Talk:Lisa Lutz: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 00:00, 30 March 2012

Biography Start‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Lisa Lutz has been nominated for speedy deletion. I believe that this can be remedied by noting:

1. This is the first article I've started on my own; please give me some time to gather my ammunition, and please suggest remedies before you do delete the article!

2. I added a sentence about her notability in the first paragraph

3. I've been reading Wikipedia:Notability_(people), and believe that Lisa Lutz is notable for the following reasons:

Her novels have many reviews available on the internet and in mainstream publications, such as USA Today, People, etc. I have only cited one, but many more are available; should I cite more?
She is listed as a screenwriter on IMDB.com, with her DOB.
She is the author of three, soon to be four, novels
Her first novel was nominated for three "best first" awards
She is the author of several articles in mainstream publications, e.g. Salon, for which references could be provided

3. I have included biographical information from both IMDB.com and her own official website; is this not sufficient? Where should I look for other sources?

4. While biographical information is a bit scanty, I believe that the notability of Lisa Lutz herself is well grounded, as she has authored three novels and been nominated for three prizes. Should the article be subject to deletion when the sources are lacking, but the subject of the article is herself notable?

cojoco (talk) 10:23, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

5. While I don't think it is relevant to the article, "The Spellman Files" reached #27 on the New York Times bestseller lists[1] cojoco (talk) 10:40, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DO NOT DELETE!!

Wikipedia should not delete Lisa Lutz's page! It is a way for her fans to communictae with one-another. Thanks

Dockofusa (talk) 18:07, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Luckily, that danger has passed. cojoco (talk) 21:55, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank God!

FYI Book 4

Book 4 (i don't remember the name) come out March 2010!

Thanks for listening/reading!

Dockofusa (talk) 21:34, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I just saw Lisa Lutz at Kinokuniya in Sydney, tonight, and she said that it's pretty much all written. That's the last one she's contractually obliged to provide, though, so who knows if there will be more? cojoco (talk) 12:15, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nice Looking

She is nice looking.

@@ Line 45: / Line 45: @@
 :I just saw Lisa Lutz at Kinokuniya in Sydney, ''tonight'', and she said that it's pretty much all written.  That's the last one she's contractually obliged to provide, though, so who knows if there will be more? [[User:Cojoco|cojoco]] ([[User talk:Cojoco|talk]]) 12:15, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
+== Nice Looking ==
+She is nice looking.