Amity Shlaes: Difference between revisions
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
She is also a regular contributor to [[Marketplace (radio program)|Marketplace]], the public radio show. She has appeared on numerous other radio and television shows over the course of her career.<ref>{{cite web|title=Amity Shlaes|url=http://www.amityshlaes.com/bio.php|publisher=Amity Shlaes|accessdate=20 April 2012}}</ref> |
She is also a regular contributor to [[Marketplace (radio program)|Marketplace]], the public radio show. She has appeared on numerous other radio and television shows over the course of her career.<ref>{{cite web|title=Amity Shlaes|url=http://www.amityshlaes.com/bio.php|publisher=Amity Shlaes|accessdate=20 April 2012}}</ref> |
||
Prior to writing her column for Bloomberg, Miss Shlaes was a columnist for the ''[[Financial Times]]'' for five years, until September 2005.<ref>{{cite web|title=Our Leadership|url=http://www.bushcenter.com/the-institute/our-leadership|publisher=George W. Bush Institute|accessdate=20 April 2012}}</ref> Before that she was a member of the editorial board of the ''[[Wall Street Journal]]'', specializing in economics |
Prior to writing her column for Bloomberg, Miss Shlaes was a columnist for the ''[[Financial Times]]'' for five years, until September 2005.<ref>{{cite web|title=Our Leadership|url=http://www.bushcenter.com/the-institute/our-leadership|publisher=George W. Bush Institute|accessdate=20 April 2012}}</ref> Before that she was a member of the editorial board of the ''[[Wall Street Journal]]'', specializing in economics,<ref>{{cite web|title=Amity Shlaes|url=http://www.amityshlaes.com/bio.php|publisher=Amity Shlaes|accessdate=20 April 2012}}</ref> though also writing on a range of social issues. Her best known non-economic piece from this period was a 1994 study of rising hostility to outsiders among urban blacks, although this was published in the London [[Spectator]]<ref>http://www.johnderbyshire.com/Opinions/Culture/Extras/KingsOfTheDeal/mischief01.jpg</ref>. She followed the collapse of communism for the ''Wall Street Journal''/Europe and in the early 1990s she served as the Journal's op-ed editor.<ref>{{cite web|title=Amity Shlaes|url=http://www.amityshlaes.com/bio.php|publisher=Amity Shlaes|accessdate=20 April 2012}}</ref> |
||
Over the years, she has written for ''[[The New Yorker]]'', ''[[The American Spectator]]'', ''[[Commentary Magazine]]'', ''[[Foreign Affairs]]'', ''[[Forbes]]'', ''[[National Review]]'', ''[[The New Republic]]'', ''[[the Sueddeutsche Zeitung]]'' and ''[[Die Zeit]]'', among others.<ref>{{cite web|title=Amity Shlaes|url=http://www.amityshlaes.com/bio.php|publisher=Amity Shlaes|accessdate=20 April 2012}}</ref> Her obituary of Milton Friedman appeared in The New York Sun.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.nysun.com/article/43705 |title=Friedman's Warmth - November 17, 2006 - The New York Sun |publisher=Nysun.com |date=2006-11-17 |accessdate=2010-11-20}}</ref> |
Over the years, she has written for ''[[The New Yorker]]'', ''[[The American Spectator]]'', ''[[Commentary Magazine]]'', ''[[Foreign Affairs]]'', ''[[Forbes]]'', ''[[National Review]]'', ''[[The New Republic]]'', ''[[the Sueddeutsche Zeitung]]'' and ''[[Die Zeit]]'', among others.<ref>{{cite web|title=Amity Shlaes|url=http://www.amityshlaes.com/bio.php|publisher=Amity Shlaes|accessdate=20 April 2012}}</ref> Her obituary of Milton Friedman appeared in The New York Sun.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.nysun.com/article/43705 |title=Friedman's Warmth - November 17, 2006 - The New York Sun |publisher=Nysun.com |date=2006-11-17 |accessdate=2010-11-20}}</ref> |
||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
