User talk:Zenkai251: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 21:02, 1 March 2012

Goodbye everyone :( Zenkai _talk 20:58, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for sockpuppetry, for which you have previously been blocked. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 17:10, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zenkai251 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

How am I being accused of sockpuppetry? My IP address has been blocked. I was blocked due to sockpuppetry in the past, but that was before I knew anything about wikipedia's policies. I have learned the policies now, and I try to follow them as best I can. Also, there is no evidence that I was using a sockpuppet. I'm suprised at how hastily I was banned. So can you please remove this block? Regards. Zenkai _talk 18:25, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. I've verified the checkuser findings; there is no ambiguity. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 23:48, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zenkai251 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is quite absurd. The only "evidence" of this accusation is that someone commented on a discussion that I was apart of. So, if we go by that, seb az, noformation, lisa, and many others are also my sockpuppets. The only fair thing to do is to unban me. Regards Zenkai _talk 20:21, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You've been told already that there's technical evidence, denying it won't help. Max Semenik (talk) 20:41, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 Goodbye everyone :( [[User:Zenkai251|<font face="Old English Text MT"><font color="green">Zenkai</font></font>]] [[User talk:Zenkai251|<font color="grey"><sub><i>talk</i></sub></font>]] 20:58, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
-==[[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry|Sockpuppetry]] case==
-{| align="left" style="background: transparent;"
-|| [[File:Puppeter template.svg|35px]]
-|}
-Your name has been mentioned in connection with a [[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry|sockpuppetry]] case. Please refer to [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Zenkai251]] for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|the guide to responding to cases]] before editing the evidence page. [[User:SudoGhost|Sudo]][[User_talk:SudoGhost#top|Ghost]] 16:59, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
-<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola.svg|40px|left|alt=|link=]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' '''indefinitely''' from editing for sockpuppetry, for which you have previously been blocked.   If you would like to be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}, but you should read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first. [[User:Favonian|Favonian]] ([[User talk:Favonian|talk]]) 17:10, 29 February 2012 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-blockindef -->
-{{unblock reviewed|reason=How am I being accused of sockpuppetry? My IP address has been blocked. I was blocked due to sockpuppetry in the past, but that was before I knew anything about wikipedia's policies. I have learned the policies now, and I try to follow them as best I can. Also, there is no evidence that I was using a sockpuppet. I'm suprised at how hastily I was banned. So can you please remove this block? Regards. [[User:Zenkai251|<font face="Old English Text MT"><font color="green">Zenkai</font></font>]] [[User talk:Zenkai251|<font color="grey"><sub><i>talk</i></sub></font>]] 18:25, 29 February 2012 (UTC)|decline=Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. I've verified the checkuser findings; there is no ambiguity. --[[User:Jpgordon|jpgordon]]<sup><small>[[User talk:Jpgordon|::==( o )]]</small></sup> 23:48, 29 February 2012 (UTC)}}
-There's no evidence?  You do realize that there are a class of [[WP:CHECKUSER|users]] who can check technical data right?  [[User:Noformation|<font color="black">N</font><sup><font color="red">o</font></sup><font color="black">f</font><font color="red">o</font><font color="black">rmation</font>]] <font color="black"><sup>[[User talk:Noformation|Talk]]</sup></font> 20:48, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
-:Hello, can you show me the "evidence"? All that I have seen is completely circumstantial. [[User:Zenkai251|<font face="Old English Text MT"><font color="green">Zenkai</font></font>]] [[User talk:Zenkai251|<font color="grey"><sub><i>talk</i></sub></font>]] 20:41, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
+<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola.svg|40px|left|alt=|link=]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' '''indefinitely''' from editing for sockpuppetry, for which you have previously been blocked.   If you would like to be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}, but you should read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first. [[User:Favonian|Favonian]] ([[User talk:Favonian|talk]]) 17:10, 29 February 2012 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-blockindef -->
+{{unblock reviewed|reason=How am I being accused of sockpuppetry? My IP address has been blocked. I was blocked due to sockpuppetry in the past, but that was before I knew anything about wikipedia's policies. I have learned the policies now, and I try to follow them as best I can. Also, there is no evidence that I was using a sockpuppet. I'm suprised at how hastily I was banned. So can you please remove this block? Regards. [[User:Zenkai251|<font face="Old English Text MT"><font color="green">Zenkai</font></font>]] [[User talk:Zenkai251|<font color="grey"><sub><i>talk</i></sub></font>]] 18:25, 29 February 2012 (UTC)|decline=Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. I've verified the checkuser findings; there is no ambiguity. --[[User:Jpgordon|jpgordon]]<sup><small>[[User talk:Jpgordon|::==( o )]]</small></sup> 23:48, 29 February 2012 (UTC)}}
 {{unblock reviewed|reason=This is quite absurd. The only "evidence" of this accusation is that someone commented on a discussion that I was apart of. So, if we go by that, seb az, noformation, lisa, and many others are also my sockpuppets. The only fair thing to do is to unban me. Regards [[User:Zenkai251|<font face="Old English Text MT"><font color="green">Zenkai</font></font>]] [[User talk:Zenkai251|<font color="grey"><sub><i>talk</i></sub></font>]] 20:21, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
 |decline=You've been told already that there's technical evidence, denying it won't help. [[User:MaxSem|Max Semenik]] ([[User talk:MaxSem|talk]]) 20:41, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
 }}
-What "technical evidence"? I have not seen it. [[User:Zenkai251|<font face="Old English Text MT"><font color="green">Zenkai</font></font>]] [[User talk:Zenkai251|<font color="grey"><sub><i>talk</i></sub></font>]] 20:44, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
-:...and you won't. It is satisfactory that the right ones have seen it.<br/><span style="text-shadow:#294 0.1em 0.1em 0.3em; class=texhtml">[[User:Berean Hunter|<font face="High Tower Text" size="1px"><b style="color:#00C">⋙–Ber</b><b style="color:#66f">ean–Hun</b><b style="color:#00C">ter—►</b></font>]]</span> 20:52, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
-::There is none.....that's why I haven't seen it. [[User:Zenkai251|<font face="Old English Text MT"><font color="green">Zenkai</font></font>]] [[User talk:Zenkai251|<font color="grey"><sub><i>talk</i></sub></font>]] 20:53, 1 March 2012 (UTC)