Talk:Shada (Doctor Who): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 16:19, 1 April 2012

Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Doctor Who C‑class Mid‑importance

	Doctor Who portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Doctor Who, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Doctor Who and its spin-offs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Doctor WhoWikipedia:WikiProject Doctor WhoTemplate:WikiProject Doctor WhoDoctor Who articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Television: Episode coverage C‑class

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Did anyone notice in the webcast when Skagra finds information on the Doctor on his ship it flashes past: Gary, Robbie, Mark, Howard, Jason, the names of Take That?--GingerM 17:26, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

It also has other references like: Pew, Pew, Barney McGrew, Cuthbert, Dibble, Grub and lots more.--GingerM 17:29, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Stub?

I may get my pinkies slapped, but I removed the stub tag. This entry sure seems thorough to me.Konczewski 20:46, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's missing a Plot Summary.Litefoot 06:35, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's missing the original TV version's cast!!Zigwithbag 02:58, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Both problems seem fixed to me, but it still seems somewhat light-weight when compared with other Doctor Who episodes --Antreid (talk) 22:41, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

References

Well, I added a few, but there's plenty of unsubstatiated claims in here. If anyone has the various books and suchlike that it looks like people have read when writing the info in here, please take the trouble to add references where helpful to back up the various statements.--Antreid (talk) 22:41, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Two versions one page?

I was confused by this page and thought there was no cast listing, because in the main section is the cast list of the second remade version. This is somewhat confusing for people who are not diehard wiki makers, on a usability level! I suspect others coming here will often have this problem. Thank you for the reversion, as I didn't want to duplicate data. However: I suggest splitting the page into one for the original version and one for the new version, so the cast listing can go where it belongs, and not confuse visitors to the page looking for the original cast. Richardhod (talk) 04:36, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Updating article

I'm going to start boldly updating this article. Revert if you think there needs to be consensus for anything I update. Of course, I will be adding references for anything that is challenged, or likely to be challenged. I'd like to work with anybody that's seen the 1992 VHS or 2003 webcast, because I haven't and I have a bunch of questions. Thanks. 64.40.61.24 (talk) 15:06, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm formatting the references to WP:LDR to make it easier to work on the article and easier to detail the refs. Everybody is welcome to revert. 64.40.61.24 (talk) 16:19, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 15:07, 1 April 2012 edit 64.40.61.24 (talk) →‎Updateing article: sp ← Previous edit		Revision as of 16:19, 1 April 2012 edit undo 64.40.61.24 (talk) →‎Updating article: ref frmt Next edit →
Line 21:		Line 21:

	I'm going to start [[WP:BOLD\|boldly]] updating this article. Revert if you think there needs to be consensus for anything I update. Of course, I will be adding references for ''anything that is challenged, or likely to be challenged''. I'd like to work with anybody that's seen the 1992 VHS or 2003 webcast, because I haven't and I have a bunch of questions. Thanks. [[Special:Contributions/64.40.61.24\|64.40.61.24]] ([[User talk:64.40.61.24\|talk]]) 15:06, 1 April 2012 (UTC)		I'm going to start [[WP:BOLD\|boldly]] updating this article. Revert if you think there needs to be consensus for anything I update. Of course, I will be adding references for ''anything that is challenged, or likely to be challenged''. I'd like to work with anybody that's seen the 1992 VHS or 2003 webcast, because I haven't and I have a bunch of questions. Thanks. [[Special:Contributions/64.40.61.24\|64.40.61.24]] ([[User talk:64.40.61.24\|talk]]) 15:06, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
			:I'm formatting the references to [[WP:LDR]] to make it easier to work on the article and easier to detail the refs. Everybody is welcome to revert. [[Special:Contributions/64.40.61.24\|64.40.61.24]] ([[User talk:64.40.61.24\|talk]]) 16:19, 1 April 2012 (UTC)