Economist [[Paul Krugman]] has criticized ''The Forgotten Man''. He has taken issue with its central tenet that [[New Deal]] policies exacerbated the Great Depression. Krugman wrote of "a whole intellectual industry, mainly operating out of right-wing think tanks, devoted to propagating the idea that FDR actually made the Depression worse.... But the definitive study of fiscal policy in the 1930s, by the [[MIT]] economist E. Cary Brown, reached a very different conclusion: Fiscal stimulus was unsuccessful 'not because it does not work, but because it was not tried'."<ref>{{cite news|last=Krugman|first=Paul|title=Franklin Delano Obama?|url=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/10/opinion/10krugman.html?_r=2&adxnnl=1&adxnnlx=1333638004-dRL5O3XXh14bXVJq3+bZZA|accessdate=20 April 2012|newspaper=New York Times|date=10 November 2012}}</ref> |
Economist [[Paul Krugman]] has criticized ''The Forgotten Man''. He has taken issue with its central tenet that [[New Deal]] policies exacerbated the Great Depression. Krugman wrote of "a whole intellectual industry, mainly operating out of right-wing think tanks, devoted to propagating the idea that FDR actually made the Depression worse.... But the definitive study of fiscal policy in the 1930s, by the [[MIT]] economist E. Cary Brown, reached a very different conclusion: Fiscal stimulus was unsuccessful 'not because it does not work, but because it was not tried'."<ref>{{cite news|last=Krugman|first=Paul|title=Franklin Delano Obama?|url=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/10/opinion/10krugman.html?_r=2&adxnnl=1&adxnnlx=1333638004-dRL5O3XXh14bXVJq3+bZZA|accessdate=20 April 2012|newspaper=New York Times|date=10 November 2012}}</ref> |
||
Krugman |
Krugman claimed Shlaes was disseminating "misleading statistics."<ref>{{cite news|last=Krugman|first=Paul|title=Amity Shlaes strikes again|url=http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/11/19/amity-shlaes-strikes-again/|accessdate=20 April 2012|newspaper=New York Times|date=19 November 2008}}</ref> Shlaes responded to Krugman in the ''Wall Street Journal'', specifically saying that for her estimates of employment and unemployment during the period she used the Lebergott/Bureau of Labor Statistics series.<ref>{{cite news|last=Shlaes|first=Amity|title=The Krugman Recipe for Depression|url=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122792327402265913.html|accessdate=20 April 2012|newspaper=Wall Street Journal|date=29 November 2008}}</ref> She explained that statistician Stanley Lebergott "intentionally did not include temporary jobs in emergency programs -- because to count a short-term, make-work project as a real job was to mask the anxiety of one who really didn't have regular work with long-term prospects."<ref>{{cite news|last=Shlaes|first=Amity|title=The Krugman Recipe for Depression|url=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122792327402265913.html|accessdate=20 April 2012|newspaper=Wall Street Journal|date=29 November 2008}}</ref> |
||
Shlaes went on to say that if the [[Obama administration]] "proposes F.D.R.-style recovery programs, then it is useful to establish whether those original programs actually brought recovery. The answer is, they didn’t."<ref>{{cite news|last=Schuessler|first=Jennifer|title=Inside the List|url=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/14/books/review/InsideList-t.html?ref=review|accessdate=20 April 2012|newspaper=New York Times|date=12 December 2012}}</ref> |
Shlaes went on to say that if the [[Obama administration]] "proposes F.D.R.-style recovery programs, then it is useful to establish whether those original programs actually brought recovery. The answer is, they didn’t."<ref>{{cite news|last=Schuessler|first=Jennifer|title=Inside the List|url=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/14/books/review/InsideList-t.html?ref=review|accessdate=20 April 2012|newspaper=New York Times|date=12 December 2012}}</ref> |
||
Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
