Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faye Sewell: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
closed as delete
fix
Line 1: Line 1:
===[[Faye Sewell]]===
{{afdt}} '''delete'''. [[User:Ironholds|Ironholds]] ([[User talk:Ironholds|talk]]) 07:02, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
{{afdt}} '''delete'''. [[User:Ironholds|Ironholds]] ([[User talk:Ironholds|talk]]) 07:02, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

===[[Faye Sewell]]===


:{{la|Faye Sewell}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faye Sewell|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 May 30#{{anchorencode:Faye Sewell}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{•}} <span class="plainlinks">[http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Faye_Sewell Stats]</span>)
:{{la|Faye Sewell}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faye Sewell|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 May 30#{{anchorencode:Faye Sewell}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{•}} <span class="plainlinks">[http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Faye_Sewell Stats]</span>)

Revision as of 11:28, 9 June 2012

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was ‎ delete. Ironholds (talk) 07:02, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Faye Sewell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only claim to notability is a role in a film of questionable notability. This is another in a long line of self promotion articles created by a long line of sockpuppets. Ridernyc (talk) 17:40, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Confirmed that creator was a sock, and the article certainly does sound promotional ("she worked as a photographic model, most notably gracing French Vogue"). Google News didn't turn up anything. [1] ~Adjwilley (talk) 22:04, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:20, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.