussions regarding this user. Thank you, MadmanBot (talk) 19:38, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

I've asked a question of you here. Thanks. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 16:32, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

I just came to alert to this as well, but I see D.C. has already done so. CycloneGU (talk) 16:34, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

 Done. Back to bed for me. John Vandenberg ^(chat) 17:58, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

John, a question for you: it looks like the message above has been spammed to a very large number of people by MadmanBot (though I don't know who initiated it). How can this possibly be appropriate given that it looks like a very blatant example of WP:Canvassing? Prioryman (talk) 18:38, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

See Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_comment/Fæ#Of_note and BOTREQ. MBisanz ^talk 20:06, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

179 people?! That makes me very uneasy. The phrase "piling on" comes to mind, frankly. Prioryman (talk) 00:24, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Simon Kidd

{{you've got mail}} Simon Kidd 2012-01-29T23:55:51‎

Orphaned non-free image File:Andes U.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Andes U.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 19:35, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Who said what to whom and when

You may wish to take a look at Balloonman's statements on Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Fæ, particularly here. I believe they are misrepresenting your words and actions, but facts don't seem to figure very strongly in the discussion around this subject anyway. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 13:00, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

John is back editing, but I don't see any "who said what". 109.151.136.180 (talk) 15:06, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

My message was more of a courtesy to John, not a request for him to participate. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 15:59, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Hello, John Vandenberg. You have new messages at SemblaceII's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.