Writing in ''Forbes'', [[Hudson Institute]] fellow Diana Furchtgott-Roth first lays out Shlaes's view: "She points out that federal spending during the New Deal did not restore economic health.<ref>{{cite news|last=Furchtgott-Roth|first=Diana|title=The Economic Fight Of The Year|url=http://www.forbes.com/2008/12/03/new-deal-debate-oped-cx_df_1203furchtgottroth.html|accessdate=20 April 2012|newspaper=Forbes|date=03 December 2008}}</ref> Unemployment stayed high and the Dow Jones Industrial average stayed low." After then explaining Krugman's position that "the New Deal failed to spend enough money to achieve full employment," Furchtgott-Roth concludes that "the new president needs to listen to many voices."<ref>{{cite news|last=Furchtgott-Roth|first=Diana|title=The Economic Fight Of The Year|url=http://www.forbes.com/2008/12/03/new-deal-debate-oped-cx_df_1203furchtgottroth.html|accessdate=20 April 2012|newspaper=Forbes|date=03 December 2008}}</ref> |
Writing in ''Forbes'', [[Hudson Institute]] fellow Diana Furchtgott-Roth first lays out Shlaes's view: "She points out that federal spending during the New Deal did not restore economic health.<ref>{{cite news|last=Furchtgott-Roth|first=Diana|title=The Economic Fight Of The Year|url=http://www.forbes.com/2008/12/03/new-deal-debate-oped-cx_df_1203furchtgottroth.html|accessdate=20 April 2012|newspaper=Forbes|date=03 December 2008}}</ref> Unemployment stayed high and the Dow Jones Industrial average stayed low." After then explaining Krugman's position that "the New Deal failed to spend enough money to achieve full employment," Furchtgott-Roth concludes that "the new president needs to listen to many voices."<ref>{{cite news|last=Furchtgott-Roth|first=Diana|title=The Economic Fight Of The Year|url=http://www.forbes.com/2008/12/03/new-deal-debate-oped-cx_df_1203furchtgottroth.html|accessdate=20 April 2012|newspaper=Forbes|date=03 December 2008}}</ref> |
||
Krugman supporter Jonathan Chait has called the book self-contradictory, misleading, and inaccurate.<ref>{{cite news|last=Chait|first=Jonathan|title=Wasting Away In Hooverville|url=http://www.tnr.com/article/books/wasting-away-hooverville|accessdate=20 April 2012|newspaper=The New Republic|date=18 March 2009}}</ref> Novelist and essayist [[John Updike]], a long-time FDR fan, criticized the book as "a revisionist history of the Depression."<ref>{{cite news|last=Updike|first=John|title=Laissez-faire Is More|url=http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/books/2007/07/02/070702crbo_books_updike|accessdate=20 April 2012|newspaper=The New Yorker|date=2 July 2007}}</ref> |
|||
The ''[[International Herald Tribune]]'' review by [[David Leonhardt]] comments: "With 75 years of hindsight, surely we can all agree that Roosevelt’s vision was imperfect. Yes, he helped build many pillars of the modern economy — [[Social Security]], the Securities and Exchange Commission, the modern [[Federal Reserve]] and more. He also understood the folly of Hoover’s protectionism and pursued a more open trade policy. And his public works slowly, if unevenly, provided employment. (As the historian Eric Rauchway has noted in Slate, Shlaes exaggerates joblessness in the 1930s by counting many people who worked in relief programs as unemployed.) But other attempts to fine-tune the economy truly did fail. From today’s vantage point, the worst of them may have been farm subsidies, which essentially live on, giving a handout to agribusiness while raising the cost of food for everyone else and hurting poor farmers around the world."<ref>{{cite news|last=Leonhardt|first=David|title=No Free Lunch|url=http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/26/books/review/Leonhardt-t.html?scp=2&sq=shlaes&st=cse|accessdate=20 April 2012|newspaper=New York Times|date=26 August 2007}}</ref> |
