Talk:Evanescence (Evanescence album)

Other songs

Shouldn't the other songs that have been released be included in the article? "Made of Stone" and "The Other Side" can be listened to through certain pages the band added on their website.The Catalyst (talk) 01:01, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

Recording sessions

Amy Lee twitted that the album will be finished on July, 11.77.29.82.96 (talk) 19:23, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Track Listing

Should we start building a track listing? We already know two of the songs - What You Want and The Other Side, and there's going to be another sneak peek released this week, as well as the other song titles mentioned, "Made of Stone" and "Lost in Paradise"

Wait until a track listing actually comes out; otherwise, it's just a random collection of info. — Huntster (t @ c) 22:07, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

I don't think that the 17th song on the Deluxe tracklisting is true : "All this Years". Amy said there are 16 songs. also on iTunes in pre-order there are 16 songs. Source, anybody? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dean64 (talk • contribs) 13:20, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Steve Lillywhite category

What do folks think about this category in the article? How much of the current album can be credited to Lillywhite? My impression was that when they went back into the studio with Raskulinecz, they were doing so from scratch (remember, we're not talking about the songwriting, but the recording aspect). In this case, the category is inappropriate. Opinions? — Huntster (t @ c) 01:12, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

That was my thoughts exactly. I don't think Lillywhite really had much to do at all with this album. But I never removed anything in case my "understanding" was wrong. All current sources point only to the new guy as a producer.. but none really completely discredit Steve, I guess (but why would they?). I agree to the category being inappropriate. ~ [ Scott M. Howard ] ~ [ Talk ]:[ Contribs ] ~ 01:30, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus to move. Vegaswikian (talk) 02:07, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

Evanescence (Evanescence album) → Evanescence (album) – Other two albums of the same name appear far less notable than this one. Evanescence (album) currently redirects here anyway. U-Mos (talk) 22:50, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Support - Originally opposed to this idea, I found that I could come up with no good excuse why this article couldn't simply be named "Evanescence (album)". My argument was that there are three (vs 2) total albums with the same name and that makes determining the album with the most notability somewhat more difficult. But this album clearly is (already) more notable, and will very likely become even more notable in the future. A hatnote should of course be included to point to "Evanescent" (as is already placed on the article). ~ [ Scott M. Howard ] ~ [ Talk ]:[ Contribs ] ~ 23:48, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

• Support: unnecessarily specific parenthetical disambiguation; already redirects. –CWenger (^ • @) 06:28, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
• Oppose both titles are disambiguated, but the current title is unambiguous, whereas the suggested title is not. As we are not moving it to the prime location ("Evanescence"), then the article should have an unambiguous name. 70.24.248.237 (talk) 08:38, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
• Oppose. The article is either the primary topic, or it needs a unique disambiguation. It can't be the primary topic of Evanescence (album), which should currently be redirected to the dab page, as it's ambiguous. Jenks24 (talk) 09:31, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Reviews

Could someone kindly explain the selection criteria for reviews? Why are some reviews included in "Critical reviews" while others from seemingly "comparable" music media sites or magazines are excluded? Gimmetoo (talk) 22:19, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

I haven't looked at what the article has, but here's a list of approved sites: WP:ALBUM/REVSITE ~ [ Scott M. Howard ] ~ [ Talk ]:[ Contribs ] ~ 02:00, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

My immediate concern was the exclusion of Spin while including reviews like "M is for Music" (which is gone at least for now). Gimmetoo (talk) 03:02, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

The "Rolling Stones" review in the reviews section is a review of "What You Want" (the single), not the whole album. ErickAutumn (talk) 22:50, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

More

• http://www.news.com.au/entertainment/music/amy-lee-brings-life-back-to-evanescence/story-e6frfn09-1226305484133 My love is love (talk) 21:40, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Charts

I keep adding the charts 2012 with references but it keeps being deleted for no reason.