Talk:Ivy Bridge (microarchitecture)

List of Ivy Bridge Processors

Comment: I moved this section from the article for now, as it contained some false information.

• The 2011 release dates are obviously wrong
• Some of the processor names are wrong (according to the linked article, there is a "Core i5-3470T", not a "3470")
• The TDP is wrong, according to the linked article
• I don't really trust the other info, given the above errors

Thue | talk 23:29, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

2011 release date probably just an error by the author, it should be 2012. There is a Core i5-3470T(dual core 35W) and also a i5-3470(quad core 77W) so he is not wrong. TDP of 77W is correct, just that the list is not complete. While the info seems to be correct, there is a possible that specs will change before launch.(user:xxxxxls2) 171.207.50.210 (talk) 02:20, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

What is your source for the i5-3470 info? Thue | talk 10:48, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

¹Processors featuring Intel's HD 4000 graphics are set in bold. Other processors feature HD 2500 graphics or no graphics core (Graphics Clock rate indicated by N/A).

Desktop Processors

[CPU World: Rumoured Ivy Bridge processors]

Target segment	Cores (Threads)	Processor Branding & Model		CPU Clock rate		Graphics Clock rate		L3 Cache	TDP	Release Date (Y-M-D)	Price (USD)	Motherboard
				Normal	Turbo	Normal	Turbo					Socket	Interface	Memory
Performance	4 (8)	Core i7	3770K	3.5 GHz	3.9 GHz	650 MHz	1150 MHz	8 MB	77 W	Q2 2011	$	LGA 1155	DMI 2.0 PCIe 3.0^	Up to dual channel DDR3-1600
			3770	3.4 GHz							$
Mainstream	4 (4)	Core i5	3570K	3.4 GHz	3.8 GHz			6 MB			$
			3570	3.4 GHz						Q3 2011	$
			3550	3.3 GHz	3.7 GHz					Q2 2011	$
			3470	3.2 GHz	3.6 GHz		1100 MHz			Q3 2011	$
			3450	3.2 GHz	3.5 GHz					Q2 2011	$
			3330	3.0 GHz	3.2 GHz		1050 MHz			Q3 2011	$

^{^} Requires a 75/77-series Motherboard

Requested move 2011

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 00:23, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

---

Ivy Bridge (computer processor) → Ivy Bridge (microarchitecture) – This is the proper name for computer processor designs.Jasper Deng (talk) 05:49, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 2012

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page not moved. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 16:20, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

---

Ivy Bridge (microarchitecture) → Ivy Bridge – Primary topic. 126,000 views this month plus 2500 from its old title. Ivy Bridge college is currently still in its university's article which has 3000 views this month. Marcus Qwertyus 22:24, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

• Oppose Popularity will decline when the next microarchitecture comes along. —Ruud 22:44, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
• Oppose per Ruud. Who views the Intel Core article when searching for "Core"?Jasper Deng (talk) 22:45, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
• Oppose – no need to claim primary on such an ambiguous term. Dicklyon (talk) 22:53, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Move to Sandy Bridge (same architecture)

I suggest this page is removed into a section in the Sandy Bridge article, as Ivy Bridge is just a die shrink of Sandy Bridge, not a new architecture. This is how it is done on other Wikipedia articles about Intel architectures as well. 83.108.199.200 (talk) 03:10, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

No. It was originally part of that article, and it worked horribly, with each section having two sub-sections (one for Sandy Bridge, one for Ivy Bridge). This is much cleaner. Besides, there are differences enough between the two (see the article) to justify a separate article. Thue | talk 00:12, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

I'm okay with either way. But i see nothing wrong with having two sub-sections. Also, because both are separated, quite a number of stuff are duplicated just to let ivy bridge have a new page. 175.156.205.23 (talk) 02:40, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

You say there is lots of duplicated content - but I can't see any duplicated content? Thue | talk 21:30, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

CPU specification is a duplication, and also sandy bridge has a successor section just because both articles are separated. Other than that, a lot of the titles are repeats. Not as much as i previously thought, but its still a lot. But i'm not against separating anyway, because pages load faster if they are smaller. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.156.193.131 (talk) 12:09, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

My main argument is that a user will usually want to read about either Ivy Bridge OR Sandy Bridge, depending on which specific CPU he wants information on. But not both. In that case it is much cleaner to have the Ivy bridge content separate. Thue | talk 18:40, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

I dont see any problems making the Sandy Bridge article a lot like the Nehalem (microarchitecture) article, where the die shrink of Nehalem, Westmere, is a section. 83.108.199.200 (talk) 18:53, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Out of Date??

Could User Jasper Deng specify which info is out of date? As of what i know, other than details that are already stated here, only info regarding motherboards are revealed/leaked. 175.156.216.71 (talk) 01:02, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Currently the full details are under embargo; Intel has revealed a few details but not the whole deal yet. Suffice it to say it's worth waiting one more month to do a proper cleanup of this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.112.21.178 (talk) 18:34, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Intel_Ivy_Bridge_(microarchitecture) Redirects to Sandy Bridge

When you do a search for "Ivy Bidge", this article is listed followed by a redirect to Sandy Bridge (redirect from Intel Ivy Bridge (microarchitecture)). Think it should be better redirected to this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.5.181.210 (talk) 19:16, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Intel moved Ivy Bridge to April 23

This should be included in the article; cheers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.31.233.11 (talk) 20:48, 13 April 2012 (UTC) I see no indication that ivy bridge shipped on april 23rd. I can't find anyone selling it anywhere.