The ''[[International Herald Tribune]]'' review by [[David Leonhardt]] comments: "With 75 years of hindsight, surely we can all agree that Roosevelt’s vision was imperfect. Yes, he helped build many pillars of the modern economy — [[Social Security]], the Securities and Exchange Commission, the modern [[Federal Reserve]] and more. He also understood the folly of Hoover’s protectionism and pursued a more open trade policy. And his public works slowly, if unevenly, provided employment. (As the historian Eric Rauchway has noted in Slate, Shlaes exaggerates joblessness in the 1930s by counting many people who worked in relief programs as unemployed.) But other attempts to fine-tune the economy truly did fail. From today’s vantage point, the worst of them may have been farm subsidies, which essentially live on, giving a handout to agribusiness while raising the cost of food for everyone else and hurting poor farmers around the world."<ref>{{cite news|last=Leonhardt|first=David|title=No Free Lunch|url=http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/26/books/review/Leonhardt-t.html?scp=2&sq=shlaes&st=cse|accessdate=20 April 2012|newspaper=New York Times|date=26 August 2007}}</ref> |
Revision as of 20:15, 26 June 2012
Amity Shlaes (born September 10, 1960) is an American author and columnist from New York, who writes about politics and economics. She currently serves as director of the 4% Growth Project, a key economic initiative of the George W. Bush Institute.[1]
Education and career
Amity Shlaes graduated from Yale University magna cum laude[2] with a bachelor’s degree in English in 1982.[3]
For the past five years, Miss Shlaes has been writing a syndicated column for Bloomberg News.[4] The column appears weekly both on Bloomberg terminals and websites, and in papers such as the Orange County Register, Atlanta Journal-Constitution, San Francisco Chronicle, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette and Seattle Post-Intelligencer.[5] Miss Shlaes also writes a print column for Forbes Magazine, rotating with Lee Kwan Yew, David Malpass, and Paul Johnson.[6]
She is also a regular contributor to Marketplace, the public radio show. She has appeared on numerous other radio and television shows over the course of her career.[7]
Prior to writing her column for Bloomberg, Miss Shlaes was a columnist for the Financial Times for five years, until September 2005.[8] Before that she was a member of the editorial board of the Wall Street Journal, specializing in economics,[9] though also writing on a range of social issues. Her best known non-economic piece from this period was a 1994 study of rising hostility to outsiders among urban blacks, although this was published in the London Spectator[10]. She followed the collapse of communism for the Wall Street Journal/Europe and in the early 1990s she served as the Journal's op-ed editor.[11]
Over the years, she has written for The New Yorker, The American Spectator, Commentary Magazine, Foreign Affairs, Forbes, National Review, The New Republic, the Sueddeutsche Zeitung and Die Zeit, among others.[12] Her obituary of Milton Friedman appeared in The New York Sun.[13]
In 2011, she was named director of the 4% Growth Project at the George W. Bush Institute.[14] This initiative is aimed at illuminating ideas and reforms that can yield faster, higher quality economic growth.[15]
Before joining the Bush Institute she served a decade as a senior fellow in economic history at the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), an independent, nonpartisan membership organization, think tank, and publisher.[16] As a Senior fellow in Economic History at CFR David Rockefeller Studies Program, -- Shlaes worked within the Maurice R. Greenberg Center for Geo-economic Studies (CGS), dedicated to promoting better understanding among policymakers and academic specialists of how economic and political forces interact to influence world affairs.[17]
Since Fall 2008, Miss Shlaes has served as an Adjunct Associate Professor of Economics at New York University Stern School of Business, teaching a course titled "The Economics of the Great Depression."[18]
She has served at various times as Chairman of the Board of the International Policy Network, home to the world's leading prize for free-market journalism, the Bastiat Prize.[19] She serves on the jury for the Friedrich von Hayek Prize. She is a trustee of the American Institute in Contemporary German Studies [20] and the Calvin Coolidge Memorial Foundation.[21] In the past, she was a trustee of the German Marshall Fund.
Books and other writings
Amity Shlaes's first book was Germany: The Empire Within, about Germany national identity at the time of reunification. She has also written articles about this time period, including a New Yorker piece on the Deutsche mark and the Euro.[22]
She followed that book with The Greedy Hand: How Taxes Drive Americans Crazy and What to Do About It. It was a national bestseller.[23] Fred Goldberg, a former IRS Commissioner, called it "a terrific book on the history of politics and taxing in America... a must read -- whether you come from the left, right, or mushy middle."[24] Steve Forbes described The Greedy Hand as "the economic bible for those who believe in growth."[25]
Her most recent national bestseller is The Forgotten Man: A New History of The Great Depression. It is a study of the Great Depression in the United States and the New Deal. This book argues that both Presidents Herbert Hoover and Franklin Delano Roosevelt promoted economic policies that were counterproductive, prolonged The Great Depression, and established the modern entitlement trap."[26]
Novelist Mark Helprin said of The Forgotten Man: “Were John Kenneth Galbraith and Milton Friedman to spend a century or two reconciling their positions so as to arrive at a clear view of the Great Depression, this would be it."[27]
The Forgotten Man was a New York Times bestseller for 19 weeks.[28] Over 250,000 copies are in print. It has also been published in German, Italian, Korean, Chinese (Mandarin) and Japanese.[29]
Steven F. Hayward of the American Enterprise Institute wrote that The Forgotten Man was "the finest history of the Great Depression ever written."[30]
Economist Paul Krugman has criticized The Forgotten Man. He has taken issue with its central tenet that New Deal policies exacerbated the Great Depression. Krugman wrote of "a whole intellectual industry, mainly operating out of right-wing think tanks, devoted to propagating the idea that FDR actually made the Depression worse.... But the definitive study of fiscal policy in the 1930s, by the MIT economist E. Cary Brown, reached a very different conclusion: Fiscal stimulus was unsuccessful 'not because it does not work, but because it was not tried'."[31]
Krugman claimed Shlaes was disseminating "misleading statistics."[32] Shlaes responded to Krugman in the Wall Street Journal, specifically saying that for her estimates of employment and unemployment during the period she used the Lebergott/Bureau of Labor Statistics series.[33] She explained that statistician Stanley Lebergott "intentionally did not include temporary jobs in emergency programs -- because to count a short-term, make-work project as a real job was to mask the anxiety of one who really didn't have regular work with long-term prospects."[34]
Shlaes went on to say that if the Obama administration "proposes F.D.R.-style recovery programs, then it is useful to establish whether those original programs actually brought recovery. The answer is, they didn’t."[35]
Writing in Forbes, Hudson Institute fellow Diana Furchtgott-Roth first lays out Shlaes's view: "She points out that federal spending during the New Deal did not restore economic health.[36] Unemployment stayed high and the Dow Jones Industrial average stayed low." After then explaining Krugman's position that "the New Deal failed to spend enough money to achieve full employment," Furchtgott-Roth concludes that "the new president needs to listen to many voices."[37]
Krugman supporter Jonathan Chait has called the book self-contradictory, misleading, and inaccurate.[38] Novelist and essayist John Updike, a long-time FDR fan, criticized the book as "a revisionist history of the Depression."[39]
The International Herald Tribune review by David Leonhardt comments: "With 75 years of hindsight, surely we can all agree that Roosevelt’s vision was imperfect. Yes, he helped build many pillars of the modern economy — Social Security, the Securities and Exchange Commission, the modern Federal Reserve and more. He also understood the folly of Hoover’s protectionism and pursued a more open trade policy. And his public works slowly, if unevenly, provided employment. (As the historian Eric Rauchway has noted in Slate, Shlaes exaggerates joblessness in the 1930s by counting many people who worked in relief programs as unemployed.) But other attempts to fine-tune the economy truly did fail. From today’s vantage point, the worst of them may have been farm subsidies, which essentially live on, giving a handout to agribusiness while raising the cost of food for everyone else and hurting poor farmers around the world."[40]
Brian Wesbury wrote of The Forgotten Man that "if you care about markets, the economy, politics or personal initiative, you will love this book."[41]
Shlaes's also wrote the foreword to Seeds of Destruction, a book by Glenn Hubbard, Dean of Columbia Business School, and scholar Peter Navarro.[42] She also wrote the introduction to Wall Street Journal editor George Melloan's The Great Money Binge: Spending Our Way to Socialism.[43]
In 2003 she coauthored, with the late Robert Bartley of the Wall Street Journal[44], a piece on tax philosophy, published in the Manhattan Institute's Turning Intellect into Influence.[45] She also contributed to, along with Harold James and Samuel Gregg, 2012 the book Natural Law, Economics and the Common Good, which examines the nature and scope of ethics in relation to global economics, especially in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis.[46]
Shlaes also was a contributor to the special 30th anniversary edition of the scholarly journal Tax Notes. Her essay was titled "The Future of American Taxation.”[47]
She is currently at work on a biography of Calvin Coolidge. She is also working on an illustrated version of The Forgotten Man.[48] The co artist is Paul Rivoche, an award-winning cartoonist.[49]
Awards and Honors
In 2001, Shlaes was included in Yale Alumni Magazine's list of "Who's Been Blue."[50]
She was the 2002 co-winner of the International Policy Network's Frederic Bastiat Prize, an international prize for writing on political economy.
In 2003, she spent several months at the American Academy in Berlin as the JP Morgan Fellow for finance and economy.
She gave the 2004 Bradley lecture at the American Enterprise Institute. Her speech, titled "The Chicken vs. the Eagle," looked at the effect of the National Recovery Administration on entrepreneurs.[51]
She was awarded the 2007 Deadline Club award for Opinion writing[52], and the Newswomen's Club of New York's Front Page Award for her Bloomberg columns.[53]
She is the 2009 winner of the Hayek Prize, awarded by the Manhattan Institute. It is largely considered the most prestigious prize for conservative books.[54]
Academic Appearances
Amity Shlaes has lectured at numerous institutions, academic and otherwise. Her appearances include:
- Knox College (October 16, 2009)
- Purdue University (March 8, 2010)
- Brown University (March 15, 2010)
- St. George's School (November 1, 2010)
- Phillips Exeter Academy (Fall 2010)
- The Economic Club of Indiana (October 12, 2011)
- Ohio University (October 13, 2011)
- The Kansas City Library (February 29, 2012)
Personal
Shlaes married fellow journalist Seth Lipsky in 1998. They have 4 children.[55]
References
- ^ "Amity Shlaes Joins George W. Bush Institute" (PDF). George W. Bush Institute. Retrieved 20 April 2012.
- ^ "Amity Shlaes". Ashbrook.org. 2008-04-28. Archived from the original on 19 November 2010. Retrieved 2010-11-20.
{{cite web}}
: Unknown parameter|deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help) - ^ Online Yale Alumni directory
- ^ "Amity Shlaes". Amity Shlaes. Retrieved 20 April 2012.
- ^ "Our Leadership". George W. Bush Institute. Retrieved 20 April 2012.
- ^ "Our Leadership". George W. Bush Institute. Retrieved 20 April 2012.
- ^ "Amity Shlaes". Amity Shlaes. Retrieved 20 April 2012.
- ^ "Our Leadership". George W. Bush Institute. Retrieved 20 April 2012.
- ^ "Amity Shlaes". Amity Shlaes. Retrieved 20 April 2012.
- ^ http://www.johnderbyshire.com/Opinions/Culture/Extras/KingsOfTheDeal/mischief01.jpg
- ^ "Amity Shlaes". Amity Shlaes. Retrieved 20 April 2012.
- ^ "Amity Shlaes". Amity Shlaes. Retrieved 20 April 2012.
- ^ "Friedman's Warmth - November 17, 2006 - The New York Sun". Nysun.com. 2006-11-17. Retrieved 2010-11-20.
- ^ "Amity Shlaes Joins George W. Bush Institute" (PDF). George W. Bush Institute. Retrieved 20 April 2012.
- ^ "Amity Shlaes Joins George W. Bush Institute" (PDF). George W. Bush Institute. Retrieved 20 April 2012.
- ^ "About". Council on Foreign Relations. Retrieved 20 April 2012.
- ^ "Mission". Council on Foreign Relations. Retrieved 20 April 2012.
- ^ "Amity Shlaes". New York University. Retrieved 20 April 2012.
- ^ "Amity Shlaes Joins George W. Bush Institute" (PDF). George W. Bush Institute. Retrieved 20 April 2012.
- ^ "Amity Shlaes". Amity Shlaes. Retrieved 20 April 2012.
- ^ "Our Leadership". George W. Bush Institute. Retrieved 20 April 2012.
- ^ Shlaes, Amity (28 April 1997). "Loving the Mark". The New Yorker. Retrieved 20 April 2012.
- ^ "Our Leadership". George W. Bush Institute. Retrieved 20 April 2012.
- ^ "Books". Retrieved 20 April 2012.
- ^ "Books". Retrieved 20 April 2012.
- ^ "Books". Retrieved 20 April 2012.
- ^ "Reviews". Amity Shlaes. Retrieved 20 April 2012.
- ^ "Our Leadership". George W. Bush Institute. Retrieved 20 April 2012.
- ^ "Our Leadership". George W. Bush Institute. Retrieved 20 April 2012.
- ^ Glazov, Jamie (26 July 2007). "The Forgotten Man". FrontPageMagazine.com. Retrieved 20 April 2012.
- ^ Krugman, Paul (10 November 2012). "Franklin Delano Obama?". New York Times. Retrieved 20 April 2012.
- ^ Krugman, Paul (19 November 2008). "Amity Shlaes strikes again". New York Times. Retrieved 20 April 2012.
- ^ Shlaes, Amity (29 November 2008). "The Krugman Recipe for Depression". Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 20 April 2012.
- ^ Shlaes, Amity (29 November 2008). "The Krugman Recipe for Depression". Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 20 April 2012.
- ^ Schuessler, Jennifer (12 December 2012). "Inside the List". New York Times. Retrieved 20 April 2012.
- ^ Furchtgott-Roth, Diana (03 December 2008). "The Economic Fight Of The Year". Forbes. Retrieved 20 April 2012.
{{cite news}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help) - ^ Furchtgott-Roth, Diana (03 December 2008). "The Economic Fight Of The Year". Forbes. Retrieved 20 April 2012.
{{cite news}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help) - ^ Chait, Jonathan (18 March 2009). "Wasting Away In Hooverville". The New Republic. Retrieved 20 April 2012.
- ^ Updike, John (2 July 2007). "Laissez-faire Is More". The New Yorker. Retrieved 20 April 2012.
- ^ Leonhardt, David (26 August 2007). "No Free Lunch". New York Times. Retrieved 20 April 2012.
- ^ "Reviews". Amity Shlaes. Retrieved 20 April 2012.
- ^ Shlaes, Amity (14 August 2010). "Seeds of Destruction-Forward by Amity Shlaes". Glenn Hubbard. Retrieved 20 April 2012.
- ^ "The Great Money Binge: Spending Our Way to Socialism". Amazon. Retrieved 20 April 2012.
- ^ "Our Leadership". George W. Bush Institute. Retrieved 20 April 2012.
- ^ "Books". Retrieved 20 April 2012.
- ^ "Natural Law, Economics and the Common Good". Amazon. Retrieved 20 April 2012.
- ^ "Our Leadership". George W. Bush Institute. Retrieved 20 April 2012.
- ^ "Our Leadership". George W. Bush Institute. Retrieved 20 April 2012.
- ^ "ROCKETFICTION". Paul Rivoche. Retrieved 20 April 2012.
- ^ "Famous Yalies". Yale Alumni Magazine. Retrieved 20 April 2012.
- ^ "Bio". Amity Shlaes. Retrieved 20 April 2012.
- ^ "2007 Deadline Club Awards". Dealine Club. Retrieved 20 April 2012.
- ^ "Newswomen's Club of New York Announces 2007 Front Page Awards Winners". Newswomens Club of New York. Retrieved 20 April 2012.
- ^ "Our Leadership". George W. Bush Institute. Retrieved 20 April 2012.
- ^ "Amity Shlaes Joins George W. Bush Institute" (PDF). George W. Bush Institute. Retrieved 20 April 2012.